Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb News

287 Comments

Square Enix Invents Horribly Insulting Facebook Promotion for Hitman: Absolution, Subsequently Apologizes

This has not exactly been a banner year for Hitman related marketing, has it?

Image credit due to Rock, Paper, Shotgun, who captured this thing before it got shut down.
Image credit due to Rock, Paper, Shotgun, who captured this thing before it got shut down.

Oh Hitman: Absolution, you are too good of a game to have been as terribly marketed as you have been. I'm sure we all remember the Agent 47 kills sexy nuns for some reason trailer debacle from earlier this year, and now Square Enix has a new poorly-thought-out campaign to make amends for, which it already began doing within hours of anyone noticing it.

The concept in question was Square Enix's delightfully death-threat-laden Hire Hitman campaign for Facebook users. In the campaign, those with Facebook accounts could essentially craft a custom death threat for any Facebook user it saw fit. Okay, so that's generally awkward enough on its own, except that it also came with a remarkably offensive series of traits one could use to identify their "targets," and reasons for elimination. You could identify targets by noting their "tiny penis" or "small tits," and then decide they should die because they have "terrible taste in music" or for cheating on their partner. Lovely.

For its part, Rock, Paper, Shotgun has already pretty well covered the emotional spectrum one might feel when first learning of such a reprehensibly ill-conceived...thing. And within a breath of their story going up, Square Enix pulled the app, releasing an apologetic, if perhaps unnecessarily punny statement that read, in part, "We were wide of the mark with the app and following feedback from the community we decided the best thing to do was remove it completely and quickly. This we’ve now done."

So, Square Enix did a stupid, offensive thing, then realized it did a stupid, offensive thing and pulled it. That's great, though I am still left bewildered and wondering how this made it past the chain of approvals in the first place. Who looks at a Facebook app where you can call people out for their regrettable genitalia (among other insulting things) and threaten them with (fictional) murder, and says, "Yes! This is the direction our marketing campaign needs!"

Someone who probably shouldn't be in charge of marketing products anymore, that's who.

Alex Navarro on Google+

287 Comments

Avatar image for tennseven
TennSeven

16

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By TennSeven

It is amazing to me that there were probably multiple people who make six-figure incomes that worked a lot of late nights and weekends to put together this campaign and not once did anyone stop and say, "do we really think this is a good idea?"

Avatar image for sammo21
sammo21

6040

Forum Posts

2237

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 45

Edited By sammo21

So it looks like Square's marketing is really missing the target.

Avatar image for fredchuckdave
Fredchuckdave

10824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Fredchuckdave

This is hilarious and highlights the stupidity that is facebook/1984; good for Square, hopefully they make another good game one of these days.

Avatar image for firecracker22
firecracker22

750

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By firecracker22

I don't think this got taken down because people were easily offended.

It was a stupid idea. A stupid idea that somehow survived and actually made it to a second phase of stupidity that is kinda amazing when you think about this as a PR idea. I mean, this is supposed to warm people up to a series they may not know anything about? I mean, that's the pitch, right? You want to bring new people into the fold. Like this?

All I want to know is, if this was the best idea they could come up with...then what the fuck were the bad ones? Could there be a few other ideas that were so much worse that this one, in context, seemed good?

Avatar image for klumzee
KlUMZeE

328

Forum Posts

359

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By KlUMZeE

Wow, what the hell is with the marketing team for this game? They should all be fired immediately; what the fuck were they thinking?

Avatar image for oldirtybearon
Oldirtybearon

5626

Forum Posts

86

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Oldirtybearon

Wait wait wait. Hold the phone here.

A facebook app where you could put fake "hits" out on your friends, with a laundry list of crass reasons can only be viewed by the person who sent the hit/received the hit?

Exactly how is any of this a problem? Don't friends make fun of each other in the exact same way that a lot of these juvenile reasons are depicted?

Avatar image for devildoll
Devildoll

1013

Forum Posts

286

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Devildoll

i thought i read something about you only being able to send this to verified friends, and that only that person would see this message.

i'm not entirely sure though, but if this is true, then it would eliminate it's use as a bullying tool.

if i got those, i'd either laugh, or use it as a tool to clean my friends list.

Avatar image for pimblycharles
PimblyCharles

1922

Forum Posts

102

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By PimblyCharles

And I thought Edios screwed up IO's marketing in the past...

Avatar image for undeadpool
Undeadpool

8426

Forum Posts

10761

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 18

Edited By Undeadpool

And yet it's always EA that takes the most flak in any "bad game marketing" conversation. At least their bad marketing only fell on crap games like Dante's Inferno, this is harming an actual GOOD game.

Avatar image for madnesshero88
madnesshero88

56

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By madnesshero88

Something too evil and hate-filled even for the internet? Square Enix, i am impressed in a disgusted, head shaking kind of way.

Avatar image for anxioustube
AnxiousTube

245

Forum Posts

27

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 2

Edited By AnxiousTube

This reminds me of something Creed would do from the "Office(USA)"

Avatar image for rekt_hed
Rekt_Hed

958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 8

Edited By Rekt_Hed

fuckin lol ohhhhh lord

Avatar image for wakka
wakka

117

Forum Posts

10798

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

Edited By wakka

People are hypersensitive. The app is a joke. If we can't poke fun at someone for pretending that he has a little dick, and issuing a pretend death threat, all in the sense of good humor, then we can't have any fun at all.

I have a little dick, shoot me! Oh look, I'm poking fun at myself. Now I've offended myself and I apologize to myself for it. Geez.

Avatar image for dochaus
DocHaus

2916

Forum Posts

114862

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 11

Edited By DocHaus

You know what's more insulting than this promotion? The game itself.

Thank you thank you I'll be here never.

Avatar image for mr_scumbag
Mr_Scumbag

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Mr_Scumbag

@Wakka: You don't understand why people are offended.

Avatar image for mr_scumbag
Mr_Scumbag

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Mr_Scumbag

@Laivasse: I pretty much agree with you. The part about principled or responsible gamers/consumers is particularly depressing and would be funny if it wasn't such a problem. Even after all the leaks when the game shipped early, people went on and on about it looking like shit but that they would still buy it anyway because they might enjoy some of it. It's that kind of stuff that leads to more bad advertising or bad products. Marketers and producers respond almost exclusively to the bottom line. How much money they pull in. If people don't have the self control to vote with their dollar, they just re-enforce bad practice. It's not always easy, but it's the best way to make change. If you don't approve of something withdraw your dollar completely.

Avatar image for bunnymud
bunnymud

765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By bunnymud

I find the fact that this was given the green light highly mirthful

Avatar image for slag
Slag

8308

Forum Posts

15965

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 45

Edited By Slag

Holeeee crap.

This is a whole new level of dumb.

Everyone involved this promotion should be fired immediately.

Avatar image for deusoma
Deusoma

3224

Forum Posts

128696

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 4

Edited By Deusoma

Given how rad this game is, it's a real shame that the marketing team have apparently been huffing paint. I'm reminded of the brilliant minds who decided to market Splinter Cell: Conviction by having actors dressed in ski masks "pretend" to hold up a store, with the idea being a guy dressed as Sam Fisher would have then disabled them in a fake fight and then told everyone around that it was really marketing for the game. In reality, that played out as someone calling the cops the instant the fake robbery began, and the cops showed up before the Sam Fisher actor could make his move.

Avatar image for wakka
wakka

117

Forum Posts

10798

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

Edited By wakka

@Mr_Scumbag: I have a lack of sympathy for the offended, not a lack of understanding of why they are. Thanks.

Avatar image for mr_scumbag
Mr_Scumbag

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Mr_Scumbag

@Wakka: You say you know why people are offended, but your post implies that you think people are offended because they can't take a joke or are taking the "joke app" too seriously. That isn't why a good number of us are offended at all. Why is it that you think we are offended? Why are we hypersensitive? Because we are offended by something that you aren't? That seems like a very narrow-minded way of looking at the world, not to mention kind of arrogant. It implies that you think that your threshhold of offense is the correct one and anyone on either side of your demarcation is wrong. Maybe rather than all of us being babies who are easily offended, it could be you who is not fully considering the aspects of these issues and dismissing them out of hand because they are either too inconvenient or too difficult for you to honestly address. Either way when there are this many people getting this up in arms about so many things as often as they are lately and you handwave them away you end up looking both ignorant and arrogant. Society and culture change over time and this issues being brought up so much is a sign of that change. If you want to dig your heels in and stubbornly refuse to acknowledge that change it's your business but like it has been said so many times before, if you don't think there's reason to be offended, move on to the next story rather than announcing how thick your skin is to the the rest of us. It adds nothing to the discussion and no-one is impressed by how unfazed you are by real cultural issues. It's not a badge of honour, it's raising the flag of ignorance.

Avatar image for lastninja
LastNinja

296

Forum Posts

77

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

Edited By LastNinja

Looking forward to that new Carmageddon game, hopefully they can make it just as balls out insane as the originals.

Avatar image for teclo
Teclo

158

Forum Posts

60

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

Edited By Teclo

@Mr_Scumbag: Can you connect anything that you just said to this at all? Society changing has nothing to do with friends jokingly insulting each other. It's neither more or less offensive than it's ever been. There's a difference between something not being funny and what you're claiming here - so, taking into account that we agree it's not funny, what is the problem? Simply that it's not funny or anything more than that? If you're simply bleating out "I am offended", please refer to the words of Stephen Fry:

No Caption Provided
Avatar image for kittyvondoom
KittyVonDoom

447

Forum Posts

117

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By KittyVonDoom
Facepalm: Absolution (Pixelmator is already paying off dividends)
Facepalm: Absolution (Pixelmator is already paying off dividends)
Avatar image for intro
intro

1280

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By intro

That was a bad idea and plain stupid, but I don't see it as horribly insulting.

Avatar image for mcp_pants
MCP_Pants

11

Forum Posts

7

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By MCP_Pants

Its funny that lots of people agree that this is offensive, as its highly probable no one was actually offended by it. Who gives a shit. Im sure the simulated violence of the product it is promoting would have more impact on our frail wee society than a facebook death threat for having a small weener. Unless of course, you're weener is really small.

Avatar image for dougcl
DougCL

370

Forum Posts

155

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

Edited By DougCL

if the ad agency behind this gets work ever again, i will be SHOCKED.

Avatar image for firecracker22
firecracker22

750

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By firecracker22

I agree that being "offended" isn't something that should hold water. That there should be more to any situation than just being "offended".

But, when you're talking about a goddamn ad campaign that's supposed to win people over. Do you really think that's the smart approach? Yeah, I can see the defense of "over sensitivity", but there's no denying this was a dumb motherfucking move in something that's supposed attract people to a product. Not piss in their eye and tell them they should like it. Them apologizing was the smartest thing in this entire thing. It's a lot smarter than going the other route, and calling everyone a bunch of pussies for having delicate sensibilities.

This whole "easily offended" defense sounds more appropriate in defense of something like the Family Guy game, and not some half-brain idea that was somehow supposed to attract potential new Hitman players.

Avatar image for arsenalfan
arsenalfan

110

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By arsenalfan

I imagine heads have already rolled for this gaffe

Avatar image for theanticitizen
theanticitizen

426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By theanticitizen

I can't stop laughing at the idea of killing someone for having a tiny penis ha ha ha

Avatar image for deactivated-5945386c8a570
deactivated-5945386c8a570

429

Forum Posts

2008

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

aah, theyve lost all sense with this game.

Avatar image for removesstains
removesstains

67

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By removesstains

Yeah that is bad taste, but the 12 year old inside me finds it highly hilarious. Wish i would have came accross this last week. I haven't touched fb since the summer. What a great reason to start using it again. To bad people are babies.

Avatar image for masterbrief
MasterBrief

402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 2

Edited By MasterBrief

Lol it really hasn't been a good year for Hitman jesus

Avatar image for smilingpig
SmilingPig

1370

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By SmilingPig

In Canada death treats (even on Facebook) can get you 18 months in prison (they usually don’t though).

Avatar image for ewok00p
ewok00p

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

Edited By ewok00p

They should have kept it up for the people who wouldn't take it too seriously.