I just gone done watching their video from gamescom and just noticed that the previous Infamous games took place in fictional cities. For some reason it just strikes me as odd and makes me wonder if they will even refer to the fake cities in the previous games as straight up New York and New Orleans. Anyone else have thoughts on this?
Weird thing I just now noticed about Infamous: Second Son
It doesn't strike me as that odd, since Grand Theft Auto and Saints Row both acknowledge that other, real-world cities exist. So there's a precedent for that sort of thing.
I imagine if the events of Infamous or Infamous 2 are important to this game's story, they'll be referred to by their in-game names. Otherwise, maybe not?
Also, while we're here, a spoilery question: Since both conduits and regular humans exist side-by-side in this game, does that imply that Cole chose the "bad" ending in Infamous 2?
I could have sworn that previous Infamous games called states by their real names and referenced Washington at least. It continues in the tradition of fictional cities being used to create bubbles for characters to exist in an otherwise realistic world (eg. Gotham). Considering Infamous has always been highly inspired by comic books, I'm fine with it and don't think it'll break immersion.
It doesn't strike me as that odd, since Grand Theft Auto and Saints Row both acknowledge that other, real-world cities exist. So there's a precedent for that sort of thing.
I imagine if the events of Infamous or Infamous 2 are important to this game's story, they'll be referred to by their in-game names. Otherwise, maybe not?
Also, while we're here, a spoilery question: Since both conduits and regular humans exist side-by-side in this game, does that imply that Cole chose the "bad" ending in Infamous 2?
I heard somewhere that they chose that ending due to there being more unlocked trophies for that than the other ending.
Edit: It was the good ending in which Cole sacrifices himself as stated here.
It doesn't strike me as that odd, since Grand Theft Auto and Saints Row both acknowledge that other, real-world cities exist. So there's a precedent for that sort of thing.
I imagine if the events of Infamous or Infamous 2 are important to this game's story, they'll be referred to by their in-game names. Otherwise, maybe not?
Also, while we're here, a spoilery question: Since both conduits and regular humans exist side-by-side in this game, does that imply that Cole chose the "bad" ending in Infamous 2?
I heard somewhere that they chose that ending due to there being more unlocked trophies for that than the other ending.
Ah, cool, cool. That makes sense in its way.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment