Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb News

151 Comments

Locked Up: Activision Flip Flops on GoldenEye's Paintball Mode

Activision's decision to make classic multiplayer variant a pre-order bonus is just...ugh.

Paintball mode in GoldenEye 007 had to be earned. On Wii, it was unlocked by default. Now, it's a pre-order exclusive.
Paintball mode in GoldenEye 007 had to be earned. On Wii, it was unlocked by default. Now, it's a pre-order exclusive.

Turns out the Internet’s rabid paranoia was right on this time around.

When Activision issued detailing pre-order incentives for GoldenEye 007: Reloaded this week, it mentioned GameStop pre-orders would have a code unlock paintball mode, a classic visual "cheat" from the original. The fear was no one else would have access to paintball mode, but Activision dismissed those fears, telling me it was a standard in-game unlockable.

"If you don’t pre-order the game from GameStop you’ll still be able to play the Paintball mode, but you’ll need to unlock it by progressing through the game," said an Activision representative to me on Tuesday.

As fun as GoldenEye's single player was, it was multiplayer where the hundreds of hours went.
As fun as GoldenEye's single player was, it was multiplayer where the hundreds of hours went.

All good, right? Wrong. Activision sent me a note earlier today with a rather unfortunate correction: paintball mode actually is exclusive to GameStop. You will not be able to unlock it any other way.

“For online multiplayer, paintball is exclusive to Gamestop consumers, you can’t get it without an unlock code,” said the rep. “It’s still available as an offline mode for Mi6 Ops missions.”

Okay, fine. Maybe Activision’s simply planning to roll this out as downloadable content, as has been standard practice this generation.

“All DLC is TBA [to be announced], nothing is confirmed yet,” said the rep.

If you're playing online and the host has paintball turned on, you'll see it, too...which means it's on the disc.

Sigh.

I realize moaning about a simple paintball variant is a weird thing to get hung up on, but hell, paintball was one of my favorite modes from GoldenEye 007. Unlocking paintball wasn’t easy, either; it required beating the Dam stage on Secret Agent in two minutes and 40 seconds. This was a satisfying achievement before Microsoft attached scores to such things. My friend group would sit around the TV for hours, playing each level over and over again, in hopes of shaving a few seconds off our time.

We never did unlock Invincibility.

But when we finally unlocked paintball, we’d earned the right to play paintball--and damn it felt good. So while anyone who picked up GoldenEye 007: Reloaded through GameStop could optionally unlock the mode early, everyone else would still have the ability to flip on paintball the old fashioned way: earning it.

In light of Warner Bros.’ decision to lock Catwoman behind an Online Pass, despite heavily promoting her involvement until the week before the game’s release, it’s not hard to feel like things have gotten wildly out of control. Publishers, where the heck is the line here? Players, maybe we need to start drawing it. For me, apparently, it's blatantly taking advantage of my nostalgia.

The situation reminds me of an image I found on Reddit, a sentiment that probably rings true with some of you:

No Caption Provided

There are reasons this has changed, though.

The relationship between players and marketing has evolved, becoming more personal--witness the rise of the community manager. It’s about “brand engagement” today, with companies obsessing over the number of retweets, likes, and shares across social networks. Many fans are completely okay with this. It works for some fans, and doesn’t for others.

At some point, though, when has everyone lost sight about, you know, the game?

That’s what rubs me wrong about this. You wouldn’t include paintball mode in a remix of GoldenEye 007 unless you were intentionally strumming the strings of my own memories, but by locking it behind a retailer purchasing incentive, it insultingly misses the point. You know what's worse? Paintball was unlocked by default in the Wii version from last year. Default.

Perhaps it’s telling that Activision told me one thing on Tuesday and another thing on Thursday--even the publishers we're upset at aren’t sure what’s going on or what to do. Activision had it right the first time, though, and it still has time to fix it.

Patrick Klepek on Google+

151 Comments

Avatar image for lordcmdrstryker
LordCmdrStryker

356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

Edited By LordCmdrStryker

I only buy new games (and almost always on the PC) so this won't really affect me, but manis it irritating. I guess I can actually see their side of it and am totally for the killing of Gamestop, so yay for them. The always-on DRM thing that Ubisoft and Blizzard (grrrr...) are now doing is pushing me awful close to the edge, though. I haven't preordered Diablo 3 yet, you douchebags.

Avatar image for cheappoison
CheapPoison

1131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By CheapPoison

Cool.

Excuse not to buy activision stuff! yey!

Avatar image for nintendoeats
nintendoeats

6234

Forum Posts

828

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 9

Edited By nintendoeats

I complain about these things in their milder forms all day and people call me crazy. I'm having difficulty feeling any sympathy for Goldeneye fans when it is their demographic that most encourages this sort of behavior.

I'd say 50/50 chance that this gets reversed, but you can't honestly expect companies that are rewarded by this behavior to stop doing it if you only complain when it get's particularly egregious.

You have failed me fellow gamers, and now you see the reasoning behind my concern. Deal with it, I'll be off not caring about ancillary content and quietly enjoying my games.

Yes, I am in a bad mood today. Could you tell?

Avatar image for frondoni
frondoni

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By frondoni

@Grimluck343: I still don't get people like you. Even if you think this is overly "bitchy," or maybe too "petty," why are you siding with the companies here? This is non-rhetorical, I'd actually like to know your reasoning. You are arguing against giving consumers more content.

Why?

Avatar image for twisted_scot
Twisted_Scot

1213

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

Edited By Twisted_Scot

Never could 100% wrap my head around publishers. They bitch and moan about Gamestop selling their games used but they go out of their way to screw the consumer by offering pre-order bonuses to Gamestop. I get that they want people to pre-order their game and they must make a good slice of cash or they wouldn't keep doing it but Jesus, which do you want? Do they love or Hate Gamestop? Why not just stop offering pre-order exclusive to the company in return for no used sales for a period of time for example? Pre-order DLC is just ridiculous these days, yeah I'm look'n at you Rocksteady.

Avatar image for djfantastica
djfantastica

8

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By djfantastica

Not surprising. I wasn't going to get this anyway so eh.

Avatar image for jmood88
jmood88

417

Forum Posts

55

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By jmood88

I have no problem with the online pass stuff but the retailer-specific DLC is incredibly annoying.

Avatar image for amomjc
amomjc

978

Forum Posts

80

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By amomjc

I see this game flopping like Duke Nukem but instead of being shitty, people will just jump on it and realize why they don't care anymore and that it needs to just stay a memory.

Avatar image for laserbolts
laserbolts

5506

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By laserbolts
@davecuk

This is why we need Valve to make a console. They would tell the publishers with these crazy content exclusivity deals to go fuck themselves.

Sure they would with their ridiculous micro transactions valve can never do wrong.
Avatar image for gifftor
GiffTor

18

Forum Posts

122

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

Edited By GiffTor

Although it would require a concerted effort by the community (and, let's face it, unless someone from outside the industry talks smack [Ebert], that's about as likely as successfully herding cats), refusing to buy the games from the stores (like GameStop) that do this kind of thing might help curb the behavior. (I'm not sure why anyone buys from GameStop anyway, but that's 'nother ball o' wax).

Pre-order, exclusive DLC is BS.

Avatar image for fuga
Fuga

207

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Fuga

way too much reddit stuff being shoehorned in

Avatar image for hockeymask27
hockeymask27

3704

Forum Posts

794

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By hockeymask27

@jmood88 said:

I have no problem with the online pass stuff but the retailer-specific DLC is incredibly annoying.
Avatar image for iamjohn
iamjohn

6297

Forum Posts

13905

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By iamjohn

@Grimluck343 said:

@Superfriend said:

@Grimluck343 said:

@digitalsea87 said:

It's really sad it has come to this.

And to the people complaining about Patrick's 'soapbox': "Oh no, the news guy has an opinion about something! How dare he! Blasphemy!" - This is what you sound like.

Keep it up, Klepek.

Actually, what they really sound like is "Why is there a news article on the front page that's nothing but Patrick bitching about preorder bonuses?"

It´s what they call "editorial content". Go read a newspaper someday.

Editorial content doesn't equal news. Go read Kotaku someday.

Do you complain every time they publish previews under news too? Whiskey sites don't have a good way to differentiate posts as strictly news, editorials or what have you. What do you expect Patrick to do, break off the editorial into its own blog post? Then no one reads it because it's not right there on the front page, which is the entire point of his writing it in the first place.

Avatar image for zaglis
zaglis

912

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By zaglis

@laserbolts said:

@davecuk

This is why we need Valve to make a console. They would tell the publishers with these crazy content exclusivity deals to go fuck themselves.

Sure they would with their ridiculous micro transactions valve can never do wrong.

As much as I love Valve, since they started doing console releases, they have gone this dark path too.

L4D2. Gamestop exclusive baseball bat. Though later they just said fuck it and made it available for everyone on PC.

Portal 2: Like 5 different retailer specific skins / get nothing if you pre-order from Steam. + the fucking 40$ day 1 locked on disc custom animations and skins.

Avatar image for xxnbxx
xxNBxx

1110

Forum Posts

9033

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By xxNBxx

"Purchase content-unlocking gear from company store"

This is more of a Valve thing then a Blizzard thing. Blizzard only sells content that is inconsequential to game play on there store. If you were referring to what diablo 3 is doing then your not really that right there either, cause items are bought and sold by gamers. Hypothetically speaking, if no players put anything up on the Real Money AH then there wont be anything on the RMAH for anyone to buy. It's not like blizzard is making items and selling themselves, like TF2's shop works.

Avatar image for shabs
Shabs

906

Forum Posts

312

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 4

Edited By Shabs

I'm sick of putting up with this type of thing, but I don't know how we can stop it. I mean, we want this "extra" content, and the publishers know it.

I've pretty much boycotted all Activision games and GameStop as a store and pre-ordering as a concept, but everyone has a game they'll make an exception for. Come Mass Effect 3 time when GameStop has some juicy pre-order bonus bullshit, I'm sure I'll end up buying from them. Ugh.

Avatar image for nivi
nivi

132

Forum Posts

65

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By nivi

@xxNBxx: I read that bit as purchasing physical gear that comes with a code. Dunno if that's what was actually meant, but it's how I read it.

Avatar image for super_yosh_64
Super_Yosh_64

135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Super_Yosh_64

@ManMadeGod said:

Removing things from games in a re-release: a new low for pre-order content.

@ManMadeGod: game companies are becoming pathetic now

where is the creativity

Avatar image for rowr
Rowr

5861

Forum Posts

249

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

Edited By Rowr

Wait i'm having an idea.......

There's plenty of games coming out....

DONT BUY IT, FUCK ACTIVISION

Avatar image for prestonhedges
prestonhedges

1961

Forum Posts

42

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By prestonhedges

@iAmJohn said:

@Grimluck343 said:

@Superfriend said:

@Grimluck343 said:

@digitalsea87 said:

It's really sad it has come to this.

And to the people complaining about Patrick's 'soapbox': "Oh no, the news guy has an opinion about something! How dare he! Blasphemy!" - This is what you sound like.

Keep it up, Klepek.

Actually, what they really sound like is "Why is there a news article on the front page that's nothing but Patrick bitching about preorder bonuses?"

It´s what they call "editorial content". Go read a newspaper someday.

Editorial content doesn't equal news. Go read Kotaku someday.

Do you complain every time they publish previews under news too? Whiskey sites don't have a good way to differentiate posts as strictly news, editorials or what have you. What do you expect Patrick to do, break off the editorial into its own blog post? Then no one reads it because it's not right there on the front page, which is the entire point of his writing it in the first place.

