Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb News

181 Comments

Worth Reading: 05/23/2014

Both this and Worth Playing are taking a week off, so let's go out with a bang.

Change is scary as hell, but whether it happens sooner or later, change is part of life. Sometimes you know it's coming, sometimes it hits you like a pile of bricks. Often, it's a little bit of both. But change happens.

No Caption Provided

A year after moving back to Chicago, Vinny is headed to New York. While our lives are in different places, our reasons are pretty similar: we both spent significant amounts of time on the west coast, yet our families are in other parts of the country. I'll always value the life I built on my own, away from everything I knew growing up, but some of us have to go back.

Right before my father passed away, I had dinner with my parents, and we told them we'd be moving back to Chicago. We didn't know when, but it would happen in the next year or two. Then, he died, and it wasn't even a question. But I gave myself a year to figure everything out, and leaving right after Giant Bomb was acquired by CBS seemed like a bad message to send. (I already have a reputation of leaving places that are turning into sinking ships!)

The last year has been, to borrow a reviewing cliche, a mixed bag. Coming to define what my role is at Giant Bomb, a website built on collaboration, has been tough. Not everything has worked. Quick Look Solos, for example, are born out of my back against the wall. I'm going to start bringing in various gaming writers around Chicago to hang out with me in future videos, at least videos that aren't about looking at a horror game.

But I've relished the challenge, and enjoyed the little victories. A reason I've left previous jobs is boredom. That's not the case with Giant Bomb, even if Chicago has proven the ideal situation personally but the less ideal situation professionally. But even that's changing. Super Professional Fridays has been fantastic, and while we haven't had one in a few weeks (we'll be back before E3), there are plans in motion for later this year that should make that less of an issue, and I'm curious to see where it can go when it's around longer.

Plus, we're building a community in Chicago. Our meetup earlier this month was a huge success. We'll have another one to remember Mr. Ryan Davis later in June, and I'm hoping Giant Bomb Chicago meetups can become a monthly affair. I know that some people aren't the biggest fan of the solo content that's come out of my neck of the woods, and I take every piece of feedback, both positive and negative, with humility and appreciation. The edited Kinect video, for example, is one way I'm considering tackling video subjects that just don't work as well with a single person talking. I'm considering Crusader Kings 2 as my first experiment...

In any case, I'm rambling. I'm excited for Vinny. I'm excited for Alex. I'm excited for Giant Bomb. I guarantee you some very cool stuff is coming in the not-so-distant future. It'll just be different.

Hey, You Should Play This

Click To Unmute
Worth Playing: 05/22/2014

Want us to remember this setting for all your devices?

Sign up or Sign in now!

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to Giant Bomb's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

And You Should Read These, Too

No Caption Provided

One of my greatest honors was the year and change I spent working at G4. More specifically, working alongside Adam. When I realized the Infinity Ward story was about to happen, I texted him some of the phrasing I would be using, and he told me to wait 20 minutes. He'd already spent the day filming, and even though he'd already sat down with a drink, he was coming back to the office. We were going to walk through the story, make sure we were happy with every single sentence and phrasing, and let history unfold. In the days ahead, he would push to have me on camera to talk about the story I was responsible for, and apologize when the network would ask him to do it instead, since he was the known quantity. The whole reason I was given an opportunity to host part of G4's E3, part of the reason I was eventually hired at Giant Bomb, was because Adam gave me a shot. Anyway, his piece is really great. Read it.

"It's 2000 in San Francisco and the dot-com boom is still governing the hedonistic strut of the city. I have no memory of ever paying for a meal or a drink during this time. A consistent stream of parties from companies long, and deservedly, forgotten, all using the same caterer that slices roast beef into a sourdough discus with mustard as an optional condiment. There's a hint of uncertainty in the air but everything unfolds in my mind as a collection of brilliant nights whose sheer propulsive determinism will withstand any obstacle to this brave new entrepreneurial future.

For months, I play Deus Ex, staying late at the office and finding any free moment during the day to jump back into this game depicting a collapsed world of misplaced power, economic disparity and paranoid motivations. I had never before played a game that meted out such satisfaction. The most distinct break from the governing game logic of finding the right path or second-guessing the designer's intentions, it was a playground of experimentation and discovery."

No Caption Provided

While I don't agree with this piece, I wanted to share it, since the sentiment comes up all the time. It's a common argument, and one that I can, in select cases, understand. Let's put aside anything that was said about Far Cry 4, since it doesn't matter to the point I'm making here. Where Colin and I part ways is subtext surrounding the criticisms aimed at Far Cry 4. I cannot be 100% sure, but I suspect anyone who took issue with Far Cry 4's artwork wasn't saying Far Cry 4 or any other video game cannot deal in uncomfortable situations or delicate subjects, but that doing so opens yourself up to a particular line of criticism the creators should be prepared for. Games can and should tackle whatever subject they want to, but you don't get credit for being edgy: you actually have to pull it off, too.

"In short, it seemed to me to be the stuff of a good, believable antagonist. And I was excited about that. Apparently, some others weren't. I'm not surprised by the reaction some folks had to Far Cry 4's introductory artwork, even if I don't personally see it as inherently racist or otherwise problematic. What I'm surprised about, the more I think about it, is that some people see something they think is troubling, yet don't put it into the context of what they're actually looking at. Sometimes, things are designed specifically to trouble you. And as a gamer hungry for storytelling, I don't like the insinuation--and this insinuation is fairly loud--that games just aren't allowed to deal with tough issues, lest they offend someone."

If You Click It, It Will Play

These Crowdfunding Projects Look Pretty Cool

  • Flop Flop Fly is the kind of game you should back if you're into rotating models of sandals.
  • Caffeine joins the long list of sci-fi horror projects coming down the pike.
  • SumoBoy wants to tell a story about bullying with some ex-AAA developers.

A Blog Post About F2P By The Room's Creators Has Folks Talking

  • Barry Meade kicked off this conversation, arguing mobile was burning and F2P was responsible.
  • Adam Saltsman warns it's not easy to take so many lessons from one successful game.
  • Jake Simpson lays out some of the broader complexities of mobile Meade's post doesn't account for.

Tweets That Make You Go "Hmmmmmm"

Commenter: Fuck these rich devs for Kickstarting! Me: Did you listen to why he needs help? C: No, and I won't. http://t.co/RKWbWTzSbQ

— Greg Miller (@GameOverGreggy) May 19, 2014

Publisher Kickstarter dilemma - either they made tons of money and think they don't need you - or they didn't - which says a lot as well.

— Shams Jorjani (@ShamsJorjani) May 19, 2014

i’d bet the Wolfenstein folks really mean well, but i’d prefer to dwell on the Holocaust in a context other than “action shooter”

— Jon Bois (@jon_bois) May 20, 2014

Good will is a resource companies frequently exchange for Kickstarter backing. Not sure it's always worth it to fund one project.

— Brendan Sinclair (@BrendanSinclair) May 21, 2014

Oh, And This Other Stuff

Patrick Klepek on Google+

181 Comments

Avatar image for acidbrandon18
AcidBrandon18

1382

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Man. I could really go for a new Ape Escape game.

Avatar image for takua108
takua108

1596

Forum Posts

3503

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 16

@marokai said:

@psychedeliholic said:

Anyone who looks at the Far Cry art and doesn't see the potential racial/sexual issues implied therein is in serious need of remedial art history instruction.

Doing so at this point is literally judging something based on its cover. The irony of this from some people astonishes me.

That really sums the whole thing up. "Judging a game by its not-even-final cover."

Avatar image for fiercedeity
FierceDeity

364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This dude in the comments on that IGN piece got it right, in my opinion. Also, I used to listen to some IGN podcasts until Moriarty’s attitude soured me on them completely. He does not strike me as someone who thinks these things through.Staephendedalus12 hours ago

Jesus Christ. For the last time, the controversy isn't about the fact that racism is in the game. It's about HOW the developer employs racism in a sensationalist manner as a cliche or plot device. It's taking a very serious topic and cheapening it. And you all want gaming to be taken seriously? Grow the eff up. That includes you, Colin. This is why gaming is still seen as 'the immature douche' medium. In fact, whenever I'm on any forum and the topic of gaming not maturing is brought up, I'll have a reason why. I'll just link them to a random comment section on IGN. Or an article like this, in which Colin deflects, derails, and makes light of a serious issue to reassure all the 15 year olds on here that they don't need to grow up.

Right, because telling someone to "Grow the eff up" for having a different view is a clear sign of maturity. Talk about a lack of self-awareness.

Avatar image for fiercedeity
FierceDeity

364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@lysergica33 said:

Am I the only one who doesn't see racism on this Far Cry cover? Just because the guy who's head the villain's hand is on is somewhat brown, it's suddenly racist? Perhaps this villain just fucking hates everyone and doesn't care about race. He could well be championing equality by hating everyone equally.

You know what IS fucking racist though? Calling something racist on these kinds of grounds. Equality is not just equal rights for all socially, but the idea that we are all one and the same beneath our skin. Doesn't matter if he's a fuckin' brown guy being oppressed by the villain, it matters that it's a HUMAN BEING being oppressed by the villain. That's where the drama comes from, not the colour of his skin.

This comes dangerously close to the extremely common argument of "You're the REAL racist for pointing out that racism exists."

You're right, race SHOULDN'T matter. But it does. A quick look at history and sociology shows that not only does race matter quite a bit, but also that racism is deeply ingrained in our society and our media. Most people who perpetuate bigotry honestly don't realise they're doing it since they can't see past their biases (due to them being human, and bias being an unconscious system.) Most people think that they're treating everybody equally, even when they're not. It's why the common "let's pretend race doesn't exist and just treat each other as equals" approach is ineffective at shifting the status quo towards something that actually resembles racial equality.

While you talk about the villain's potential motivations in the picture, the reality is that he can't have any motivations, because he's not real. The only people with motivations here are the people who put it together. More pertinent questions would be: What was the artist's motivation? Since this is the very first thing that Ubisoft showed regarding the content of the game, what where they trying to convey with the imagery, and why? What immediate emotional reaction are they trying to draw from the audience, and how is that achieved? Does the artist actually succeed, and are there any implications or subtext that might to be unintentional?

I'm not even arguing the picture is racist. I'm just arguing that if other people see racism where you don't, at least be a little more self aware than to dismiss it outright, and never, ever, assume that you might be too smart and too much of a good person to be biased, racially or otherwise. I spent pretty much all of my teenage years thinking I was too intelligent to be a bigot, and it's frustrating to see other people potentially fall into the same traps.

In conclusion, I think Far Cry 4 will be a really fun sandbox shooter and I hope I get to hunt a Yeti with a flamethrower.

Let me give you a hypothetical scenario: A woman gets hired to work in some office building. Her new, male boss acts like a patronizing asshole to her. Is the male boss a sexist?

If we're acting on a rational, objective basis here, instead of 'feelings', we have to say no, not necessarily. Since we don't know how he treats or views his male employees based on the information given. He may, in fact, be a patronizing asshole to everyone. Well, likewise we don't have the full picture of this villain either.

Avatar image for mr_creeper
mr_creeper

2458

Forum Posts

13

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Best Worth Reading in a while. Keep 'em up, Scoops.

Avatar image for conmulligan
conmulligan

2292

Forum Posts

11722

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

Edited By conmulligan

@twisted: I can't speak for everyone, but the gist of it is that a lot of people, myself included, don't have a ton of faith that Ubisoft will tell a nuanced story featuring a different culture after Far Cry 3 was so ham-fistedly executed. When the cover was revealed, and it seemed like Far Cry 4 might tread the same ground (white guy swoops in to save the hapless oppressed foreigners), it was easy to jump to conclusions.

Avatar image for twisted
Twisted

313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Twisted

@conmulligan: You know what? You're probably totally right. If you could give an explanation, I'd appreciate it.

To be honest, the racist villain part is all I seem to be reading, I could be missing a big part of this.

Avatar image for conmulligan
conmulligan

2292

Forum Posts

11722

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

@twisted: You completely misunderstand why people are apprehensive about the game. It has nothing to do with the fact that it may feature a racist villain.

Avatar image for twisted
Twisted

313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Twisted

Wait, so if a character in a game is racist, that makes the entire game racist? Interesting.

People have pointed out that pink-suit-guy is actually asian, when I look at it I still see a guy who could be from Europe. Let's say it is. Does it make the character potentially racist? Yes. Does it make the game potentially racist? No.

It's like saying Martin Scorsese movies are racist. It's like saying The Wire or The Sopranos are racist. Or Oz, because it depicts a gang of white supremacists picking on the black guys. The leader of that gang also enjoyed using one of the other white males as his bitch and raped him a couple of times. That didn't make the show homophobic. It's just reality.

People need to get a fucking grip. This is getting beyond ridiculous now.

Avatar image for kentonclay
KentonClay

363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By KentonClay

@lysergica33 said:

Am I the only one who doesn't see racism on this Far Cry cover? Just because the guy who's head the villain's hand is on is somewhat brown, it's suddenly racist? Perhaps this villain just fucking hates everyone and doesn't care about race. He could well be championing equality by hating everyone equally.

You know what IS fucking racist though? Calling something racist on these kinds of grounds. Equality is not just equal rights for all socially, but the idea that we are all one and the same beneath our skin. Doesn't matter if he's a fuckin' brown guy being oppressed by the villain, it matters that it's a HUMAN BEING being oppressed by the villain. That's where the drama comes from, not the colour of his skin.

This comes dangerously close to the extremely common argument of "You're the REAL racist for pointing out that racism exists."

You're right, race SHOULDN'T matter. But it does. A quick look at history and sociology shows that not only does race matter quite a bit, but also that racism is deeply ingrained in our society and our media. Most people who perpetuate bigotry honestly don't realise they're doing it since they can't see past their biases (due to them being human, and bias being an unconscious system.) Most people think that they're treating everybody equally, even when they're not. It's why the common "let's pretend race doesn't exist and just treat each other as equals" approach is ineffective at shifting the status quo towards something that actually resembles racial equality.

While you talk about the villain's potential motivations in the picture, the reality is that he can't have any motivations, because he's not real. The only people with motivations here are the people who put it together. More pertinent questions would be: What was the artist's motivation? Since this is the very first thing that Ubisoft showed regarding the content of the game, what where they trying to convey with the imagery, and why? What immediate emotional reaction are they trying to draw from the audience, and how is that achieved? Does the artist actually succeed, and are there any implications or subtext that might to be unintentional?

I'm not even arguing the picture is racist. I'm just arguing that if other people see racism where you don't, at least be a little more self aware than to dismiss it outright, and never, ever, assume that you might be too smart and too much of a good person to be biased, racially or otherwise. I spent pretty much all of my teenage years thinking I was too intelligent to be a bigot, and it's frustrating to see other people potentially fall into the same traps.

In conclusion, I think Far Cry 4 will be a really fun sandbox shooter and I hope I get to hunt a Yeti with a flamethrower.

Avatar image for gaminghooligan
gaminghooligan

1831

Forum Posts

30

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 1

Avatar image for spaceinsomniac
SpaceInsomniac

6353

Forum Posts

42

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By SpaceInsomniac

Am I the only one who doesn't see racism on this Far Cry cover? Just because the guy who's head the villain's hand is on is somewhat brown, it's suddenly racist? Perhaps this villain just fucking hates everyone and doesn't care about race. He could well be championing equality by hating everyone equally.

You know what IS fucking racist though? Calling something racist on these kinds of grounds. Equality is not just equal rights for all socially, but the idea that we are all one and the same beneath our skin. Doesn't matter if he's a fuckin' brown guy being oppressed by the villain, it matters that it's a HUMAN BEING being oppressed by the villain. That's where the drama comes from, not the colour of his skin.

Yep.

No Caption Provided

Avatar image for asiwassaying
Asiwassaying

45

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The people complaining FarCry is not handling sexuality with the nuances it deserve are the same people who see a blonde man with an ear ring in a pink suit and think he's gay. In the end the blonde guy could be gay, straight, bi, but guess what? in the game he probably won't fuck anybody, so he'll remain asexual following a long history of predomintantely asexual game characters.

Avatar image for somejerk
SomeJerk

4077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Sometimes you just gotta mindbreak a motherfucker and have him carry a live grenade while sobbing at your feet. If it's racist if that motherfucker happens to be of a different skin colour and I happen to be white, then you are the racist.

The idea in a lot of young white male american heads is that it's racist, even if said motherfucker is BieberHitlerBinladinCelineDion bad.

Avatar image for professoress
ProfessorEss

7962

Forum Posts

160

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

Edited By ProfessorEss

@video_game_king said:

@mormonwarrior said:

The week before Far Cry 4 was offending everyone, it was a harmless, goofy Nintendo game.

To be fair:

  1. Tomodachi Life was far more substantial.
  2. People weren't outraged...at first.

Also in the name of fairness, I almost completely ignored the Tomodachi story because I assumed it was just another Dead Island Bikini Bust or Tomb Raider Sex Moans.

Filling the air with wolf-cries and white-noise is, imho, doing more harm than good.

Avatar image for themanwithnoplan
TheManWithNoPlan

7843

Forum Posts

103

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 14

Edited By TheManWithNoPlan

Is it just me or does it seem like that in this age of social media there's a new gaming controversy every week? I don't know whether or not that means gaming's maturing to the point that it can incite so much meaningful conversation surrounding it's subject matter or if it's just the opposite. Remember the Dead island statue controversy? Now that was something worth getting upset over and discussing. Now we're at a piece of box art, from a game that was just announced, portraying a villain putting another dude in a perilous and compromised position.

If I recall the Far cry 3's box art did something similar. There's precedent for the direction of the box art's theme. The only difference being this one portrays a presumed white guy putting a non white guy, as said before, in a compromised position. As far as pulling it off, did Far Cry 3's box art pull it off? I don't remember anyone being upset about that, but now this one which follows the same theme causes a wide stir. To be honest, I don't really know how to respond to the explanation that people are only upset because of the hierarchy of minorities in the image. Don't get me wrong though. I can definitely can see why it upset people. So I'm not demonizing anyone in that respect. We're all entitled to our own opinion.

Anyways, I see that this revised box art surfaced shortly after the whole thing blew up. They labeled it "limited edition" and the original image is no longer available on Amazon. I can only assume other retail outlets have followed suit. Probably a smart decision in the long run. I doubt most of us will remember this whole thing by the time the game comes out, given the Internet's track record of short term memory.

Avatar image for asiwassaying
Asiwassaying

45

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@matoyak said:

@generic_username said:

I believe I fall into the shitty millennial category you're describing

Just to clarify what a "millennial" is*: If you are born between the years 1982 and 2004 (inclusive on both ends), then you are a millennial. (Oh, also: Generation Y is the same thing as "millennials", too, for the record).

*because everyone who uses it [almost exclusively in a derogatory way] seem to think it's people between the age of 15 and 25, when in fact, it is everyone between the ages of 10 and 32. It's such a wide range of people that the use of the term is completely meaningless.

Actually a generation is 15 years, it's

1945-60 Baby Boomers

1960-75 Generation X, No Future

1975-90 Generation Y, the "grunge" generation, Fuck Everything

1990-05 Millenials

2005-20 The internet generation

Avatar image for norsedudetr
norsedudetr

467

Forum Posts

330

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

This dude in the comments on that IGN piece got it right, in my opinion. Also, I used to listen to some IGN podcasts until Moriarty’s attitude soured me on them completely. He does not strike me as someone who thinks these things through.Staephendedalus12 hours ago

Jesus Christ. For the last time, the controversy isn't about the fact that racism is in the game. It's about HOW the developer employs racism in a sensationalist manner as a cliche or plot device. It's taking a very serious topic and cheapening it. And you all want gaming to be taken seriously? Grow the eff up. That includes you, Colin. This is why gaming is still seen as 'the immature douche' medium. In fact, whenever I'm on any forum and the topic of gaming not maturing is brought up, I'll have a reason why. I'll just link them to a random comment section on IGN. Or an article like this, in which Colin deflects, derails, and makes light of a serious issue to reassure all the 15 year olds on here that they don't need to grow up.

