The GTA V Reviews Compilation & Discussion Thread

Avatar image for bocam
Bocam

4099

Forum Posts

3868

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

@darji said:

@bocam said:

@rowr: Franklin's aunt seems out of place

@milkman: That's what I was trying to point out. But on the other hand the men are just as bad

How is she out of place? It is a perfect parody of feminists and Rockstar always has actual topics in their characters.

Maybe out of place is the wrong way to put it. Badly written may be better. Her chanting "Vulva, vulva, vulva" just seemed dumb

Avatar image for iamnotbatman
IAmNotBatman

704

Forum Posts

43

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Wow, I didn't think that so many people would react as they have on GS... probably mostly babbling teenagers but still.

Avatar image for mariachimacabre
MariachiMacabre

7097

Forum Posts

106

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#153  Edited By MariachiMacabre

@bocam said:

@darji said:

@bocam said:

@rowr: Franklin's aunt seems out of place

@milkman: That's what I was trying to point out. But on the other hand the men are just as bad

How is she out of place? It is a perfect parody of feminists and Rockstar always has actual topics in their characters.

Maybe out of place is the wrong way to put it. Badly written may be better. Her chanting "Vulva, vulva, vulva" just seemed dumb

I think Darji likes it because it parodies a thing he so vehemently despises. If she was flipped and was parodying a men's rights activist, he'd be calling Rockstar a part of the "PC MOB" or some nonsense. I don't care either way. The sexism debate needs to stop being brought into every topic on this site.

Avatar image for jasonr86
JasonR86

10468

Forum Posts

449

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

#154  Edited By JasonR86

I just read the Gamespot review. I'll have to play it myself to see if those things bother me or not. On the one hand, they are emulating the real world where sexism is very real so not having it there would be odd. These games are satirical and so everything, including sexism, should be fair game. But if they glorify sexism and don't have any recourse, either for those actions or for those characters, then I might have a problem with it. But at the sane time if they glorify crime with no recourse I'd have a problem with that too.

Avatar image for milkman
Milkman

19372

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

#155  Edited By Milkman

@rowr: Again, she gave the game a 9/10. You make it sound like she hated it. If her perspective isn't interesting to you, that's fine but her review really isn't much of a outlier from every other review published today. The core of the review is still "this game is really fucking good."

Avatar image for rowr
Rowr

5861

Forum Posts

249

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

@darji said:

@drdarkstryfe said:

The game is very misogynistic, but it is also a Dan Houser joint. You know what you are going to get when the man is the lead writer.

As for the "bad things just because" angle, I really have not seen that in the time I put into the title so far. Franklin has a very clear set of motivations that drive what he is doing. Michael hits a pretty important moment early that sets him on his path. Lester is actually pretty goal driven for the wild card he is.

This game is also very racist. So what? GTA characters are always totally extreme and GTAV is no exception. That goes for male as for female characters. I have atlaeast seen the same amount of male characters so far someone could get offended by especially the black ones.

I'm guessing you mean the characters are racist?

There's a difference between the characters being racist and the game being racist.

Avatar image for crembaw
Crembaw

894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@darji said:

@bocam said:

@rowr: Franklin's aunt seems out of place

@milkman: That's what I was trying to point out. But on the other hand the men are just as bad

How is she out of place? It is a perfect parody of feminists and Rockstar always has actual topics in their characters.

You are a massive tool.

Avatar image for kishinfoulux
kishinfoulux

3328

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Oh hey look...the game got really high marks...and people thought I was crazy for thinking that for some reason, as if it weren't a given. Go figure.

Avatar image for crembaw
Crembaw

894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@darji said:

@bocam said:

@rowr: Franklin's aunt seems out of place

@milkman: That's what I was trying to point out. But on the other hand the men are just as bad

How is she out of place? It is a perfect parody of feminists and Rockstar always has actual topics in their characters.

You are a massive tool.

Avatar image for sergio
Sergio

3663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

@jking47 said:

@excast: If one of the steak reviewers was a woman, or transgender, would you say they should not be reviewing steak because it has always been a food associated with masculinity? If the steak house is called "Big Daves Steakhouse for DUDEZ ONLY!" and is covered with pictures of half naked ladies, and the female/transgender reviewer gives the place a 9/10 and says "Amazing steak, but the place is profoundly misogynistic", would you say they shouldn't be reviewing it because its obviously for men only?

Sounds like that steakhouse loves women.

Avatar image for deactivated-61665c8292280
deactivated-61665c8292280

7702

Forum Posts

2136

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

@punkxblaze: Logged in after reading this post just for the sole purpose of telling you I really appreciated reading it.

It might not be the be-all, end-all opinion on the subject. Hell, you'll be lucky to have most in this thread agree with you on each tenet. But at least there's a little bit of even-handed reason still around.

Avatar image for blu3v3nom07
Blu3V3nom07

4518

Forum Posts

130

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#162  Edited By Blu3V3nom07

The Verge

No Score

"A wild ride through a crazy world"

"I wanted to see what would happen to Trevor, Michael, and Franklin more than I wanted to try jumping a motorcycle onto a moving train — and I really wanted to trying landing that jump."

Avatar image for dr_mantas
dr_mantas

2557

Forum Posts

92

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

#163  Edited By dr_mantas

I don't give a damn about scores. For any game. So griping on that seems silly.

I'm just glad I finally won the round of "Social Justice issue of the day for Game Critics" bingo.

I wonder if it would be possible to somehow gather statistics about what proportion of people buying GTA are female. Would be interesting to know.

And it's also interesting how similar types of people that praise creative control go apeshit when they don't agree with someone's creation.

Avatar image for darji
Darji

5412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@rowr said:

@darji said:

@drdarkstryfe said:

The game is very misogynistic, but it is also a Dan Houser joint. You know what you are going to get when the man is the lead writer.

As for the "bad things just because" angle, I really have not seen that in the time I put into the title so far. Franklin has a very clear set of motivations that drive what he is doing. Michael hits a pretty important moment early that sets him on his path. Lester is actually pretty goal driven for the wild card he is.

This game is also very racist. So what? GTA characters are always totally extreme and GTAV is no exception. That goes for male as for female characters. I have atlaeast seen the same amount of male characters so far someone could get offended by especially the black ones.

I'm guessing you mean the characters are racist?

There's a difference between the characters being racist and the game being racist.

No the generalization of these characters are very racist. Not the protagonists but a lot of side characters. They are stereotypical and and extreme in that and That is why his aunt also fits perfectly into all this. You have these stereotypical politician you have these feminists, you have these black people. Michael's family are a bunch of assholes, There are tons of rednecks and so on. So why is a parody of a feminist out of place?

Avatar image for viking_funeral
viking_funeral

2881

Forum Posts

57

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 5

Ctrl + F: 31 hits for misogny over 160 posts.

A word meaning an outright hatred of women.

Male chauvinism might be a better term to use. But we're going to get more of a reaction by being extremist in both opinion and exaggeration, right? It's getting to the point where I can barely go online to discuss video games, because everyone is too busy arguing with the mentality of school children.

Avatar image for crembaw
Crembaw

894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166  Edited By Crembaw


And it's also interesting how similar types of people that praise creative control go apeshit when they don't agree with someone's creation.

She didn't go apeshit. She critiqued it as is her right and still loved the game even though it slightly detracted from her experience.

Avatar image for crembaw
Crembaw

894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0


And it's also interesting how similar types of people that praise creative control go apeshit when they don't agree with someone's creation.

She didn't go apeshit. She critiqued it as is her right and still loved the game even though it slightly detracted from her experience.

Avatar image for kishinfoulux
kishinfoulux

3328

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Sorry guys. Games aren't allowed to have male leads anymore. If they do? Sexist. If a woman is kidnapped? Sexist. If a woman shows a hint of skin? Sexist. Fuck off.

Avatar image for rowr
Rowr

5861

Forum Posts

249

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

@darji said:

@rowr said:

@darji said:

@drdarkstryfe said:

The game is very misogynistic, but it is also a Dan Houser joint. You know what you are going to get when the man is the lead writer.

As for the "bad things just because" angle, I really have not seen that in the time I put into the title so far. Franklin has a very clear set of motivations that drive what he is doing. Michael hits a pretty important moment early that sets him on his path. Lester is actually pretty goal driven for the wild card he is.

This game is also very racist. So what? GTA characters are always totally extreme and GTAV is no exception. That goes for male as for female characters. I have atlaeast seen the same amount of male characters so far someone could get offended by especially the black ones.

I'm guessing you mean the characters are racist?

There's a difference between the characters being racist and the game being racist.

No the generalization of these characters are very racist. Not the protagonists but a lot of side characters. They are stereotypical and and extreme in that and That is why his aunt also fits perfectly into all this. You have these stereotypical politician you have these feminists, you have these black people. Michael's family are a bunch of assholes, There are tons of rednecks and so on. So why is a parody of a feminist out of place?

Goddamit.

Americans really need to be taught in school or something how racism works. All this misogny stuff is basically the same misinterpretation.

Avatar image for crembaw
Crembaw

894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Sorry guys. Games aren't allowed to have male leads anymore. If they do? Sexist. If a woman is kidnapped? Sexist. If a woman shows a hint of skin? Sexist. Fuck off.

Isn't school in session right now? Why are you here?

Avatar image for winternet
Winternet

8454

Forum Posts

2255

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

@milkman said:

@winternet said:

@milkman said:
@gaminghooligan said:

"Don't buy this game about criminals if you think criminals are criminals." -The Escapist

If a character is doing shitty things just for the sake of doing shitty things, then that's a poorly written character.

What happened to the "some men just want to watch the world burn"?

The site just ate my post...great. What I was GOING to say was...

Those "men who just want to watch the world burn" are typically the antagonist in the story and those kind of characters can certainly be effective in their own right but as a protagonist, I can see how someone who just a piece of shit for no reason other than being a piece of shit could create a disconnect and in turn make the story less interesting.

Walter White does terrible things in Breaking Bad but they are all justified within his character, even if you may not necessarily agree with those justifications. To him, as a character, what he's doing is for some sort of greater good. If Walt just ran around shooting people in the head because it was fun, he would a pretty bad character, I think.

It depends on how you structure it and how things are played out. Funny Games isn't a worse movie because the two guys are evil and don't have an ulterior motive besides being evil. And I, as a viewer, am definitely not connecting with them, but still, the quality of the movie doesn't decreased based on that.

Avatar image for milkman
Milkman

19372

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

#172  Edited By Milkman

Sorry guys. Games aren't allowed to have male leads anymore. If they do? Sexist. If a woman is kidnapped? Sexist. If a woman shows a hint of skin? Sexist. Fuck off.

Who are you even talking to?

Avatar image for darji
Darji

5412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@rowr said:

@darji said:

@rowr said:

@darji said:

@drdarkstryfe said:

The game is very misogynistic, but it is also a Dan Houser joint. You know what you are going to get when the man is the lead writer.

As for the "bad things just because" angle, I really have not seen that in the time I put into the title so far. Franklin has a very clear set of motivations that drive what he is doing. Michael hits a pretty important moment early that sets him on his path. Lester is actually pretty goal driven for the wild card he is.

This game is also very racist. So what? GTA characters are always totally extreme and GTAV is no exception. That goes for male as for female characters. I have atlaeast seen the same amount of male characters so far someone could get offended by especially the black ones.

I'm guessing you mean the characters are racist?

There's a difference between the characters being racist and the game being racist.

No the generalization of these characters are very racist. Not the protagonists but a lot of side characters. They are stereotypical and and extreme in that and That is why his aunt also fits perfectly into all this. You have these stereotypical politician you have these feminists, you have these black people. Michael's family are a bunch of assholes, There are tons of rednecks and so on. So why is a parody of a feminist out of place?

Goddamit.

Americans really need to be taught in school or something how racism works. All this misogny stuff is basically the same misinterpretation.

First of all I am not american. Secondly I know how this works and I totally agree with you but if people think this is misogynistic they also have to call this game racist because of these characters. That is the whole point here....

Avatar image for justin258
Justin258

16684

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 8

I watched Petit's review earlier. She spent about ten seconds on misogyny and 8 minutes on praise, and the misogyny complaint doesn't even look unjustified.

Oh well. I'm ready to terrorize fake LA!

Avatar image for mariachimacabre
MariachiMacabre

7097

Forum Posts

106

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#175  Edited By MariachiMacabre

Sorry guys. Games aren't allowed to have male leads anymore. If they do? Sexist. If a woman is kidnapped? Sexist. If a woman shows a hint of skin? Sexist. Fuck off.

Good thing all those points were brought up in her review or you'd look really foolish right about now. Wait, she didn't mention any of that. And she gave it a 9 out of 10. Christ. People are acting like she gave it a 1 and said "GTA MUST BURN FOR IT'S SINS!"

Avatar image for clonedzero
Clonedzero

4206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Holy shit. Do we really need this ridiculous sexism discussion for EVERYTHING?

Avatar image for ghostiet
Ghostiet

5832

Forum Posts

160

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

@hailinel said:

@winternet: Sure you can. If the personalities of the protagonists lessen your enjoyment of the game, they're making the game worse.

Is "Goodfellas" a bad movie because it's about despicable people, including a sociopath, an opportunistic snitch and a violent man with anger issues and a Napoleon complex, none of whom are portrayed as appealing in a different way than "they're gangsters, and I guess Henry Hill is less psychotic"?

Avatar image for gaminghooligan
gaminghooligan

1831

Forum Posts

30

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 1

@milkman: I wasn't trying to knock the Escapist review that hard, I actually think there are some good points being made in it. I just thought lines like the opener: In GTA V, you play as a terrible person. Are kind of funny. I mean the game is called Grand Theft Auto. I think it's important for anti-hero or bad guy protagonists to be well written, but seeing as I haven't played it yet I can't make a judgment call on the writing yet.

Avatar image for cloudnineboya
cloudnineboya

990

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Giantbomb 5 outa 5. Now i know where jeff be getting his dough.

Avatar image for hailinel
Hailinel

25785

Forum Posts

219681

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 28

@ghostiet: Does Goodfellas suffer in your mind because of the way the characters are portrayed? I enjoy the movie, but that doesn't mean I can't criticize GTAV for having an unlikable cast if I feel the game suffers because of that.

Avatar image for laserbolts
laserbolts

5506

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Might check out Jeff's review just for the hell of it but I honestly don't care about those other sites and what they are scoring it. I already made my mind up when it was announced. I'm getting this game.

Avatar image for fattony12000
fattony12000

8491

Forum Posts

22398

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Avatar image for milkman
Milkman

19372

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

Best review I've read so far.

Avatar image for humanity
Humanity

21858

Forum Posts

5738

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 16

#185  Edited By Humanity

@milkman: I simply take great issue with using the word "misogynistic" because as I stated before thats a very powerful term. You don't just throw that around willy nilly. I doubt the Hausers are misogynists and likewise don't think their story has misogynistic qualities to it - unless there are plenty of scenes where men dominate over women, and intend cruelty and harm towards them for no reason other than their passionate hatred towards them. Excluding women from a story is not misogynistic and really it doesn't even always have to be sexist either. It would be nice if people paid to write for a living were a little more conscientious of what they put out there considering a lot of younger people tend to read their work.

Avatar image for jimmyfenix
jimmyfenix

3941

Forum Posts

20

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for ramone
Ramone

3210

Forum Posts

364

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

Is anyone else a little bit disappointed in Carolyn? If she was deeply and profoundly offended by the game's attitude towards women why is the game still getting a 9? She made a stand, and I applaud her for it, but she didn't go all the way. I still think that even amongst some of the most progressive and thick skinned reviewers there is a belief that certain franchises deserve a certain base score.

Disclaimer: I've pre-ordered GTA and I'm really excited to play it.

Avatar image for milkman
Milkman

19372

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

#190  Edited By Milkman

@humanity: I haven't read all the reviews but the "there isn't a female protagonist" doesn't seem like a talking point in a lot of the reviews. The complaints seem to be about the female characters that are actually in the game. Whether it's "misogynist" or "sexist" or whatever is really just semantics. I don't think anyone is trying to say that the people who make GTA are women haters or anything. Just that maybe the portrayal of women isn't very good. You might be right that misogynist is a strong word but I think the criticisms are still valid.

Avatar image for slashdance
SlashDance

1867

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Oh the drama!

Loading Video...

Avatar image for davidwitten22
davidwitten22

1712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Ctrl + F: 31 hits for misogny over 160 posts.

A word meaning an outright hatred of women.

Male chauvinism might be a better term to use. But we're going to get more of a reaction by being extremist in both opinion and exaggeration, right? It's getting to the point where I can barely go online to discuss video games, because everyone is too busy arguing with the mentality of school children.

Dear god stop arguing semantics. Your definition is different than the definition I could pull from wikipedia, or from a different online dictionary / encyclopedia. We all know what misogny means, but instead of actually talking about the issue you are complaining about a mostly insignificant word choice. "It's getting to the point where I can barely go online to discuss video games, because everyone is too busy arguing about word choice."

This thread is embarrassing. Two reviewers briefly mentioned that there are some weird sexist things in the game, but the game is still totally great. You people are acting like the reviewer smacked you in the face and tied you up and read you a feminist newsletter against your will.