Yeah, God forbid people don't read everything he feels like writing.

Avatar image for jah_donuts
JAH_Donuts

202

Forum Posts

115

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 4

Edited By JAH_Donuts

@hbkdx12:

Seriously this.

This pre-order fuckry is (and will forever be) the demise of in-game unlockables.

Avatar image for iamjohn
iamjohn

6297

Forum Posts

13905

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By iamjohn

@gladspooky said:

@iAmJohn said:

@Grimluck343 said:

@Superfriend said:

@Grimluck343 said:

@digitalsea87 said:

It's really sad it has come to this.

And to the people complaining about Patrick's 'soapbox': "Oh no, the news guy has an opinion about something! How dare he! Blasphemy!" - This is what you sound like.

Keep it up, Klepek.

Actually, what they really sound like is "Why is there a news article on the front page that's nothing but Patrick bitching about preorder bonuses?"

It´s what they call "editorial content". Go read a newspaper someday.

Editorial content doesn't equal news. Go read Kotaku someday.

Do you complain every time they publish previews under news too? Whiskey sites don't have a good way to differentiate posts as strictly news, editorials or what have you. What do you expect Patrick to do, break off the editorial into its own blog post? Then no one reads it because it's not right there on the front page, which is the entire point of his writing it in the first place.

Yeah, God forbid people don't read everything he feels like writing.

There's the point, going right over your head.

Avatar image for ravenlight
Ravenlight

8057

Forum Posts

12306

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Ravenlight

@Hauntedsoul said:

I say GiantBomb starts giving out a "Everything in here is playable" emblem for publishers to stick in the box and certify the rare breed of no BS games. Maybe then there would be some more apreciation for it.

I fully support this idea.

Avatar image for norusdog
Norusdog

356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Norusdog

blow me activision. I understand giving people bonuses for pre-ordering...but not to the fucking extent of locking others that purchase out of an entire mode of play (or anything similar)...hell I'm even fine with "online passes" to avoid used-game purchases (even if I don't agree or like it)

but this is bullshit..especially on a damn re-release and a mode that EXISTED originally on the......original.

what fuckwats

Avatar image for deactivated-5ffc9b0923f9f
deactivated-5ffc9b0923f9f

2527

Forum Posts

4764

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

That image comparing games in 1996 to 2011 is right on.

Avatar image for dg991
DG991

1435

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By DG991

It is easier to torrent a game to get all the content then it is to buy it legit.

Just saying.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e49e9175da37
deactivated-5e49e9175da37

10812

Forum Posts

782

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 14

I wonder if people would flip out if horse armor was a pre-order bonus for Skyrim. Literally something people hated because it wasn't worth fifty cents, let alone three bucks, but if it's a pre-order bonus, I bet they'd lose their shit. HOW DARE THEY LOCK ME OFF FROM HORSE ARMOR!!

Avatar image for supermarius
Supermarius

1223

Forum Posts

821

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Supermarius
@HandsomeDevil

While I think this sucks, I don't like Pat using his news position as a soapbox.

So you think journalists shouldn't call out coporations for shady business practices? That's a pretty strange attitude.
Avatar image for skillsne
Skillsne

20

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Skillsne

I just don't care about any of that. How you like them apples?

Avatar image for thepickle
ThePickle

4704

Forum Posts

14415

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

Edited By ThePickle

@digitalsea87 said:

It's really sad it has come to this.

And to the people complaining about Patrick's 'soapbox': "Oh no, the news guy has an opinion about something! How dare he! Blasphemy!" - This is what you sound like.

Keep it up, Klepek.

I'm not opposed to opinionated news articles. Do it with some some professionalism though. For as much snark and wit Alex puts into his news stuff, it still feels like news. This is news, but it's not written as news.

But thanks for being a child about this anyway.

Avatar image for nail1080
nail1080

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By nail1080

cry moar?

Avatar image for hoossy
hoossy

1075

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By hoossy

@Supermarius said:

@HandsomeDevil

While I think this sucks, I don't like Pat using his news position as a soapbox.

So you think journalists shouldn't call out coporations for shady business practices? That's a pretty strange attitude.

What you just described is a commentator. Journalist are not supposed to interject their own thoughts, just report the facts and allow the audience to form their own opinion.

This is why Giant Bomb needs a editorial section

Avatar image for thepickle
ThePickle

4704

Forum Posts

14415

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

Edited By ThePickle

@Supermarius said:

@HandsomeDevil

While I think this sucks, I don't like Pat using his news position as a soapbox.

So you think journalists shouldn't call out coporations for shady business practices? That's a pretty strange attitude.

Where did you get that from what I've said?

@iAmJohn said:

@gladspooky said:

@iAmJohn said:

@Grimluck343 said:

@Superfriend said:

@Grimluck343 said:

@digitalsea87 said:

It's really sad it has come to this.

And to the people complaining about Patrick's 'soapbox': "Oh no, the news guy has an opinion about something! How dare he! Blasphemy!" - This is what you sound like.

Keep it up, Klepek.

Actually, what they really sound like is "Why is there a news article on the front page that's nothing but Patrick bitching about preorder bonuses?"

It´s what they call "editorial content". Go read a newspaper someday.

Editorial content doesn't equal news. Go read Kotaku someday.

Do you complain every time they publish previews under news too? Whiskey sites don't have a good way to differentiate posts as strictly news, editorials or what have you. What do you expect Patrick to do, break off the editorial into its own blog post? Then no one reads it because it's not right there on the front page, which is the entire point of his writing it in the first place.

Yeah, God forbid people don't read everything he feels like writing.

There's the point, going right over your head.

Your point is to make a bunch of irrelevant references and absurd hyperbole/assumptions.

Avatar image for crimsonavenger
CrimsonAvenger

374

Forum Posts

2329

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By CrimsonAvenger

What's next, Multiplayer will be only accessible to those who pre-ordered the game?

Avatar image for ammic
Ammic

3

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Ammic

Y'know, I'm generally in favor of pre-order incentives if they're something silly like a new costume, or a spiffier looking weapon. That's fine, if I want it, I'll pre-order it and if not then I'll just...not...pre-order it.

That being said, stuff like THIS is seriously annoying. When the companies make it impossible for one person to enjoy and utilize a portion of the game based solely off of which store you decided to pre-order from, is where incentives turn into shenanigans.

And this, right here, is totally shenanigans. Everyone get your brooms.

Avatar image for seanakin66
Seanakin66

164

Forum Posts

37

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By Seanakin66

Hey folks, you know what I think is worse than your perceived grievances over Patrick's writing? The gaggle of knob-jobber bought-and-paid-for websites that shill for the various companies under the guise of objective news reporting. And need I remind you, it's the bullshit that system creates that led to there being a GB in the first place.

As for the greedy companies holding marginal-quality games hostage behind shoddy pre-order incentives, this is the main reason why I don't buy nearly as many games as I once did. In fact, when they pull this specific shit on games like Goldeneye or Arkham City, I suddenly lose all interest in ever (and I mean EVER) playing those games.

Avatar image for sins_of_mosin
sins_of_mosin

1713

Forum Posts

291

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 7

Edited By sins_of_mosin

I sure hope the same people bitching about this don't buy most of their games used as thats your main reason right there.

Avatar image for yukoasho
yukoasho

2247

Forum Posts

6076

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 7

Edited By yukoasho

@hoossy said:

@Supermarius said:

@HandsomeDevil

While I think this sucks, I don't like Pat using his news position as a soapbox.

So you think journalists shouldn't call out coporations for shady business practices? That's a pretty strange attitude.

What you just described is a commentator. Journalist are not supposed to interject their own thoughts, just report the facts and allow the audience to form their own opinion.

This is why Giant Bomb needs a editorial section

Agreed. A distinct news and editorial separation would likely help GB (and a whole shit-ton of other sites) quell at least SOME of the forum wars.

As to the paintball thing, whatevers. Never used it on the N64 or Wii, and it's not like they're locking away levels or characters like those bastards at Warner Bros. are doing with AA.

Avatar image for yukoasho
yukoasho

2247

Forum Posts

6076

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 7

Edited By yukoasho

@sins_of_mosin said:

I sure hope the same people bitching about this don't buy most of their games used as thats your main reason right there.

That's the thing. This isn't "online pass." This is "Go to Gamestop." I personally have no issue with Gamestop, but there are people who'd rather buy from Amazon or Best Buy or Wal-Mart (for some reason) than GameStop. Pre-order bonuses only screw people who go to a store other than the publisher's favorite.

Avatar image for thehumandove
TheHumanDove

2520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By TheHumanDove

I dont actually care at all about the game and wont buy it regardless, but this is a scary path that preorder bonuses are going down.

Avatar image for youngbuck
YoungBuck

207

Forum Posts

13

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By YoungBuck

It's a good thing I'm not planning on buying this game. The last disc based DLC I bought was for NBA 2K7 when they had the stupid replay editor. I'm not falling for anymore tricks these publishers have about unlocking features that are already shipped with the game. I bought Gears 3 but refuse to pay for any weapon skins.

Avatar image for majkiboy
Majkiboy

1104

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

Edited By Majkiboy

I will use my consumer power and not buy this.

Also there is no such thing as objective writing. I rather have this honest writing (as we can see on all WM sites), instead of some BS hidden agenda crap.

Avatar image for subyman
subyman

729

Forum Posts

2719

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By subyman

I loved all the crazy modes Golden Eye had on 64. That's what made it an incredibly fun game to play with friends. Golden gun, paintball, license to kill, rockets only, pistols only, scalable health, etc etc. It is a slap to the face for fans that immensely enjoyed the game to have these core modes locked into how I go about purchasing the videogame. I won't be supporting it. Too bad Activision, this was actually a game on my list to buy this year, but this sours the entire experience.

Avatar image for meatsim
MeatSim

11201

Forum Posts

150

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 23

Edited By MeatSim

This is the worst way to do pre-order incentives just say no to this.

Avatar image for satansmagichat
satansmagichat

187

Forum Posts

41

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By satansmagichat

This is NOT the same game as the N64 Goldeneye. Why would you expect unlockables to work the same way?

Avatar image for chubbaluphigous
Chubbaluphigous

610

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By Chubbaluphigous

I absolutely refuse to preorder anything at Gamestop. It is needless and just perpetuates this kind of bullshit. I want no part in it.

Avatar image for rekt_hed
Rekt_Hed

958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 8

Edited By Rekt_Hed

Activision and Gamestop: Together we own your game, money, memories and soul AND DON'T FORGET IT!


fuck these guys

Avatar image for example1013
Example1013

4854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Example1013

@HandsomeDevil said:

@digitalsea87 said:

It's really sad it has come to this.

And to the people complaining about Patrick's 'soapbox': "Oh no, the news guy has an opinion about something! How dare he! Blasphemy!" - This is what you sound like.

Keep it up, Klepek.

I'm not opposed to opinionated news articles. Do it with some some professionalism though. For as much snark and wit Alex puts into his news stuff, it still feels like news. This is news, but it's not written as news.

But thanks for being a child about this anyway.

No, all of Alex's diatribes feel like snarky opinion articles. The reason why they might seem "newsy" to you is because he doesn't use the first person. Instead of writing an op-ed as news (what Alex does), Patrick is writing an op-ed as an op-ed. He's reporting the news (Paintball is locked) and giving you his opinion on it (he hates it). Alex uses snarky third-person writing to make his articles look more factual and less opinionated than they already are, treating his statements as truisms that he's delineating for the rest of us (count the number of times he says "because of course it is") rather than opinion items formulated around a certain bit of news.