Avatar image for matoyak
Matoyak

485

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@generic_username said:

I believe I fall into the shitty millennial category you're describing

Just to clarify what a "millennial" is*: If you are born between the years 1982 and 2004 (inclusive on both ends), then you are a millennial. (Oh, also: Generation Y is the same thing as "millennials", too, for the record).

*because everyone who uses it [almost exclusively in a derogatory way] seem to think it's people between the age of 15 and 25, when in fact, it is everyone between the ages of 10 and 32. It's such a wide range of people that the use of the term is completely meaningless.

Avatar image for video_game_king
Video_Game_King

36563

Forum Posts

59080

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 14

The week before Far Cry 4 was offending everyone, it was a harmless, goofy Nintendo game.

To be fair:

  1. Tomodachi Life was far more substantial.
  2. People weren't outraged...at first.
Avatar image for mormonwarrior
MormonWarrior

2945

Forum Posts

577

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 21

The week before Far Cry 4 was offending everyone, it was a harmless, goofy Nintendo game. Must we always be in a rage about everything?

Avatar image for kentonclay
KentonClay

363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By KentonClay
@marokai said:

@psychedeliholic said:

Anyone who looks at the Far Cry art and doesn't see the potential racial/sexual issues implied therein is in serious need of remedial art history instruction.

Doing so at this point is literally judging something based on its cover. The irony of this from some people astonishes me.

No, it's judging a piece of art by the piece of art. There's some very clear imagery going on, no matter what's actually in the final product.

Maybe the game will be amazing and cleverly subversive. Or maybe it will be like the previous entry in the same series made by the same people. I know where I'd put my money.

Avatar image for lokilaufey
lokilaufey

306

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@milkman said:

My issue with the Far Cry 4 box art is that it looks like shit. Seriously, there is way too much going on in that image. It's ridiculous.

I saw someone say it looked like Sega Genesis game box art and that's not really too far off, honestly.

Avatar image for nickhead
nickhead

1305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 10

Turok was seriously so cool. I was too young to ever progress through the campaign without codes, but it was still a blast. The enemy and weapon designs were so captivating for a 10 year old.

Avatar image for abendlaender
abendlaender

3100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@oldirtybearon said:

@abendlaender said:

@oldirtybearon said:

@generic_username said:

@abendlaender said:

Wait, why is Far Cry 4 racist? Did I miss some infos, I only saw the cover up till now.

It's racist because everyone looked at the cover and assumed "white European man" when in reality the villain is a hyper flamboyant Burmese.

It's also homophobic because wearing loud colours with garish hair is a sign of homosexuality. Not, you know, eccentricity.

Even if he were a white european....isn't he the bad guy anyway? I mean....the bad guys can be racist right? They are, well....the bad guys. You're not supposed to like them. That's why they do bad things. Right? Right?

Did anybody complain that the Nazis in Wolfenstein were racist? Cause I'm pretty sure they are.

You should probably check your privilege and remember that it's not my job to educate you.

I should probably mention somewhere that this is what happens when an entire generation is raised to believe that feelings are more important than critical thinking. A lot of the people offended by this (and indeed are likely addicted to feeling oppressed) have no idea what "context" means. So while, yes, you're totally correct in assuming that villains should be villainous you have to remember that Americans with their "millennials" are overtly sensitive and absolutely shun confrontation.

I shouldn't say all Americans, however. It's mostly contained in wealthy, affluent, and predominately white suburbs/gentrified city centers.

I believe I fall into the shitty millennial category you're describing and saw the image and felt nothing of the sort. Don't blame it entirely on my generation, it's really just a subsection of internet culture that is causing the problems. They overreact, lots of people pay attention, this is seen as positive reinforcement, so they overreact to the next thing.

Problem is that stuff like is can really harm criticism of actually racist content. If you cry wolf every time you see a dog, people will just get tired of it. So when an actual wolf arrives nobody wants to listen anymore. Saying "this is racist and homophobic" because a seemingly white guy in a pink suite is an asshole to a brown guy without any other context is just plain overreacting. I've dug a little deeper into the criticism of this and there are a sizeable bunch of people who already condem this game as homophobic cause they believe the main guy is gay and portraying the villain as gay is seen as homophobic by some. And this stuff really needs to stop. If the character is portrayed well (which we obviously don't know yet) it shouldn't matter if he is gay or not. He can be a fantastic villain or he could be a horrible stereotype wether he is gay or not. We literally don't know anything about the story of the game or this guy. It could be horrible, racist and homophobic. But we don't know. Save criticism for when it's actually needed or you might find that you lost all people willing to listen. And that shouldn't happen cause it's important that stuff like this gets called out.

Avatar image for lysergica33
Lysergica33

601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Am I the only one who doesn't see racism on this Far Cry cover? Just because the guy who's head the villain's hand is on is somewhat brown, it's suddenly racist? Perhaps this villain just fucking hates everyone and doesn't care about race. He could well be championing equality by hating everyone equally.

You know what IS fucking racist though? Calling something racist on these kinds of grounds. Equality is not just equal rights for all socially, but the idea that we are all one and the same beneath our skin. Doesn't matter if he's a fuckin' brown guy being oppressed by the villain, it matters that it's a HUMAN BEING being oppressed by the villain. That's where the drama comes from, not the colour of his skin.

