Are gfx being deliberately dumbed down?

  • 69 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for tobako
Tobako

79

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I got the game pre ordered and I'm not a gfx whore but since I watched the latest vaati video on youtube, I'm once again feeling concerned about the overall quality of the game, I've seen some screens before that looked just bad but also gameplay footage that looked quite good but now seeing a video that just shows NO shadows on characters leaves me really confused.

Avatar image for justin258
Justin258

16686

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 8

We're dumbing down graphics now? How can you make graphics for stupid people? If anything, you have to make graphics look good for stupid people.

Yes, a game that is coming out on a last generation console, even one that's still going strong at the moment, is going to look kinda bad. I think what I've seen of it looks really, really good, from an aesthetic perspective at least.

Avatar image for evanbower
evanbower

1253

Forum Posts

221

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 9

@believer258 said:

I think what I've seen of it looks really, really good, from an aesthetic perspective at least.

I'll stand by you on that 100%.

Avatar image for soldierg654342
soldierg654342

1900

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By soldierg654342

Neither of the Souls games have been graphical powerhouses. Demon's Souls has muddy textures and is jaggy as shit, and while Dark Souls has (marginally) better textures and graphics overall, it suffers for it in performance. Not that Demon's Souls ran exceptionally well either.

It seems that From is aiming for stable performance this time around, which is a good thing, as the framerate actually effects gameplay. Which I spuppose is a really round about way of saying "Yes they are."

Also keep in mind that it's being compared now to games on much more powerful consoles.

Avatar image for reefergladness
ReeferGladness

28

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I feel that it looks pretty damn good, I have only played on the PS4 once or twice so i've not been spoiled by the graphics yet.

For a ps3 game it definitely looks good.

Avatar image for mike
mike

18011

Forum Posts

23067

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 6

I think it looks pretty good. Also there was a point about a month ago where it seemed like a new build showed up on the demo circuit and all of a sudden the lighting went insane. I've seen the lighting change at least twice or more during development and that's only what From has shown off, but based on what we have seen already, I think Dark Souls 2 looks incredible.

Avatar image for aetheldod
Aetheldod

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#7  Edited By Aetheldod

When I played the network test and all was great ... hardly doubt that the stuff became any worse and logicly things will improve , so there is no fear from my part

Avatar image for steadying
Steadying

1902

Forum Posts

8

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#8  Edited By Steadying

I think it kinda just looks like Dark Souls. Which is to say kinda bad but also kinda good at the same time some how.

Avatar image for korwin
korwin

3919

Forum Posts

25

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

This is a strange first post.

Avatar image for steadying
Steadying

1902

Forum Posts

8

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#10  Edited By Steadying

@korwin: Which is why I'm definitely not clicking that link. :P

Avatar image for tobako
Tobako

79

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11  Edited By Tobako

We're dumbing down graphics now? How can you make graphics for stupid people? If anything, you have to make graphics look good for stupid people.

Yes, a game that is coming out on a last generation console, even one that's still going strong at the moment, is going to look kinda bad. I think what I've seen of it looks really, really good, from an aesthetic perspective at least.

LOL seriously? That's beside the point anyway...

@mb: That shot definitely looks great and I saw other footage that looks equally as good but shadows look totally disabled in some places, that's what I was talking about, like at the end of vaati's video. The area in the video doesn't even seem heavy at all and not only the character but also the enemies display no shadows. I don't have a huge concern about graphics but that is something impossible not to notice in a PS3 game and I wonder if it's just bugged or in purpose due to framerate issues. Also I'm wondering if most of the best looking footage is being taken from the pc version because if that's so, I'd rather wait and buy it instead.

Avatar image for extomar
EXTomar

5047

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

...what does this post mean??? How do people see this strange stuff in pre-release material that works themselves into a frenzy?

Avatar image for tobako
Tobako

79

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@extomar: Vaat,i if I remember correctly, said that he got his hands on the final version of the game so I'm assuming what he's showing is final.

Avatar image for justin258
Justin258

16686

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 8

#14  Edited By Justin258

@tobako said:
@believer258 said:

We're dumbing down graphics now? How can you make graphics for stupid people? If anything, you have to make graphics look good for stupid people.

Yes, a game that is coming out on a last generation console, even one that's still going strong at the moment, is going to look kinda bad. I think what I've seen of it looks really, really good, from an aesthetic perspective at least.

LOL seriously? That's beside the point anyway...

