Ey folks
Having just returned my Samsung C7000 due to disgusting input lag ranging up to about 90ms, i am now looking to buy a BRAVIA. Instead of lurking the shit out of stuck up AVforums etc i thought i'd ask some of the old community if they had any recommendations for a good LED Bravia with minimal input lag. Was looking at the KDL-46NX713. Experiences anyone? Shoot.
BRAVIA
My 120hz bravia has imput lag with all the dejuddering and 120 motionflow shit going on. It's reduced when you use lower settings or turn it off. My toshiba 120hz has no noticable input lag even with 120hz clearframe shit going on. However I like my bravia 120hz alot better. Also the bravia i've noticed doesn't really look at good at 720p, scaling is horrible. Blu ray looks out of this world though. I'm sorry that's all the experience I had with hdtvs, even my samsung 60hz hdtv had input lag and it was ghosting.I exhanged that hdtv for the toshiba. So really it's best to google a particular hdtv model to see if it has input lag. Never really owned an led, just lcd.
I thought this was a thread containing trivia about surfers who use the word "brah." You have greatly disappointed.
" @HitmanAgent47 said:That feature is literally only useful in sports, it makes movies look like handi-cam shot amateur porn, and games just look straight up weird."Hmm yeah. Most of the 120Hz/240Hz stuff just looks unnatural in games anyway. Mighty impressive in a couple such as Brotherhood. But apart from that, meh. Just a shame you need to turn it off for gaming when you just spent the extra cash on that feature alone... "My 120hz bravia has imput lag with all the dejuddering and 120 motionflow shit going on. It's reduced when you use lower settings or turn it off. My toshiba 120hz has no noticable input lag even with 120hz clearframe shit going on. However I like my bravia 120hz alot better. Also the bravia i've noticed doesn't really look at good at 720p, scaling is horrible. Blu ray looks out of this world though. I'm sorry that's all the experience I had with hdtvs, even my samsung 60hz hdtv had input lag and it was ghosting.I exhanged that hdtv for the toshiba. So really it's best to google a particular hdtv model to see if it has input lag. Never really owned an led, just lcd.
"
Like I said to the op, only the toshiba hdtv has no input lag in my experience so far. Yet blu ray is dull and grainy, however games looks decent. I use this for my computer display, so I do use it alot for gaming. I even use it with the 120hz clearframe setting on and it still has no input lag. Also like I said, it really doesn't look that sharp for blu ray at all, yet for games it's really sharp because there is some manual upscale feature called resolution plus which was intended to sharpen 480p and 720p features, which I also use for games to make it look even sharper at 1080p. It gives you a variety of sharpness you want to sharpen the disply. I wish there was a hdtv that can do everything well and has no lag, speaking on lcds only. I'm sure newer plasmas are very fast at 600Hz and has no input lag, however I myself don't like plasmas.
Then you times 24 X 10 = 240hz
600 divided 25 = 25 so in a way, they are using the correct amount of frames where it won't look out of place because old hdtvs like 60hz doesn't divide well into this number.
You can even divide 120hz into 30 frame sports stuff, which is = 4
you can divide 240hz into 30 frames 8
you can divide 600 divided by 30 is 24.
So the conclusion is even if you stack framerates, you won't have a few frames out of place and it should render correctly. I'm also not sure about the type of interpolation plama uses, i'm sure it's slightly different than 120hz hdtvs and they might just replay the same frames a few times inbetween frames. I don't own a plasma hdtv so I didn't research it extensively, it might not even look like a soap opera, yet it's probally blur free. Just do the math, the frames will not have any extra odd frames making the picture look funny, like 24hz film to 60hz hdtv, it doesn't divide into that number well.
that might not make alot of sense, however 120hz they add one extra inbetween frame to make 120 per second. 600hz, i'm sure they don't put the exact middle inbetween from, rather they just repeat a frame a few more times inbetween from one from to another, to make 600hz. That's what I think, I could be wrong, I don't own a plasma, however I think that's how they are doing it. It's a bit different than 120hz hdtvs where they create a new frame inbetween two frames sort of like animation inbetween frames.
I was thinking, what about getting a panasonic vierra plasma hdtv? Maybe that's what your looking for, which probally has no input lag. Might have some image retension, however it will go away.
Can anyone attest to a substantial difference between LCD and LED-LCD? I'm currently in a very similar situation to the OP, except I'm not looking at 3D stuff at all. The price difference between LCD and LED-LCD for the 46" tvs is $400, so I would love to know that it would pay off. I know that the idea is better contrast and deeper blacks in the LED tvs, and they say the power consumption is cut in half, but does anyone have any real experience with this? Anyone's life changed by the upgrade to LED?
I've been looking at the KDL40EX500 personally. I really like it, and it's pretty affordable (IMO), but I'm sure something else will catch my eye before I actually get a new one in a month or so.
"I'm not sure what the Plasma tv's are doing now a days but I know when I was buying my LCD about 4 years ago everyone was saying Plasma isn't good for video games just because of screen burn in. It was designed more for just playing movie, I don't know if they have changed it now a days but at this point I would do a little research on screen burn in if I was you.I was thinking, what about getting a panasonic vierra plasma hdtv? Maybe that's what your looking for, which probally has no input lag. Might have some image retension, however it will go away.
"
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment