fuck yeah motion blur

Wow that looks like a CGi movie, actually i think this mod is exactly what we can expect from the next generation of consoles (usually the pc reaches ''next-gen'' first then consoles tag along afterward)

That is absolutely incredible, I reckon we'll be on the ps12 by the time developers get leaves right though!

It looks really pretty. Unmatched visually. 
 
But completely unplayable for me. That amount of "jerky" motions and motion blur would absolutely destroy me.

Very impressive greenery and scared-ass-dudes-faces, though the camera was way too loose for my taste, was getting major motion sickness. Also felt like the character was maybe 18 inches tall.

Pretty impressive

Not impressed. Show me a Crysis mod that can accurately recreate the visual fidelity of Ice Climbers for the NES and I might scoff less.

guy's head bobbles around to much when he is running, no one runs like that unless one of those koreans stuck a machete in his neck.

Holy fuck, so much motion blur. 
Also, having not played Crysis can you explain how this mod is better than the regular game? To here people talk about it this is what I was expecting Crysis would look like.

" Not impressed. Show me a Crysis mod that can accurately recreate the visual fidelity of Ice Climbers for the NES and I might scoff less. "

" guy's head bobbles around to much when he is running, no one runs like that unless one of those koreans stuck a machete in his neck. "

I think Crysis is best with fairly minor tweaks, the CCC with some extra stuff.  Those blur effects are extreme to the point of fucking up the way the effect looks.  It was never intended to be used that way.  I don't understand what you see in that mod.  Regular Crysis looks way better.
 
Anyways if the next generation of consoles doesn't regularly pump out superior-to-Crysis graphics I'll be very surprised and disappointed.

Looks like Crysis to me.
 
Albeit with mad motion blur, crazy camera rolls, a sharpening TOD, and bumped up particle effects/fog, all of which from a gameplay perspective make the game worse.

Is the OP impressed by the somewhat accurate movement of the player character or by all of that fucking motion blur? I don't see how the head-bob and awkward animations could do anything but hinder gameplay. Seriously. How the fuck do you aim with all of that going on? I didn't see any crosshairs or a reason to play Crysis again.  
 
Looked pretty good. Still pretty jagged though.

Great find, this is incredible, if unplayable-looking.

that was really sexy...  i really feel like throwing my ps3 in the trash

I like it, if these graphics were used for battlefield 3.

I don't even know how he knew what was going on, I can't keep up. It's so good it's bad. It's like having a cock that's too big, you can't do anything with it :( 
 
besides jerk off

Too much jerk, too much motion blur for my tastes. I wouldn't want to play that. I don't even really care about graphics anymore; if the game is good enough, I don't need to see every detail on every object in the game. It's a waste of resources in my opinion.

It looks like Crysis with motion-blur taken to the extreme, a sharp increase in contrast, and some tweaks to the camera. 
 
I prefer regular-ass crysis, to be perfectly honest. That looked far too loose, jerky and blurry.

" @supermike6: It's because of people like you that we only get one Crysis, and all other games that don't bother pushing PC hardware.  Crysis should be one of the top selling games of all time, but sadly it's not.  When 8800GTX cards can play current gen games at decent settings and resolutions, you know something went wrong.  >.> "

" @supermike6: It's because of people like you that we only get one Crysis, and all other games that don't bother pushing PC hardware.  Crysis should be one of the top selling games of all time, but sadly it's not.  When 8800GTX cards can play current gen games at decent settings and resolutions, you know something went wrong.  >.> "

Game looks really pretty, although borderline unplayable. The amount of blur at around 1:15 and the angle his head is tilted is ridiculous.

   @KaosAngel: I agree it looks amazing, for sure. But Crysis has always looked that way without any mods... The main reason it looks different is because of a high contrast/sharpening/desaturation filter on everything. They call it a TOD in Crysis terms for some reason.
 
 The way the guy plays the game is the part that's impressing you; very cinematic. 

It would be nice for games to at least include this kind of gameplay as an option. Instead of making games like COD have inhumanly accurate AI, they should just have extreme difficulties employ this sort of thing. I don't get motion sick though, so possibly I'm a minority here.

Looks neat but it's still Crysis so I have no interest in it. Also holy fuck motion blur. When your gun has a separate outline you are doing something wrong.

Cheese and fries! I feel less drunk after a 40 of malt liquor than after watching that. 
Someone should release a "make crysis fun" mod.

Its not that impressive man. The camera is absolutely horrible, you can see it breaking up all over the place like Diamond said which is just ugly, and even if it wasnt all janky like that it still wouldn't be that impressive because the view distance is laughable, the entire jungle is smoke.  
 
I will take vanilla DX9 crysis over that anyday. 

There's a seriously excess of blur there and it looks like there's a very short draw distance but the actual in-game world looks beautiful, very impressive.

Well, it looks like Crysis did 3 years ago, just a little darker, grainier and it has the insane motion blur I can't play with. But it's still unmatched in graphics even though it's that old, which is a bit sad, to be honest.

First time seeing Crysis or something? Check out Crysis 2 man.

I actually think that's rather ugly, and the scripted jerky camera movements are off putting. In terms of graphics configs, Real Lifesys looks a hell of a lot better than Extreme Quality.

" @KaosAngel said:

" @supermike6: It's because of people like you that we only get one Crysis, and all other games that don't bother pushing PC hardware.  Crysis should be one of the top selling games of all time, but sadly it's not.  When 8800GTX cards can play current gen games at decent settings and resolutions, you know something went wrong.  >.> "

I love when a good looking game doesn't need ridiculous hardware to run properly. "

There are so many unique looks for Crysis at this point though. This is my favourite.
 

" @supermike6: It's because of people like you that we only get one Crysis, and all other games that don't bother pushing PC hardware.  Crysis should be one of the top selling games of all time, but sadly it's not.  When 8800GTX cards can play current gen games at decent settings and resolutions, you know something went wrong.  >.> "

Very high settings is my favorite. Imagine this in motion if these are only screenshots.
  

" @csl316:  $2000 isn't a reasonable estimate of the cost of PC gaming though. $1000 is more accurate for a high end rig, but you could still build cheaper. Of course you can get PCs that cost more than $3000 but it seems super expensive from the outside. If you know what you're looking at then it's not so expensive. More expensive than console gaming though, almost always. I make my money back though on signifacntly cheaper games I figure. "

" @SBYM said:

" @KaosAngel said:

" @supermike6: It's because of people like you that we only get one Crysis, and all other games that don't bother pushing PC hardware.  Crysis should be one of the top selling games of all time, but sadly it's not.  When 8800GTX cards can play current gen games at decent settings and resolutions, you know something went wrong.  >.> "

I love when a good looking game doesn't need ridiculous hardware to run properly. "

You can play Crysis on a huge variety of machines, and still have it look great. Its actually one of the better optimized engines out there, for how damned good it looks. Maybe at ultra settings with high AA and at 1920 or hight resolutions you can't play it well on any computer, but the game looks great on medium-high settings. I'd rather games have a big range of computers going from midrange to top of the line than a small range of medium to high end. Games like Crysis and Doom in their respective times have pushed forward technology, encouraging more powerful hardware to be produced and better engines created for games. "

check out those Grapx!!!
 
 
looks like something they would show as teaser from E3.

Time. It takes time. And a computer that can generate that level of craziness. 

" It looks really pretty. Unmatched visually.  But completely unplayable for me. That amount of "jerky" motions and motion blur would absolutely destroy me. "

 
Vanilla Crysis looks better.
 
Also, play Crysis, it's quite good. As shown in the video, being able to traverse the terrain and kill in interesting ways like that is a lot of fun.