@mb: That shot definitely looks great and I saw other footage that looks equally as good but shadows look totally disabled in some places, that's what I was talking about, like at the end of vaati's video. The area in the video doesn't even seem heavy at all and not only the character but also the enemies display no shadows. I don't have a huge concern about graphics but that is something impossible not to notice in a PS3 game and I wonder if it's just bugged or in purpose due to framerate issues. Also I'm wondering if most of the best looking footage is being taken from the pc version because if that's so, I'd rather wait and buy it instead.

How is what I said beside the point? You can't really dumb down graphics, as graphics aren't something that requires mental energy to understand. You just look at them.

Shadows are fairly taxing on hardware. They probably turned them off to keep the framerate playable. It's really not a big deal. Besides, I see shadows in the picture that MB posted. I really don't know what picture you're looking at.

Again, remember, the PS3 came out in 2006. That's ancient as far as computer technology goes.

Avatar image for aetheldod
Aetheldod

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#15  Edited By Aetheldod

@tobako: Saw the vid and I say you are bonkers ... there are clearly shadows were they need to be and no shadows were non will occur. You are worrying over nothing.

Avatar image for sterling
Sterling

4134

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#17  Edited By Sterling

The game looks great. This topic is silly. I mean look at this, its fantastic!

Dark Souls II: A king's Field
Dark Souls II: A king's Field

Avatar image for tobako
Tobako

79

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@believer258: I said it was beside the point because I wasn't necessarily saying the gfx were bad, was just saying shadows looked disabled here and there, and while you tried to imply that I was stupid you called yourself and everyone else in your sentence.

Apologies tough to everyone else, the link I posted isn't working, here's vaati's gameplay video I talked about, beware of little spoilers http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tYOS12UCgg

Avatar image for justin258
Justin258

16686

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 8

@tobako said:

@believer258: I said it was beside the point because I wasn't necessarily saying the gfx were bad, was just saying shadows looked disabled here and there, and while you tried to imply that I was stupid you called yourself and everyone else in your sentence.

Apologies tough to everyone else, the link I posted isn't working, here's vaati's gameplay video I talked about, beware of little spoilers http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tYOS12UCgg

For the record, I wasn't calling you stupid. I was saying that you cannot dumb down graphics.

Avatar image for humanity
Humanity

21858

Forum Posts

5738

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 16

Neither of the Souls games have been graphical powerhouses. Demon's Souls has muddy textures and is jaggy as shit, and while Dark Souls has (marginally) better textures and graphics overall, it suffers for it in performance. Not that Demon's Souls ran exceptionally well either.

It seems that From is aiming for stable performance this time around, which is a good thing, as the framerate actually effects gameplay. Which I spuppose is a really round about way of saying "Yes they are."

Also keep in mind that it's being compared now to games on much more powerful consoles.

Personally I thought the graphics looked better in Demon's somehow. When I booted up Dark Souls for the first time I kept thinking something was wrong with my TV because there was a weird blur effect going on.

Avatar image for sweep
sweep

10887

Forum Posts

3660

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 14

#21 sweep  Moderator

Considering the amount of time I've spent playing Nidhogg and Super Hexagon, vs the titles currently available on PS4 and Xbox One, I'm going to go ahead and say that super insane graphics aren't that integral to what makes games like Dark Souls appealing.

Controversy!

Avatar image for fredchuckdave
Fredchuckdave

10824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Dark Souls is an incredible looking game, all signs point to Dark Souls 2 looking better; but there will probably be some framerate issues since they're pushing old systems to their limit. But I mean if you really want nicer graphics you can just play shitty new console games instead and not worry about Dark Souls for another 2-3 years.

Avatar image for Krockett
Krockett

524

Forum Posts

347

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

I dunno man, that vista after completing the tuturial looks pretty good from what people are saying.

No Caption Provided

Avatar image for fredchuckdave
Fredchuckdave

10824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#24  Edited By Fredchuckdave

@8bit_archer: That dude's shield's sword is praising the sun

Avatar image for mirado
Mirado

2557

Forum Posts

37

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25  Edited By Mirado

If they can keep the frame rate from taking a nose dive, I'll gladly sacrifice some graphical fidelity as a trade.

...of course, this is From Software we're talking about, and I don't think they've made a game in the past five years that never tanks in the FPS department. Demon's Souls, Dark Souls, and both Armored Cores all had shitty frame rates in that time period.

Avatar image for alexw00d
AlexW00d

7604

Forum Posts

3686

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@humanity said:

@soldierg654342 said:

Neither of the Souls games have been graphical powerhouses. Demon's Souls has muddy textures and is jaggy as shit, and while Dark Souls has (marginally) better textures and graphics overall, it suffers for it in performance. Not that Demon's Souls ran exceptionally well either.

It seems that From is aiming for stable performance this time around, which is a good thing, as the framerate actually effects gameplay. Which I spuppose is a really round about way of saying "Yes they are."

Also keep in mind that it's being compared now to games on much more powerful consoles.

Personally I thought the graphics looked better in Demon's somehow. When I booted up Dark Souls for the first time I kept thinking something was wrong with my TV because there was a weird blur effect going on.

That's called upscaling :/

Avatar image for yummylee
Yummylee

24646

Forum Posts

193025

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 88

User Lists: 24

Neither of the Souls games have been graphical powerhouses. Demon's Souls has muddy textures and is jaggy as shit, and while Dark Souls has (marginally) better textures and graphics overall, it suffers for it in performance. Not that Demon's Souls ran exceptionally well either.

It seems that From is aiming for stable performance this time around, which is a good thing, as the framerate actually effects gameplay. Which I spuppose is a really round about way of saying "Yes they are."

Also keep in mind that it's being compared now to games on much more powerful consoles.

While it's true that they're not graphical powerhouses, their art style does enough to still give them a boost in looking pretty damn fine. That, and they have some great animation work to make up for all of it, with Dark Souls II's animations looking to be even smoother.

Avatar image for karkarov
Karkarov

3385

Forum Posts

3096

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@sterling said:

The game looks great. This topic is silly. I mean look at this, its fantastic!

Dark Souls II: A king's Field
Dark Souls II: A king's Field

Yo dude cool and all but as a King's Field fan I hate every time some person comes into a Dark Souls thread and makes a joke at it's expense. How easily everyone forgets (or never knew in the first place) the only reason Demon's Souls happened is because Sony went to From Software and said "We want you to make a current gen game inspired by King's Field." Without Demon's there is no Dark, and without King's Field you would have never gotten either. Also King's Field 4 (the game pictured here) is still more atmospheric and in my opinion nails the "tension" better than any of the Souls games.

In other news those concerned about this or FPS problems can always wait for the PC release.

Avatar image for rvone
RVonE

5027

Forum Posts

8740

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

@believer258: In DSIII they will dumb down the sound design. Mark my words.

Avatar image for cornbredx
cornbredx

7484

Forum Posts

2699

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 15

#30  Edited By cornbredx

Ya, we're taking all of the intelligence out of the "GFX" by stopping schooling at an early age and thrusting them into bad neighborhoods where they get hooked on drugs and start stealing form drug (corner) stores to get their next fix.

Damn "GFX" never got a break. This made it easier to keep it "dumbed down".

At least the graphics still look good. Unlike the dumb "GFX".

Avatar image for sterling
Sterling

4134

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

@karkarov: Explain to me how I was making fun of King's Field 4 exactly? I think you woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning.

Avatar image for chaser324
chaser324

9416

Forum Posts

14945

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 15

#32  Edited By chaser324  Moderator

The goal is to eventually decrease the graphical and audio quality to the point where they can just rebrand the game as Ultima VII Part 3.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e49e9175da37
deactivated-5e49e9175da37

10812

Forum Posts

782

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 14

We're dumbing down graphics now? How can you make graphics for stupid people?

Ha! Haha! Hahaha.

I just did the Ryan Creeper Cam laugh when I read this.

Avatar image for lukeweizer
Lukeweizer

3304

Forum Posts

24753

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#34  Edited By Lukeweizer

We're saying gfx instead of graphics now? Uuuughhhh...

Game looks fantastic. Quit whining.

Avatar image for tobako
Tobako

79

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Ya, we're taking all of the intelligence out of the "GFX" by stopping schooling at an early age and thrusting them into bad neighborhoods where they get hooked on drugs and start stealing form drug (corner) stores to get their next fix.

Damn "GFX" never got a break. This made it easier to keep it "dumbed down".

At least the graphics still look good. Unlike the dumb "GFX".

Hypocritical much? Unfortunately you had nothing intelligent to had to the topic, instead you simply try to make fun of me with some words out of your ass, did it make you feel smarter for an instant? Poor guy.

I'm now aware that the term "dumbed down" isn't really used to refer to "gfx" but hey! not every single person is a native speaker.

Regarding DkS2 the gameplay footage shown looks good and a couple shadows bugged or deliberately removed here and there doesn't concern me THAT much, I just hope it doesn't look much worse on the PS3 because in that case I'd rather wait and buy it later for PC.

Avatar image for cornbredx
cornbredx

7484

Forum Posts

2699

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 15

@tobako: relax. I was having a little fun with word play. You take things too seriously and take it as an insult to often from what I've seen of your other responses.

Avatar image for generic_username
generic_username

943

Forum Posts

1494

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 7

#37  Edited By generic_username

@tobako said:

@believer258: I said it was beside the point because I wasn't necessarily saying the gfx were bad, was just saying shadows looked disabled here and there, and while you tried to imply that I was stupid you called yourself and everyone else in your sentence.

Apologies tough to everyone else, the link I posted isn't working, here's vaati's gameplay video I talked about, beware of little spoilers http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tYOS12UCgg

You are being overly aggressive. I don't think I've ever seen @believer258 say anything that was meant to come off as an insult, especially not here. You're clearly very new here, but this community isn't looking to rip you apart. Stop acting like they're out to get you.

Avatar image for tobako
Tobako

79

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@generic_username: Perhaps I was too aggressive but considering I'm new I'm not supposed to know who to ignore or take seriously and cracking jokes at someone's expense still is a form of insult in my book.

Avatar image for thebigj_a
thebigJ_A

1022

Forum Posts

20

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#39  Edited By thebigJ_A

You're supposed to play it on the PC. Dark Souls at 1080 (downscaled from 2560, even) with advanced ambient occlusion and all the extras at solid 60fps...

Praise the sun.

Avatar image for evo
EVO

4028

Forum Posts

20

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#40  Edited By EVO

If it means better performance I don't mind a hit in graphics. Souls games have always been about art design anyway.

Avatar image for fattony12000
fattony12000

8491

Forum Posts

22398

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

I'm all about that stabe frame.

Avatar image for truthtellah
TruthTellah

9827

Forum Posts

423

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

@tobako: Cool down there, cowboy. Poking fun at one another is sort of what we do around here; it's not taking things more seriously than they need to be. And if you feel someone's actually being a jerk, just ignore them. No reason to escalate things further.

Anyway, it sounds like you're just concerned that they may be bumping down the graphical quality a bit for some reason(maybe framerate), but we'll see in the final version. Heck, I bet it will have a big day one patch to boot. Maybe they're not swinging for the fences graphically, but like Demon's Souls and Dark Souls before this, I imagine they're going to focus on style and gameplay over raw graphical quality. We probably won't really know for sure until it's in our living rooms.

Avatar image for bollard
Bollard

8298

Forum Posts

118

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 12

@mb: Is that meant to be a screenshot? Ive played that part of the game at a convention and it looked nothing like that, but that was a while ago. Looks more like concept art than actual game!

Avatar image for mike
mike

18011

Forum Posts

23067

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 6

Avatar image for generic_username
generic_username

943

Forum Posts

1494

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 7

@tobako: I actually don't really think that even the interpretation of "cracking a joke at your expense" is even accurate, but oh well. I'm not really seeing anything in this thread that reads that way. I think you're looking too hard for a fight. No one here is looking for a fight.

Anyways, sorry for derailing this. My intention was to let you know that nobody here is actually trying to treat you poorly, not to treat you poorly myself. Apologies.

Avatar image for bollard
Bollard

8298

Forum Posts

118

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 12

#46  Edited By Bollard

@mb: Ohhh I see! On my phone that image ended up looking like something drawn on parchment cause of the colour palette. That seems a little more similar to what I saw, but much more exaggerated. Looks good though.

Avatar image for tobako
Tobako

79

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47  Edited By Tobako

The game's most likely still going to be great anyway but just look at this IGN gameplay reveal from last year http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_JFDPCtXFY it's hard not to feel slightly disappointed, the game actually looked a lot more polished back then than in the BETA test, I hope they had some things turned off for performance or something and that the actual final version will look just as good as that shown a year ago.

Avatar image for sinusoidal
Sinusoidal

3608

Forum Posts

20

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I hope so, Blight Town nearly killed my PS3 judging from the sounds it was making and the frame rate chugging along in what was probably single digits. I'll take a little less graphical fidelity for a steady frame rate any day.

Avatar image for tobako
Tobako

79

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@sinusoidal: That's not what I meant but I also want steady framerate off course. I just think if properly optmized there's no reason for a game like DkS not looking great while having a steady framerate.

Avatar image for anjinm
AnjinM

157

Forum Posts

71

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#50  Edited By AnjinM

I like games for their art direction, not for how well they push the hardware. I thought Dark Souls looked amazing and I suspect Dark Souls II will look better.

Plus, have you seen the latest Vaati video with the torch sequence? I was stunned watching that.