Avatar image for generic_username
generic_username

943

Forum Posts

1494

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 7

@abendlaender said:

@oldirtybearon said:

@generic_username said:

@abendlaender said:

Wait, why is Far Cry 4 racist? Did I miss some infos, I only saw the cover up till now.

It's racist because everyone looked at the cover and assumed "white European man" when in reality the villain is a hyper flamboyant Burmese.

It's also homophobic because wearing loud colours with garish hair is a sign of homosexuality. Not, you know, eccentricity.

Even if he were a white european....isn't he the bad guy anyway? I mean....the bad guys can be racist right? They are, well....the bad guys. You're not supposed to like them. That's why they do bad things. Right? Right?

Did anybody complain that the Nazis in Wolfenstein were racist? Cause I'm pretty sure they are.

You should probably check your privilege and remember that it's not my job to educate you.

I should probably mention somewhere that this is what happens when an entire generation is raised to believe that feelings are more important than critical thinking. A lot of the people offended by this (and indeed are likely addicted to feeling oppressed) have no idea what "context" means. So while, yes, you're totally correct in assuming that villains should be villainous you have to remember that Americans with their "millennials" are overtly sensitive and absolutely shun confrontation.

I shouldn't say all Americans, however. It's mostly contained in wealthy, affluent, and predominately white suburbs/gentrified city centers.

I believe I fall into the shitty millennial category you're describing and saw the image and felt nothing of the sort. Don't blame it entirely on my generation, it's really just a subsection of internet culture that is causing the problems. They overreact, lots of people pay attention, this is seen as positive reinforcement, so they overreact to the next thing.

Avatar image for mrfluke
mrfluke

6260

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

@marokai said:

Sessler's sort of auto-biographical musings piece was interesting to read, and brought back fond memories of how awesome he was back in the day on television, and how much I enjoyed following him back then, but it really only solidified more than ever in my mind that it's impossible for some people to really view him through a modern lens.

The picture included here to represent Sessler? That's the Sessler people remember. That's the Sessler people want to like, because that's when they were ten years younger and and Sessler was a lot softer, goofier, and focused more on just playing games. That Sessler was great, and I practically revered him for his older work. Nothing that's happened in the last few years has managed to tarnish the great stuff Adam did on X-Play and that show (pre-2008, at least) will always have a special place in my heart no matter what. But that's not the Sessler that exists anymore, and some people really haven't been able to deal with that.

The end of that piece doesn't paint a flattering picture of himself, either. It resembles the words of a bitter and tired man who never learned how to deal with the internet, who never understood that maybe he might've fucked up from time to time, who will never have learned the right lesson of the last couple years of his life, and never even tried. He sounds like a person who wanted to clock in, get his target views, cash his checks, and not deal with anyone else. He's a person who never adapted to life after X-Play and suffered no consequences for his weird fits and mistakes, over time seemingly always coming to the conclusion that he was unjustly persecuted, and will apparently live the rest of his career in the self-congratulating bubble of his Twitter friends.

I genuinely think that's a tragedy. He's proven he can be much better in the past.

you sir, nailed my thoughts exactly.

Avatar image for christilton
christilton

191

Forum Posts

53

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By christilton

@lurkero said:

Anyone who paid attention to the plot of Far Cry 3 should very much be concerned about the imagery of the Far Cry 4 cover. I won't jump to conclusions until I actually witness the plot, but the previous Far Cry games do not provide confidence that the fourth one will be much better. I think the protagonist is a native of the region this time so that at least provides some positive belief against the "helpless natives" needing to be saved by the "European White male" just passing through.

Exactly. And it wasn't even just a "European White Male." He (and his co-horts) are the most selfish and unqualified white people on Earth for the task at hand. I don't know what the writer thought he was writing, but it wasn't what he claimed it was in post release interviews. I loved almost everything else about Far Cry 3, though.

Avatar image for redravn
RedRavN

418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I know everyone here is mostly in agreement, but this whole backlash over the farcry 4 cover is completely absurd. Especially considering the antagonist is clearly either mixed race asian or some asian (I guess officially he is burmese). Also, I know this might just be shocking to some people but homosexuality is not a big deal in that part of the world at least in tibet, nepal, bhutan etc. True Buddhist cultures couldn't give two shits about a persons sexual orientation, although there are strongly defined traditional roles for men and women. But the modern himalaya region is one of the most accepting places and full of wonderful people. Its like basically the opposite of texas.

I really think if ubisoft had any balls they would have made the antagonist obviously chinese. But people would either not get it because so many have no idea of the history of the region or they would think it was racist, despite the fact that china has almost ruined the native culture of that area of the world. If your not paying attention think 6000+ monasteries, 1000s of years of historical note keeping and relics, and the sovereignty of the dalai lama destroyed. This is all in the name of selling mopeds, prepared food, televisions etc. and building a rail system into mongolia to get all the copper they are now mining there.

Also I find it incredibly absurd that people picked up on the characters flamboyancy and western affect and were angry about that while the character is sitting on a statue of buddha with his head severed. Interesting imagery there for sure.

That notion leads me to hope that these implied concepts are explored well in the game. I have no problem with it at all but I hope the execution is more deft then in farcry 3. In that game exploring a tribal society and exploring what being a warrior means to those kinds of societies was interesting but it all felt too cursory. About half way through I was thinking "whats the point of this" and then the game goes completely off the rails towards the end. So if they are trying something similar with farcry 4 I hope they just either make it window dressing or go strait for the jugular.

Avatar image for hailinel
Hailinel

25785

Forum Posts

219681

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 28

@hassun said:

@hailinel: I don't really count the MMOs as main entries to be honest.

And even without Nomura the soulless, plasticy Jpop style of the characters is ever present. That's not just a problem of the Final Fantasy series either...

There's nothing soulless about the designs from my perspective, and I'm having a very hard time understanding where the J-Pop descriptor comes into play. Seriously, in what way is Lightning's (or anyone else's) appearance "J-Pop"? I feel like you don't know what you're talking about.

Avatar image for hassun
hassun

10300

Forum Posts

191

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

@hailinel: I don't really count the MMOs as main entries to be honest.

And even without Nomura the soulless, plasticy Jpop style of the characters is ever present. That's not just a problem of the Final Fantasy series either...

Avatar image for dedbeet
DedBeet

756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 4

@patrickklepek:

Coming to define what my role is at Giant Bomb, a website built on collaboration, has been tough. Not everything has worked.

I think it's remarkable how much has worked, especially since you've only been out of the office for a year. Seeing you and the site adapt to your departure gives me great hope for GBNY.

Yeah, I've been pretty blown away by how much content has come out of Chicago. Patrick has defined what the role of the offsite Bomber should be. It'll be interesting to see how Vinny and Alex rise to the challenge Patrick has presented.

Avatar image for edmundus
edmundus

698

Forum Posts

739

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Crusader Kings 2 would be excellent for a regular feature.

Avatar image for mooseymcman
MooseyMcMan

12789

Forum Posts

5577

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

@joshwent:

Well, as a member of the LGBT community, and a fan of Saints Row, I'll say that I'm offended that his clothing (which looks purple to me) would be associated with that. (I'm not actually offended.)

@grantheaslip: I saw that comment from someone else first, honestly, so I can't claim ownership. And I didn't say I think they are going to create a homophobic character, I'm NERVOUS they're going to make a homophobic character. The last game's only homosexual character was a rapist-psychopath, and then his rape victim is basically just acquired as "part of your friend-crew" and the issue never comes up again. Considering the numerous race issues in Far Cry 3 detailed countless times circa the Game of the Year 2012 period, forgive me for being nervous that they might be insensitive once more.

Despite playing Far Cry 3 to completion, I can happily say that I remember so little about the story that I had completely forgotten about anything rape-related. I do remember the jokes about how people just assumed the German guy was evil.

Avatar image for amafi
amafi

1502

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

@patrickklepek: Man, crusader kings 2 is such a scary game. I love it, but learning it is kind of rough.

Not sure I'd recommend filming the first few hours of looking at it. Also consider looking up some video tutorials on the basics on youtube, there are some really good ones. Personally I found Crusader kings 2 101 very helpful for getting started.

The CK2 Wiki also has a lot of very good information.

Good luck.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b43dadb9061b
deactivated-5b43dadb9061b

1649

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This Far Cry 4 controversy bullshit is getting out of control.

This type of crap is only going to get worse.

Avatar image for brasshi
BrassHi

35

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@patrickklepek after reading Brendan Sinclair's article about the Far Cry 4 cover I agreed in general with the point he was trying to make, that games have to handle delicate material in a mature manner. However, Brendan using this cover to make a point about the difficulty Far Cry has with handling race makes it seem like he was attributing qualities to it that were simply not there. Using a cover that most people didn't find in any way racist weakened what is a legitimate argument.

Avatar image for avatar
Avatar

34

Forum Posts

91

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Crusader Kings is a great game that I think you would make fine content with, but you really don't want to record yourself going in blind.

Avatar image for alexandersheen
AlexanderSheen

5150

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By AlexanderSheen

This Far Cry 4 controversy bullshit is getting out of control.

Avatar image for spaceinsomniac
SpaceInsomniac

6353

Forum Posts

42

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3


tl;dr the antagonist is Burmese and the protagonist is most likely Nepalese.

Boom.

Boom indeed. It means nothing though. Every aspect of Far Cry 4 will be put under a microscope by social justice bloggers. There is no way to win.

Patrick disappoints me when he chimes in on stuff like this. He should be smarter than that; But as long as he and others keep putting things on the internet knowing that their every word is being judged, they will continue to play it safe.

That can be read a couple of different ways, but I'm assuming you mean the following: As long as bloggers are hypercritical of female and minority video game characters, we're going to continue to see game developers "play it safe" more often than not, when it comes time to design their characters.

"knowing that their every word is being judged" refers to developers, not bloggers, right?

If that's what you meant, then yes, I think you're right. It's a sad type of catch-22 when it comes to this topic.

Avatar image for draugen
Draugen

1007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 20

@little_socrates: Wouldn't it make way more sense to wait until we know *anything* about the game before jumping to those kinds of awful scenarios? I see no reason to assume Ubisoft Montreal would be make an "extremely homophobic" character, and I frankly think it's a bit insulting to speculate about the degree to which the game's writers might be monsters without any evidence to back it up.

Are you mad? This is the internet. We don't have time to wait for context or facts! You can't be first to slam something as insensitive, if you have to wait to see what you're actually critizising. Take a leap of faith. There are no consequenses for being wrong.

Avatar image for wacwam
WacWam

23

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I thought the guy on the cover looked like a young Anderson Cooper that rummaged through a trunk filled with Japanese/Korean boy band outfits.

Avatar image for spaceinsomniac
SpaceInsomniac

6353

Forum Posts

42

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By SpaceInsomniac

@marokai said:

@psychedeliholic said:

Anyone who looks at the Far Cry art and doesn't see the potential racial/sexual issues implied therein is in serious need of remedial art history instruction.

Doing so at this point is literally judging something based on its cover. The irony of this from some people astonishes me.

With people looking to find something offensive in just about everything lately--at this point, even extending into things that could be in a video game--I can't say that I'm too surprised. I'm also not surprised that this non-issue made it into one of Patrick's articles.

@greggd said:

@crysack said:

@r3dt1d3 said:

The reaction to the Far Cry 4 cover saddens me. Guess what, it's a light skinned guy subverting the locals. Far Cry 3 was the exact same thing after a point in the story. No one had a problem with Hoyt, that I noticed, but this character we know nothing about and the scenario he is depicted in is too far?

Despite the fact that Kotaku and the like still haven't realised this, the antagonist in the pink suit isn't actually a white dude. If they had bothered to do their research, they'd realise that a plot summary has been leaked on Uplay, and I quote:

'Hidden in the majestic Himalayas lies Kyrat, a country steeped in tradition and violence. You are Ajay Ghale. Traveling to Kyrat to fulfill your mother's dying wish, you find yourself caught up in a civil war to overthrow the oppressive regime of dictator Pagan Min.'

tl;dr the antagonist is Burmese and the protagonist is most likely Nepalese.

Boom.

Boom indeed. It means nothing though. Every aspect of Far Cry 4 will be put under a microscope by social justice bloggers. There is no way to win.

Avatar image for oldirtybearon
Oldirtybearon

5626

Forum Posts

86

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Oldirtybearon

@abendlaender said:

@oldirtybearon said:

@generic_username said:

@abendlaender said:

Wait, why is Far Cry 4 racist? Did I miss some infos, I only saw the cover up till now.

It's racist because everyone looked at the cover and assumed "white European man" when in reality the villain is a hyper flamboyant Burmese.

It's also homophobic because wearing loud colours with garish hair is a sign of homosexuality. Not, you know, eccentricity.

Even if he were a white european....isn't he the bad guy anyway? I mean....the bad guys can be racist right? They are, well....the bad guys. You're not supposed to like them. That's why they do bad things. Right? Right?

Did anybody complain that the Nazis in Wolfenstein were racist? Cause I'm pretty sure they are.

You should probably check your privilege and remember that it's not my job to educate you.

I should probably mention somewhere that this is what happens when an entire generation is raised to believe that feelings are more important than critical thinking. A lot of the people offended by this (and indeed are likely addicted to feeling oppressed) have no idea what "context" means. So while, yes, you're totally correct in assuming that villains should be villainous you have to remember that Americans with their "millennials" are overtly sensitive and absolutely shun confrontation.

I shouldn't say all Americans, however. It's mostly contained in wealthy, affluent, and predominately white suburbs/gentrified city centers.

Avatar image for abendlaender
abendlaender

3100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@generic_username said:

@abendlaender said:

Wait, why is Far Cry 4 racist? Did I miss some infos, I only saw the cover up till now.

It's racist because everyone looked at the cover and assumed "white European man" when in reality the villain is a hyper flamboyant Burmese.

It's also homophobic because wearing loud colours with garish hair is a sign of homosexuality. Not, you know, eccentricity.

Even if he were a white european....isn't he the bad guy anyway? I mean....the bad guys can be racist right? They are, well....the bad guys. You're not supposed to like them. That's why they do bad things. Right? Right?
Did anybody complain that the Nazis in Wolfenstein were racist? Cause I'm pretty sure they are.

Avatar image for bradgrenz
bradgrenz

90

Forum Posts

36

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

I hope the protagonist of Far Cry 4 turns out to be a gay woman of color so everyone's heads explode.

Avatar image for oldirtybearon
Oldirtybearon

5626

Forum Posts

86

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Oldirtybearon

@generic_username said:

@abendlaender said:

Wait, why is Far Cry 4 racist? Did I miss some infos, I only saw the cover up till now.

It's racist because everyone looked at the cover and assumed "white European man" when in reality the villain is a hyper flamboyant Burmese.

It's also homophobic because wearing loud colours with garish hair is a sign of homosexuality. Not, you know, eccentricity.

Avatar image for zfubarz
zFUBARz

719

Forum Posts

178

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@patrickklepek You damn well better do a Crusader Kings 2 feature. The fact that Idle Thumbs bailed out after a few nights still bugs me.