Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb News

185 Comments

Activision Cans Infinity Ward Studio Heads

Jason West and Vince Zampella apparently out, mood described as "freaked out" and "confused." Bobby Kotick to address studio this afternoon.

Zampella
Zampella
In case you missed it last night, Patrick Klepek over at G4 broke a big story about some extreme drama currently going down at Infinity Ward, the developers of Call of Duty 4 and Modern Warfare 2. The two heads of the studio, Jason West and Vince Zampella, are apparently out, and Activision has made a bit of noise in its 10-K filing about investigating charges of "insubordination."

Here's this bit from the company's annual report, released yesterday: 

The Company is concluding an internal human resources inquiry into breaches of contract and insubordination by two senior employees at Infinity Ward. This matter is expected to involve the departure of key personnel and litigation. At present, the Company does not expect this matter to have a material impact on the Company.

 
 West
 West
G4's definitely got a story worth reading, so check that out. Also, it sounds like there will be more happening in the near future, as sources have indicated to us that Activison CEO Bobby Kotick is scheduled to address the studio at large in 30 minutes or so.

We're currently planning on going back in to record an additional segment for this week's podcast to discuss this ongoing situation, and I'd expect that some choice quotes from Kotick's meetings with IW will be circulating later today. I'm totally flabbergasted over here, but of course, we're not getting the entire story. One has to wonder if we ever will. Either way, I bet that some publishers are already attempting to line up offers to start a new West/Zampella studio, assuming that Activision's talk of litigation wouldn't completely cripple such a venture.
Jeff Gerstmann on Google+

185 Comments

Avatar image for dannyj
DannyJ

449

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By DannyJ
Avatar image for bigchief
bigchief

513

Forum Posts

784

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 7

Edited By bigchief

Well, they got a hit on their hands, now it's time to milk that sucker until the teats run red and then milk some more. This is bananas, people!

Avatar image for potter9156
Potter9156

956

Forum Posts

2729

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Potter9156
Avatar image for rhaknar
Rhaknar

6300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 12

Edited By Rhaknar

IW needs to blow up for us to get some more bombcast? I can live with that :P

Avatar image for animateria
animateria

3341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By animateria
UPDATE: Via Joystiq
 

 According to the official statementwe've all been waiting for, Activision has announced that Infinity Ward heads Jason West and Vince Zampella are no longer with the studio. Activision Publishing chief technology officer Steve Pearce and head of production Steve Ackrich will head up the development house on "an interim basis." Furthermore, Call of Duty-related business will now be overseen by Philip Earl (now ex-head of Activision's Asia-Pacific region).

We first heard about a shakeup between Infinity Ward and Activision in the wee hours of this morning, and saw a few clues throughout the day regarding the two ex-IW heads, but this is certainly the clearest picture that's been painted of what has happened that we've seen as of yet. We've put in word to both the developer and the publisher to hear more about the future of the studio and what caused said schism. 


 
 
Activision essentially cut the head off of IW and placed their own members instead.
 
What is this? The medieval ages?
Avatar image for jokersmilez
JokerSmilez

1377

Forum Posts

573

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

Edited By JokerSmilez
@buzz_killington said:
"

These are the same guys who walked out on EA and 2015, so apparently they are hard-to-work-with-assholes who want to stay independent.

"
Maybe so, but they have numerous game of the year awards to their credit. They get pissed at publishers who try and stifle their vision, and so far it seems, rightly so. They got pissed at EA, went on to make Call of Duty, one of the best reviewed PC shooters of all time, then against the "better judgment" of Activision made a modern shooter, and not just another WW2 game, which has gone on to become the best selling entertainment release of all time.
 
Anyway, here's Activisions press release:
 http://investor.activision.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=448656
 
Sounds like IW is stuck working on map packs for a while. Maybe that's why things were tense? They were itching to work on something new but were stuck in the loop hole of supporting MW2 forever ? Who knows. All I know is I don't think I'll be buying an Activision product again. This is getting to be too much. Their business practices are just fucking horrible.
 
Avatar image for andymp
andymp

257

Forum Posts

163

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 4

Edited By andymp

Seriously, Activision are stupid. Very stupid. I might be done with the COD franchise after this.

Avatar image for light_bahamut
Light_Bahamut

198

Forum Posts

7

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Light_Bahamut

Bill Harris' take is rather interesting. Definitely worth a read:
 
 http://dubiousquality.blogspot.com/2010/03/strange-days-indeed.html

Avatar image for lead_farmer
lead_farmer

1084

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 14

Edited By lead_farmer

this is pretty nuts

Avatar image for jackel2072
Jackel2072

2510

Forum Posts

370

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

Edited By Jackel2072
@JokerSmilez said:
" @buzz_killington said:
"

These are the same guys who walked out on EA and 2015, so apparently they are hard-to-work-with-assholes who want to stay independent.

"
Maybe so, but they have numerous game of the year awards to their credit. They get pissed at publishers who try and stifle their vision, and so far it seems, rightly so. They got pissed at EA, went on to make Call of Duty, one of the best reviewed PC shooters of all time, then against the "better judgment" of Activision made a modern shooter, and not just another WW2 game, which has gone on to become the best selling entertainment release of all time.  Anyway, here's Activisions press release:  http://investor.activision.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=448656  Sounds like IW is stuck working on map packs for a while. Maybe that's why things were tense? They were itching to work on something new but were stuck in the loop hole of supporting MW2 forever ? Who knows. All I know is I don't think I'll be buying an Activision product again. This is getting to be too much. Their business practices are just fucking horrible.  "
this is the biggest PR nightmare from them Yet.
Avatar image for general_d23
General_D23

1210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By General_D23
@animateria said:

 

  Activision essentially cut the head off of IW and placed their own members instead.  What is this? The medieval ages? "

I honestly don't even know anymore. Ugh.
Avatar image for infamous91
InFamous91

936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By InFamous91

oh man, this is intense...can't wait to hear GB's reaction in the bombcast

Avatar image for coryboom
CoryBoom

12

Forum Posts

60

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By CoryBoom
@JokerSmilez said:

" @Hamz said:

" @Jackel2072: Rumour regarding MW3 was IW and Treyarch wouldn't be developing it and that Activision had decided to hand development to a third studio. I can imagine this, if true, would have caused extreme conflict between IW & Activision. Especially if it meant IW had to hand over code and assets of their work on the COD series to an unknown third studio to continue the series with. "

Ya, rumour has it that it would have been/will be Sledgehammer Games, the studio formed with former Dead Space devs. They've been quoted as saying they're working one a "future game for an exisiting Activision franchise" and a job listing of theirs lists requirements like: "5 years experience working on current AAA multiplayer shooters for current consoles and PC"  Sounds to me like Activision is pulling some not illegal but mean and nasty business practices, ie. "You signed a contract, now we own you, do what you're told or we fire you and then sue you." Technically Activision may be "in the right", but that don't make it right, if you know what I'm saying... "
Proof of the statement posted on Gamasutra
 
 http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/27484/Sledgehammer_To_Make_2011_Call_Of_Duty_Activision_Reorganizes_Franchise.php
Avatar image for bigchief
bigchief

513

Forum Posts

784

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 7

Edited By bigchief

Coming soon, Puzzle Quest: Call of Duty, and Call of Duty: the RPG! Also Call of Duty toilet paper.

Avatar image for lard
Lard

300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Lard
@SomeGuy890 said:
"
Wow... 
That is news. 
 
"Insubordination"  could mean anything from embezelment to them not wanting to make another cod game.  
Need more info. "
Very likely the second one.
Avatar image for andrewb
AndrewB

7816

Forum Posts

82

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 16

Edited By AndrewB

I actually ashamed as a gamer that the branding of "Call of Duty" is now worth more to the company that holds its rights than the quality of the games they'll likely produce in the future, and more ashamed by the number of people who will continue to swarm to the series despite everything.

Avatar image for gorehorn
gorehorn

99

Forum Posts

45

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By gorehorn
@Potter9156 said:
"Call of Duty is fucked.   COD Action Adventure? Really? Treyarch now being the main COD developer. ugh. "

 
What gives you the impression Treyarch would be the main CoD developer? They will release a game this year, but that was to be expected as they alternated releases with IW for years now. I'm sure IW already started work on a 2011 release of CoD, Activision just won't announce it before the Treyarch game has had some time on shelves.
Avatar image for jokersmilez
JokerSmilez

1377

Forum Posts

573

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

Edited By JokerSmilez

From Gamasutra: 
http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=27482
 
 "Another source with knowledge of the situation tells Gamasutra that although Infinity Ward is only about 75 developers strong, Activision brass demanded layoffs at the studio anticipating a refusal -- which they received, potentially opening the door for Activision to use that refusal as a way to launch a breach suit that would help it escape its contract."
 
So it's possible the "insubordination" was simply refusing to fire some of their own staff. And firing/suing these guys was a way of getting out of the "you can make another game before MW3" clause in their contract. It was these guys that signed that contract, not IW. It looks like Activision is free to force production on MW3 now if they want...
 
Ya, this doesn't reek of unethical at all... *rolls eyes*

Avatar image for general_d23
General_D23

1210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By General_D23
@Gorehorn:
Sledgehammer Games will have an Action-Adventure CoD game due out by 2011. 
 
Honestly wouldn't surprise me if they put out another big CoD that year too, though.
Avatar image for meatxbeatsxman
MeatXbeatsXman

264

Forum Posts

624

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 6

Edited By MeatXbeatsXman

Let's keep corporate corruption out of my video games, they don't go together well.

Avatar image for jerusahat
Jerusahat

141

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By Jerusahat
@Light_Bahamut said:
" Bill Harris' take is rather interesting. Definitely worth a read:   http://dubiousquality.blogspot.com/2010/03/strange-days-indeed.html "
I think his theories are the most plausible I've read so far.
Avatar image for kamikaze_tutor
kamikaze_tutor

163

Forum Posts

37

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By kamikaze_tutor

Insubordination is bullshit for "we needed some way to get rid of him".

Avatar image for sopranosfan
sopranosfan

1965

Forum Posts

35

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 8

Edited By sopranosfan

I have a strange feeling that a couple of guys partly responsible for 1 of the most profitable franchises in gaming history will be able to find a job somewhere.

Avatar image for gorehorn
gorehorn

99

Forum Posts

45

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By gorehorn
@General_D23 said:
" @Gorehorn: Sledgehammer Games will have an Action-Adventure CoD game due out by 2011.  Honestly wouldn't surprise me if they put out another big CoD that year too, though. "
I actually just re-read their official statement and they already announce both games in it (sort of). They state that there will be another game as well as the Sledgehammer-created one (which I knew about), but they don't connect a developer to it.
Avatar image for killroycantkill
killroycantkill

1608

Forum Posts

7870

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 13

Edited By killroycantkill

Tim Schafer has a funny put up a funny post on his Twitter  "Getting mad at Activision for this kind of thing is like getting mad at an ape for throwing feces. It's just how the beast communicates." Also over on Kotaku they broke a story about Activision basically doing what they did to thee Guitar Hero franchise, get ready for an Action Adventure CoD people.
 
KOTICK!!!!

Avatar image for arbitrarywater
ArbitraryWater

16105

Forum Posts

5585

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 66

Edited By ArbitraryWater

I'm excited to see what comes out of the hypothetical studio that will no doubt be made up of former IW employees when it is formed in a few months. Kind of reminds me of an event that happened to a certain website 2 years ago...

Avatar image for general_d23
General_D23

1210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By General_D23
@Gorehorn said:
I actually just re-read their official statement and they already announce both games in it (sort of). They state that there will be another game as well as the Sledgehammer-created one (which I knew about), but they don't connect a developer to it. "
Just re-read it myself and saw it too.  
 
*Sigh* I'm going to hazard a guess that IW will probably not be developing that one, but you never know.
Avatar image for potter9156
Potter9156

956

Forum Posts

2729

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Potter9156

 @Gorehorn said:

"What gives you the impression Treyarch would be the main CoD developer? They will release a game this year, but that was to be expected as they alternated releases with IW for years now. I'm sure IW already started work on a 2011 release of CoD, Activision just won't announce it before the Treyarch game has had some time on shelves. "

There's no mention of what IW will be doing after they're done with DLC. From that article, it sounds to me like Treyarch might be taking IWs place and Sledgehammer Games will take Treyach's place. But of course, I'm often wrong.
Avatar image for crusnchill
crusnchill

871

Forum Posts

170

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

Edited By crusnchill

An exact quote from Kotick:  "I wanted to take all the fun out of making videogames."
 
Well Congratulations Mr. Kotick! You've done what you set out to do you ass-hole. In terms of Infinity Ward studios at least.
 
Now I'm not a fanboy, but I do really hate that guy.

I mean this all just sounds like he's a victorious evil dictator that's shown up so he can make a self congratulatory speach in front of the very people who truly despise him for making these two guys quit in the first place, just so he can revel, like a power-hungry Sith Lord, in the fields of enveloping hatred all forceably pointing towards him. (Don't do it! Sith Lords just absorb it all and become more powerful because of it.)
Fake Quote from Kotick: "Omnipotent POWEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
 
Jokes aside, IW have being saying for many years now that they want to do something else aside and far away from anything even remotely related to the COD or MW series.
They wanted out. But like some controlling parents, Kotick probably(and would probably continue to say for reasons of money): "How about you do just one more and then we'll talk about letting your studio do something new afterwards."
 
Go West and Zampella! Make another studio and just wait for all IW employees to leave the embrace of the ever spoiling Activision and join the new studio. :-)
 
Man would I love to see Kotick get his!
 
What an ass-hole!

Avatar image for jensonb
Jensonb

2092

Forum Posts

3407

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 8

Edited By Jensonb
@Hamz said:
" It's sad to hear people are losing their jobs but frankly this sounds a lot like Zampella and West decided to refuse something Activision expected from them and now they're paying the price. My guess is Kotick will give the rest of IW an ultimatum of sorts, start accepting that Activision effectively owns them or hand in their resignation.  Personally it does seem like Activision is in the right here. A company like them, one that is both large and professional, wouldn't file an SEC report for breach of contract and insubordination from the two top dogs of a studio they own, let alone then sack them as well, without strong grounds to do so. Sounds to me like West and Zampella decided to revolt against something requested by Activision, perhaps in sharing code and/or other assets of the COD series with another studio for a future project. "
Hamz, do you make a habit of assuming the powerful have moral superiority and no ulterior motives? We know virtually nothing about what happened. Insubordination is a term so vague as to be virtually meaningless. This could be anything from embezzlement (Unlikely), through trying to negotiate a potential new deal with another publisher (Which is possible, but they'd have to have been inexplicably underhanded about it to warrant it being insubordination) to refusing to fire employees (As has been rumored), or even simply ignoring the Publisher's notes. Even in many of the ways in which Activision is legally "in the right", morally they are not. We haven't got the information to make judgments one way or the other, but it's incredibly short-sighted to assume big companies never screw over their employees.
 
This wouldn't even be the first time that we know of a company letting go of one of the guys in charge at one of their partners/subsidiaries because they didn't like their leadership, and blamed it on something akin to "insubordination". A dispute over "editorial style", anyone? At any rate, it remains to be seen what effect this will have on Infinity Ward (Employees who are not worried about losing their jobs presumably because they plan to follow their fallen leaders out the door will possibly start explaining, quietly, how much of an impact this will have within a week or at most a month) or the Call of Duty and Modern Warfare franchises (We won't really know on that front until late 2011 at the very earliest).
 
At the moment, all we can say is, this probably sucks for all concerned.
Avatar image for goodkn1ght
GoodKn1ght

522

Forum Posts

45

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By GoodKn1ght

you know what best thing for them, they're now free to start there own company with probably the zillions in royalties they made from modern warfare (I don't actually know if they do get royalties i would assume so though considering they're the heads) activision is a shitty company to work for and i bet whoever grabs these two dudes will be like" you know what, do whatever the fuck you want just make us money" which is what these guys are good at...which makes you wonder why the fuck activision would do this.

Avatar image for nickl
NickL

2276

Forum Posts

695

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By NickL

anyone else so the irony in jeff saying he wonders if the full story will ever be reveiled?

Avatar image for zohar
Zohar

135

Forum Posts

133

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Zohar

My guess on this is basically Activision wanted IW to whore out the franchise with as many sequels and spin offs as possible.  The two boss-men were getting in the way, citing such things as creative integrity, the dev time vs quality ratio, and maintaining creative control over the franchise that they helped to create.  They probably also wanted to keep as much CoD development as they could in the hands of the IW devs to ensure that their franchise doesn't get raped by outside dev teams.
 
Basically they were getting in Activisions way.  With the bosses gone they can plant whatever puppet they want in control and farm out the franchise to 20 different dev teams so they can completely saturate the market with Call of Duty until there's nothing left but a dryed up husk that's been milked for all it's worth.  Then they'll fire every employee involved in CoD, hold a conference where they question whether or not they should have bought DICE instead, and move on to capturing, sucking dry, and discarding the next game dev ignorant enough to get involved.
 
The biggest problem is that the mass market isn't gonna really know any of this.  I can only hope the IW bosses get as much of their dev team as they can to quit Infinity Ward and go make another studio.  Reminds me of some website from a while back...

Avatar image for joe731jk
joe731jk

13

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By joe731jk

stay frosty while you're oscar mike, jason and vince.

Avatar image for binman88
Binman88

3700

Forum Posts

49

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

Edited By Binman88

I don't think we need a tacked on podcast segment about a game company's internal affairs we know very little about, do we?

Avatar image for priorityseven
priorityseven

352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By priorityseven
@Binman88 said:
" I don't think we need a tacked on podcast segment about a game company's internal affairs we know very little about, do we? "
There's lots of information coming out about the IW/Activision situation. 
Avatar image for crusnchill
crusnchill

871

Forum Posts

170

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

Edited By crusnchill
@Binman88: Why not? It simply means more Bombcast.
Besides, Jeff's been through this bullshit himself he probably knows how Zampella & West are feeling. Hung out to dry most likely. And because of his personal experiences he is likely someone who's in a position to know a thing or two about these proceedings.
 
(Please note that I don't care what happened with Gerstmann gate. I just know that Jeff learned some harsh lessons from that chapter of his life, whatever they were, and that the extra segment on the Bombcast could be quite enlightening in relation to what the IW guys that've been forced out may be thinking about and just how they're feeling seeing their baby go up in metaphorical flames at the hands of their "Step-dad" Activision.)
Avatar image for kyreo
Kyreo

4680

Forum Posts

5544

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

Edited By Kyreo
@Ace829 said:
" I think I speak for almost everyone when I say "Fuck Activision". "
Word.  *sigh*  Why can't the two dudes that got fired get a publishing contract with EA.  Or better yet, Ubisoft.  Those guys don't like man sausage like Kotick does.
Avatar image for priorityseven
priorityseven

352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By priorityseven

You honestly would think that Activision would have learned their lesson with the "Hero" franchises.  But it looks like CoD is next up to be "Kotick'd".  
 
The guys at Blizzard have to be nervous as hell right now, 'cause they're probably next...

Avatar image for ultimatepunchrod
ultimatepunchrod

361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

Edited By ultimatepunchrod

yea, great move activision. Fire the two guys behind the highest selling game...ever. Im pretty sure they could have done anything short of a hostile take over and i wouldnt have fired those guys.

Avatar image for cashbailey
CashBailey

807

Forum Posts

106

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By CashBailey

I love what Tim 'God' Shaefer said. 
 
 "Getting mad at Activision for this kind of thing is like getting mad at an ape for throwing feces. It's just how the beast communicates."

Avatar image for nictel
Nictel

2698

Forum Posts

202

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 2

Edited By Nictel

Not wanting to blow Activision's horn but these are just shreds of facts and rumours. No need to start calling Activision the big evil empire yet. EA must be happy with that though.
 
I really don't think any company would file a SEC just because they don't want a daughter company to produce another game besides the main franchise. Refusal to lay off people is a bit more plausable. Still I feel that a lot more than that has to have happened.
 
Still a lot of "people" are going to react with a call to boycott all Activision products, regardless of the outcome. I do so hope that they realise this also includes Star Craft 2 and all other Blizzard games... 
 
Though unlikely, perhaps we will hear both sides or even the true story behind this all. If not everybody has signed their non-disclosure acts yet...

Avatar image for buzz_clik
buzz_clik

7590

Forum Posts

4259

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

Edited By buzz_clik

Without trying to sound like an old bastard about it, stories like these make me marvel at how far away from its roots the Activision brand has become. Where once there was an upstart company that split off from Atari to make sure programmer was king, we've got this kind of thing going on.
 
Of course, I say this without knowing what the two IW heads have been up to. But still, I'm sure this story is a mile away from what the founders of Activision would have envisioned when they started the company up. Weird shit.

Avatar image for buccura
Buccura

255

Forum Posts

88

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 12

Edited By Buccura

So this guys make Activision rich enough to buy all of Indonesia and what do they do? Can them.
 
Activision truly is the new EA.

Avatar image for captaintryhard
CaptainTryHard

256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By CaptainTryHard

I always did hate Activision. 

Avatar image for animateria
animateria

3341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By animateria
More news via Kotaku.
   
"Kotaku has continued to hear from sources that Infinity Ward wanted to make either a new intellectual property or a game set in the future — the two projects might be one and the same — but that Activision resisted that.

Tensions between Infinity Ward and Activision had intensified in recent months to the point that IW would only deal with two employees from the publisher, according to Kotaku sources."
 
They also link to another old article they wrote.

 Most notable quote being from Infinity Ward's Robert Bowling saying this about an Activision personel.
 
"Can you guys please stop interviewing this guy, talk to someone who actually works on the Dev Team at Treyarch and knows what the fuck they’re talking about. Not Senior Super Douche Noah Heller from Activision - who apparently has never played the game and doesn’t even work at the developer."
 
 
 Yesterday, and today's news surrounding the IW and Activision incident has been brewing up for quite a while it seems.
Avatar image for maclintok
Maclintok

191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 7

Edited By Maclintok

Interesting story.  I am as eager as anyone to assume that Zampella & West were released due to differences in opinion with Activision on where they see IW going as a studio.  Whatever the reasoning, it is surely going to be a huge blow to morale for the IW developers.  I can easily see Activision installing a "company man" to run the studio from here on out, prompting a further drop in morale and perhaps some high profile resignations. 
 
Then again, it's also possible some generous retention bonuses have or will be paid to the key creative leads at Infinity Ward.  As for Zampella & West, this is all very much a blessing in disguise.  They will not be wanting for new job offers and will are not likely to have much difficulty launching new studios either as a team or on their own.  Best of luck to them.

Avatar image for hypoxenophobia
HypoXenophobia

1069

Forum Posts

41

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By HypoXenophobia

This reminds me of when Spark was laid off by Activision during the making of Call of Duty 2: Big Red One.

Avatar image for koolaid39
koolaid39

342

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By koolaid39

I wish these guys the best, and I hope they are able to go off and make some great new games. I also hope that Kotick gets a reverse pineapple shoved up his arse for this dumbass move. Greed makes people do stupid things.

Avatar image for cadmus
Cadmus

305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Cadmus

Bobby Kotick is literally worthless, why are you people defending him??  Isn't it obvious?  He's trying to do the same shit with this MW/COD Franchise he did to the Guitar Hero Franchise.