Killzone 3, Rachet and Clank: A4O, Dragon Age 2, Duke Nukem Forever (though I never thought that one would be any good)

@kingando420 said:

badger badger badger badger, badger badger badger badger, badger badger badger badger, mushroom mushroom!

Snaaaaaake! Ohh It's a snaaaaake!

But really, I played BF3 on a really good PC at my friend's today, and it looked great, but it was kinda boring. They make a big deal about 64 players, but when I played I barely found many people. It's kinda like how MAG was, sure there was 256 people, but you would really be playing 32 vs 32. But in BF3, the maps are so large, that you never see many people.

but I wanted more, and any true battlefield fan would agree with me

Troll.

Don't get me wrong, I'm a big big big bf fan, I'm 40 years old

You write like you're 12.

Nothing compares to this great series and it is a clear sign that PC games are infinitely better than anything on consoles

Troll again. And also intense bias with no clear view of reality.

to think of all those little console fanboys out there who will laugh in my face when CoD comes out

So because consoles are my preferred way to play video games, i'm "little", and inferior to you? I've played CoD for years and I have no interest in MW3...and I own BF3. I've played quite a few Battlefield games (on PC too! Whoa, I know right? I play console and PC???). I like the mulitplayer quite a lot, in fact, too.