So I just finished Chains of Olympus and I played the collection awhile ago so I'm trying to decide what to play next? Should I continue playing the games in order of their release or will playing Ghost of Sparta first add something more to God of War 3?
God of War 3 or Ghost of Sparta?
I haven't played Ghost of Sparta, but I've heard that playing that game gives you a better understanding of some of the relationships between Kratos and other characters in God of War 3. It probably doesn't really matter, but I would suggest playing Ghost of Sparta first.
GOS then 3. 3 amps everything up so playing a PS3 game then a psp game would be weird.
" III is the worst game in the series (with the possible exception of the first God of War, which is the only I haven't played). Ghost of Sparta is superior in pretty much every way. Except graphics, obviously. "I actually felt the complete opposite: GoW1 was pretty epic but because I played GoW2 so much later it didn't pack much of a punch for me. On the other hand I thought GoW3 was incredible. It packed a vicious punch and was a great way to end Kratos' story.
" @Icemael said:Visually it was amazing, and the puzzles were the best in the series (though that isn't saying much, lol), but I felt that everything else was just complete shit. Story, boss battles, weaponry, level design, even camerawork -- it was just a massive, massive disappointment." III is the worst game in the series (with the possible exception of the first God of War, which is the only I haven't played). Ghost of Sparta is superior in pretty much every way. Except graphics, obviously. "I actually felt the complete opposite: GoW1 was pretty epic but because I played GoW2 so much later it didn't pack much of a punch for me. On the other hand I thought GoW3 was incredible. It packed a vicious punch and was a great way to end Kratos' story. "
I think I know why it was such a mess, too. A couple of weeks after I had finished it, I read that the previous games' directors had left the studio, and that the art director had been put in charge of the entire game. That's exactly what it felt like: a game made by someone who's great at making stuff look cool, but knows fuck-all about game design.
" @RsistncE said:I'd say that I disagree. The only bad part for me was the story and it was bad in a good way." @Icemael said:Visually it was amazing, and the puzzles were the best in the series (though that isn't saying much, lol), but I felt that everything else was just complete shit. Story, boss battles, weaponry, level design, even camerawork -- it was just a massive, massive disappointment." III is the worst game in the series (with the possible exception of the first God of War, which is the only I haven't played). Ghost of Sparta is superior in pretty much every way. Except graphics, obviously. "I actually felt the complete opposite: GoW1 was pretty epic but because I played GoW2 so much later it didn't pack much of a punch for me. On the other hand I thought GoW3 was incredible. It packed a vicious punch and was a great way to end Kratos' story. "
I think I know why it was such a mess, too. A couple of weeks after I had finished it, I read that the previous games' directors had left the studio, and that the art director had been put in charge of the entire game. That's exactly what it felt like: a game made by someone who's great at making stuff look cool, but knows fuck-all about game design. "
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment