Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb News

420 Comments

Twitch Implements Controversial New Policy Changes

Notably, a system to detect audio-based copyright infringement.

Twitch announced several big policy changes today, the most controversial of which involves a service that scans archived videos for copyrighted music, and muting 30 minutes of the video for each infraction.

No Caption Provided

"We respect the rights of copyright owners, and are voluntarily undertaking this effort to help protect both our broadcasters and copyright owners," said the company in a blog post.

The copyright technology scans videos in 30-minute chunks, and if any infringing music is found, the entire 30 minutes is muted. This only impacts archives, however, and does not extend to livestreams. It's not hard to imagine that's coming at a later date but simply not possible yet.

This has already created some pretty odd situations on the service, including Twitch's own streams being hit by copyright sweeps.

No Caption Provided

Though it hasn't been confirmed that Google is purchasing the streaming service, the company's policy changes today sounds awfully similar to what's rolled out on YouTube with its Content ID system.

The other changes involve its archive (VOD) system. In the past, Twitch allowed all users to save archived broadcasts indefinitely, but that's no longer the case. Normal Twitch users can have broadcasts saved for up to 14 days, while Turbo (paid) users can have them archived for 60 days. Either way, it's no longer forever. Highlight reels, used to spotlight a channel's best moments, are saved indefinitely, but are now limited to a maximum length of two hours. That will likely have an impact on speedrunning players.

Patrick Klepek on Google+

420 Comments

Avatar image for dts
DTS

67

Forum Posts

55

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I wonder if Sony will push back against this. They have a vested interest in players wanting to use their cool Share tech. Maybe they strike a deal for exclusions from this system for things using their built in share functions? They probably spent a good deal of money making sure their console could be used for Twitch, but that'll all be for naught if players keep getting told their GTA V videos violate music copyrights. It'd be a real bummer if all that work was undone by Content ID.

It'll be really interesting to see what happens when a big company like Sony feels like their being negatively impacted by this, especially if they perceive it to be a major impact. I can see Nintendo not caring, but Sony probably doesn't want their Twitch-archive story to turn into "Yeah it sucks, don't bother with it, the audio never works right and it'll keep telling you that you're doing something illegal."

Avatar image for saturdaynightspecials
SaturdayNightSpecials

2593

Forum Posts

92938

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 26

I assume you guys have a paid Twitch acct, so you don't have to worry about your archives being deleted.

Avatar image for csl316
csl316

17004

Forum Posts

765

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

Edited By csl316

Wild West Internet is on its way out more and more each year.

Sadly, Avril Lavigne's gonna find this one day and lose her shit.

Avatar image for fisk0
fisk0

7321

Forum Posts

74197

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 75

Edited By fisk0  Moderator

So, does these changes for how long archives remain on there also affect older archives? If so, I hope someone has managed to rip all those classic Giant Bomb streams that never were posted on the site, such as that SNES stream and some TNT's.

I assume you guys have a paid Twitch acct, so you don't have to worry about your archives being deleted.

But if these changes also affect archives made before this change, they will only remain up for 60 days.

Avatar image for crow13
crow13

171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Seems to be what happens when a big company takes over a little company. Big company just becomes a large target for copyright infringements so they have to change a ton of policies to keep from getting sued. Still sucks for users though. Does Ustream do this stuff too?

Avatar image for deactivated-57d3a53d23027
deactivated-57d3a53d23027

1460

Forum Posts

121

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

@darek006 said:

I'm thinking about downloading all the GB content on Twitch that I can before deletion, but I don't know where to store the files. I don't just want to throw them up on YouTube, but maybe I'll have to.

YouTube essentially had this policy first so it would perhaps be best not to bother moving from one lemon tree to another.

Avatar image for bacongames
bacongames

4157

Forum Posts

5806

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 8

Edited By bacongames

I can somewhat understand the archive shift, even if it completely invalidates the entire point of telling people shit will be archived forever, if only because that's an enormous amount of data from random streamers with little to no audience to just sit there. The downside to that is now it puts the problem of archiving right in the laps of people who rightly took the twitch archiving for granted. The fact that so many communities and broadcasters are scrambling to preserve their good work, even if they're probably a minority of the overall data being affected, is going to be incredibly frustrating the moment something valuable is lost forever.

The music copyright scan business though? A disaster waiting to happen because it played it incredibly poorly for YouTube when it tried it. The fundamental issue being that the burden of proof is on the broadcaster and so any errant or unauthorized flagging gets put through, the content gets muted, and then it's up to the broadcaster/uploader to bust through the red tape. Often only to just be flagged again down the line, potentially without merit.

"Infractions" have also been automatically called on videos where the music was legitimately licensed which all but confirms the fundamental flaws with the system as implemented in the past. It would even be one thing if the muting system worked perfectly every time by people who had the authority to do the flagging but we have every evidence to assume it won't be the case and in fact we're already seeing it happen.

My only hope is that this stuff is copyright lip service to salvage what they can in the face of busted copyright law and our overly litigious culture. Otherwise it would have been for naught because unlike YouTube, people understood that this thing was for games and building a community around your streams.

Also I'd love to see the response from a publisher if people refuse to stream their games en masse because they're hard line with the copyright.

Avatar image for cadwr
cadwr

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

I'm contemplating moving my streaming over to Hitbox. Aside from all of this, the significantly lower video delay sounds great- chat participation / conversation is one of my favorite things about streaming, and Twitch's delay significantly hampers that. I'll wait and see how things shake out over the next few days though. I expect Hitbox will have some pretty big problems scaling up to increased demand; many popular streamers have already started moving over. The VOD thing makes me glad that I make local recordings of everything, even if it uses hundreds of gigabytes. The next few days will be interesting for both Twitch and Hitbox.

Avatar image for clonedzero
Clonedzero

4206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

So basically any game with music can't be streamed. So like all games? Hmmm....

Avatar image for durden77
durden77

321

Forum Posts

56

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By durden77
No Caption Provided

Thanks Google. Knew this kind of stuff was coming, but I had no idea it would be so instantaneous and automated like this. I don't even see how a service that is specifically created for streaming games full of copyrighted music is going to survive with this. Especially once it inevitably starts affecting live-streams.

Avatar image for whitepolypousthing
WhitePolypousThing

6

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@truthtellah: Not only just the biggest contributors. I have to imagine most people who contribute to/enjoy watching Twitch will see the negative impacts of these policies. Unlike in the case of Youtube, where policies similar to this only effected a percentage of its userbase, the blow back from this ought to be harder to ignore (theoretically).

Avatar image for soniking
Soniking

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

@patrickklepek: There are already a lot of people affected by the audio recognition stuff. I know you already highlight the issue but the bigger problem is in tandem with the VOD archiving issue and those potentialy affected. You also talk a bit about that in the last paragraph but it seemed like a lot of people talking about this have shortened the issue from the people who were obviously affected in one way or another into a conversation about user rage. You don't do this specifically, but that last chapter I thought could have used some bolstering. Hope I don't sound entirely like a jerk, I really like your writing.

Avatar image for deusoma
Deusoma

3224

Forum Posts

128695

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 4

@jackalol said:

@kaijuuninpo said:

Nothing good lasts forever unfortunately. Hopefully some new twitch-like service will come from out of nowhere and people will just migrate to that.

That's probably the most likely scenario. Or they backpedal hard on this new policy, after realizing how ridiculous it is.(probably not as likely)

Well hey, never say never, Microsoft backed off on the features that were going to cripple the Xbone after all, and they hate change for the consumer's sake.

Avatar image for derek_davis
derek_davis

142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By derek_davis

All streamers should keep in mind, this service has been available completely free for a long time. Don't feel like you're entitled to these great services forever tho, shit costs money!!

Avatar image for kanerobot
KaneRobot

2802

Forum Posts

2656

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 9

Edited By KaneRobot

Just bring on the next upstart streaming service already. It's clear that Twitch is already pretty much fucked and will only get worse from here on out.

Avatar image for truthtellah
TruthTellah

9827

Forum Posts

423

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

You are all free now... from supporting Twitch. Where's the next streaming outlet that we should start supporting instead?

Loading Video...

Avatar image for thegorilla
TheGorilla

232

Forum Posts

693

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Bye Twitch. End of a 6 month era.

This is why I skip music entirely. No desire to deal with these people in any way.

Avatar image for spraynardtatum
spraynardtatum

4384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

Edited By spraynardtatum

I'm deleting my account. Do you know what...I'm deleting my Youtube account too.

Avatar image for bbqbram
BBQBram

2497

Forum Posts

88

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By BBQBram

RIP Twitch.tv

Avatar image for deactivated-60dda8699e35a
deactivated-60dda8699e35a

1807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I can see people making a case for censoring licensed music. If the record labels don't want free advertising, then so be it. However, blocking THIRTY MINUTES of audio is absolutely fucking unacceptable. Most songs nowadays are a little over three minutes, so blocking ten times that amount is ridiculous. Hell, I don't even know WHY people want to censor this shit in the first place, like I said, it's FREE advertising! I've actually looked up songs I never would have known about due to twitch streamers, and I will admit that I even went onto Amazon to buy some of the tracks!

However, they are ALSO blocking video game music as well! It's not just licensed music, which I find to be absolutely mind-blowing. They're seriously blocking the sounds of the fucking game?? What the fuck?!

They absolutely deserve the shit storm this is generating for not thinking this shit through.

Edit: What also pisses me off is how they're spinning it - they're claiming they're "Helping" their users with the introduction of this system. Oh for fucks sake, we're not fucking sheep, just come out with it and say why you REALLY implemented this change.

Avatar image for angrighandi
AngriGhandi

953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By AngriGhandi

open contempt for your users and their needs

always a good business strategy

Avatar image for gaff
Gaff

2768

Forum Posts

120

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Devil's Advocate here: Good for the session musicians. They get far too little recognition for their work and hopefully can get their share of the performing rights so they can eke a living.

Avatar image for valeo
valeo

313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By valeo

Just like with Digg and Reddit, something else will fill the void.

The sad fact is; the more popular you are, the more pressure there is from idiots like the RIAA.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cc8838532af0
deactivated-5cc8838532af0

3170

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 12

@rotnac: Want to post in chat? How about you sign in with Google Plus? No? Okay fine I'll just ask again tomorrow.

@deusoma: We are living in a world where Blizzard pulled out a feature disliked by their community before a year passed launch, so as far as I'm concerned anything is possible in this crazy world. I'm referring to the Artifact system in Heroes of the Storm.

Avatar image for iceman228433
iceman228433

743

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

well this sure sounds like it could be the end of Twitch.

Avatar image for silver-streak
Silver-Streak

2030

Forum Posts

587

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 4

Weeeell Crap.

Avatar image for thesoutherndandy
TheSouthernDandy

4157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By TheSouthernDandy

Que the mass exodus from Twitch to whoever is doing it almost as well. I'm interested to see where this goes but Twitch needs to get this figured out or they're gonna lose out.

Avatar image for juggaloacidman
JuggaloAcidman

427

Forum Posts

49

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 4

Edited By JuggaloAcidman

Does this effect video game music? Like the Mario theme song for instance?

Avatar image for guanophobic
guanophobic

587

Forum Posts

198

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

@bacongames: Very well written, my thoughts exactly.

When Google bought Youtube there was a STRONG disbelief in the service, seeing as the most popular videos around then were copyrighted material and AMV-clips (technically copyright infringement?).

Youtube proved those doubters wrong as we all know by slowly creating it's own content/community over the years. That these people have to take the battle against these takedown systems now, is fucking absurd.

My guess is Youtube is putting pressure on Twitch to enforce these kinds of systems to

  1. Calm down copyright holders and investors, once the buyout is official.
  2. Have a scapegoat, telling users that "these systems were already in place before we took over, we're not the bad guy over here".
Avatar image for deactivated-630479c20dfaa
deactivated-630479c20dfaa

1683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

All my vods got muted pretty damn fast. sad times..

I am thinking of jumping ship, these copyright laws are beyond arcane and should be adapted some way. Until then, I don't think I am willing to stay with twitch out of principle really, even though I don't blame them, they are just abiding to silly laws.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cc8838532af0
deactivated-5cc8838532af0

3170

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 12

@juggaloacidman: Yes it seems like some are getting flagged. VoDs of the International 4 are being muted because of the in game music. It's insanity.

Avatar image for spraynardtatum
spraynardtatum

4384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

@gaff said:

Devil's Advocate here: Good for the session musicians. They get far too little recognition for their work and hopefully can get their share of the performing rights so they can eke a living.

HA!

Avatar image for guanophobic
guanophobic

587

Forum Posts

198

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

@derek_davis said:

All streamers should keep in mind, this service has been available completely free for a long time. Don't feel like you're entitled to these great services forever tho, shit costs money!!

This. Also, people going over to sites like hitbox are probably going to get real disappointed, real soon if the masses are migrating too quickly from Twitch. I can't even fathom how high Twitch's bandwidth/datacenter costs must be.

Anyone got an insight on this?

Avatar image for themanwithnoplan
TheManWithNoPlan

7843

Forum Posts

103

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 14

Edited By TheManWithNoPlan

This whole fucking thing is a pile of gas sitting in a matchbook factory.

Avatar image for sammo21
sammo21

6040

Forum Posts

2237

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 45

So how will this effect games like Grand Theft Auto or other games with licensed music.

Avatar image for crow13
crow13

171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By crow13

@patrickklepek: Would be nice to know how/if they plan on doing anything for games that have copyrighted music as their soundtrack. i.e. GTA, Rock Band, Audiosurf.

Avatar image for mr_creeper
mr_creeper

2458

Forum Posts

13

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Looks like the sky WAS really falling.

Avatar image for deactivated-583dfbc21c8a9
deactivated-583dfbc21c8a9

85

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

It was fun while it lasted...

Avatar image for renegadedoppelganger
RenegadeDoppelganger

647

Forum Posts

297

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

So the rules on VOD retention only apply going forward right? Surely they can't be retroactively deleting VODs older than 14/60 days...

Avatar image for deactivated-630479c20dfaa
deactivated-630479c20dfaa

1683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@gaff said:

Devil's Advocate here: Good for the session musicians. They get far too little recognition for their work and hopefully can get their share of the performing rights so they can eke a living.

Excuse me but how the hell is a video game streamer who plays music on his stream affecting the living of any musicians? If his music is bought and paid for he has done his share. No one, unless you are a crazy person, tune into a stream hoping that a particular song will be played, that's beyond unrealistic. And even if that song was played, it would have blaring video game sounds and possibly commentary in the mix. It does not affect the musician's living at all.

Avatar image for guanophobic
guanophobic

587

Forum Posts

198

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

@crow13 said:

@patrickklepek: Would be nice to know how/if they plan on doing anything for games that have copyrighted music as their soundtrack. i.e. GTA, Rock Band, Audiosurf.

Not to mention that Steve Aoki stream! *shudders*

Avatar image for sgtsphynx
sgtsphynx

2681

Forum Posts

682

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 32

sgtsphynx  Moderator

This. Also, people going over to sites like hitbox are probably going to get real disappointed, real soon if the masses are migrating too quickly from Twitch. I can't even fathom how high Twitch's bandwidth/datacenter costs must be.

Anyone got an insight on this?

Funny you should mention that...

Avatar image for cornbredx
cornbredx

7484

Forum Posts

2699

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 15

Edited By cornbredx

@guanophobic said:

...

My guess is Youtube is putting pressure on Twitch to enforce these kinds of systems...

...

It's much more likely that they are getting pressure from the RIAA (same as google- although with google their pressure comes from other, more complicated, avenues as well).

Google (Youtube) has nothing to gain from pressuring Twitch to do anything.

I'm not saying they aren't talking about buying Twitch, but I'm not one to make assumptions based on rumors, and that rumor has yet to have any substantial merit. This policy change really has nothing to do with that, even if it is true, and is more likely just due to their new found growth. The RIAA has a history of being litigious. Any internet company that starts to get big enough to notice is going to have them knocking on the door sooner or later. It's in Twitch's best interest to get ahead of it now.

It sucks, but it really was only a matter of time. Same with what happened to Youtube. What's shitty is how difficult it is to prove what you're doing is in no way illegal or infringing, though. One can hope it wont be that bad with Twitch, but I don't know. We'll see how it pans out.

Avatar image for project343
project343

2897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 16

@d_w said:

I don't know why Google thinks they can automate this sort of process.

That... that is fucking horrible. What a nightmare. This is a really easy way to shoo your audience toward other services.

Avatar image for shoshiaj
shoshiaj

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

it sucks but makes sense or else the storage would get crazy

Avatar image for robo
Robo

988

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Oh neat. So they are literally doing exactly what a lot of 'cynics' said they would start doing once Google entered the picture.

So I guess those concerns were warranted, huh?

Avatar image for megalowho
megalowho

1148

Forum Posts

4888

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 28

Doesn't seem like a lot of nuanced thought went into the implementation of this decision, which is a real shame when you're dealing with a medium like video games where sounds and music are a core part of the experience. To not even attempt to find a more agreeable way to partner with in-game license holders aside from preemptive muting in 30 minute chunks is a real shame for such a promising platform. If streamers choose to migrate to Hitbox or a different service I wouldn't hesitate to follow.

Avatar image for casper_
casper_

915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By casper_

@gaff: from my experience very few session guys get performance royalties. It's usually just a flat rate for the session. The main exception would be unionized groups like the orchestras that do film scores in CA.

Avatar image for subyman
subyman

729

Forum Posts

2719

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

So pretty much any stream with music (all streams) are going to be muted? The best are the streams in which the game's music is being flagged.