Avatar image for sergio
Sergio

3663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

#193  Edited By Sergio

@kishinfoulux said:

Sorry guys. Games aren't allowed to have male leads anymore. If they do? Sexist. If a woman is kidnapped? Sexist. If a woman shows a hint of skin? Sexist. Fuck off.

Good thing all those points were brought up in her review or you'd look really foolish right about now. Wait, she didn't mention any of that. And she gave it a 9 out of 10. Christ. People are acting like she gave it a 1 and said "GTA MUST BURN FOR IT'S SINS!"

Just want to point out that this thread isn't specifically about one particular review, and she isn't the only one who has brought up the possibility of sexism and misogyny in GTA V in their review. That post you quote doesn't even seem to be about any particular review, but the general trend in game journalism.

Avatar image for sergio
Sergio

3663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

#194  Edited By Sergio

@kishinfoulux said:

Sorry guys. Games aren't allowed to have male leads anymore. If they do? Sexist. If a woman is kidnapped? Sexist. If a woman shows a hint of skin? Sexist. Fuck off.

Good thing all those points were brought up in her review or you'd look really foolish right about now. Wait, she didn't mention any of that. And she gave it a 9 out of 10. Christ. People are acting like she gave it a 1 and said "GTA MUST BURN FOR IT'S SINS!"

Just want to point out that this thread isn't specifically about one particular review, and she isn't the only one who has brought up the possibility of sexism and misogyny in GTA V in their review. That post you quote doesn't even seem to be about any particular review, but the general trend in game journalism.

Avatar image for sdharrison
sdharrison

519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@viking_funeral said:

Ctrl + F: 31 hits for misogny over 160 posts.

A word meaning an outright hatred of women.

Male chauvinism might be a better term to use. But we're going to get more of a reaction by being extremist in both opinion and exaggeration, right? It's getting to the point where I can barely go online to discuss video games, because everyone is too busy arguing with the mentality of school children.

Dear god stop arguing semantics. Your definition is different than the definition I could pull from wikipedia, or from a different online dictionary / encyclopedia. We all know what misogny means, but instead of actually talking about the issue you are complaining about a mostly insignificant word choice. "It's getting to the point where I can barely go online to discuss video games, because everyone is too busy arguing about word choice."

This thread is embarrassing. Two reviewers briefly mentioned that there are some weird sexist things in the game, but the game is still totally great. You people are acting like the reviewer smacked you in the face and tied you up and read you a feminist newsletter against your will.

Dude you're not supposed to talk about things you think about stuff.

Avatar image for shadowconqueror
ShadowConqueror

3413

Forum Posts

1275

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

#196  Edited By ShadowConqueror

Sessler said that Trevor could be one of the best characters ever written, in any medium. Strong words, but I certainly look forward to finding out for myself.

Avatar image for mariachimacabre
MariachiMacabre

7097

Forum Posts

106

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

@sergio said:

@mariachimacabre said:

@kishinfoulux said:

Sorry guys. Games aren't allowed to have male leads anymore. If they do? Sexist. If a woman is kidnapped? Sexist. If a woman shows a hint of skin? Sexist. Fuck off.

Good thing all those points were brought up in her review or you'd look really foolish right about now. Wait, she didn't mention any of that. And she gave it a 9 out of 10. Christ. People are acting like she gave it a 1 and said "GTA MUST BURN FOR IT'S SINS!"

Just want to point out that this thread isn't specifically about one particular review, and she isn't the only one who has brought up the possibility of sexism and misogyny in GTA V in their review. That post you quote doesn't even seem to be about any particular review, but the general trend in game journalism.

But she is overwhelmingly the one being talked about/attacked the most. Including in this thread.

Avatar image for vaiz
vaiz

3188

Forum Posts

28

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 4

#198  Edited By vaiz

@ramone: Just to clarify, let me make sure I understand the point you're making; you are saying that she should have docked the game even further for the misogyny aspect, to make a point, but didn't because it's expected that a GTA game will have a certain high base score because it's GTA?

If so, I'm not sure I agree. As I mentioned before, it's absolutely her prerogative to feel offended or uncomfortable about the game's content in that sense, but docking it down to, let's say, a seven, would be incredibly misleading. A lot of people simply see a numbered score, and don't actually read the context of the review to go with it. When I see a game that has a 7/10 (Or, to simplify it, let's say a 3.5/5), I assume there is something mechanically wrong with the game, that it is broken in some way and the gameplay itself is hindered by the flaws. This is not the case-- I think her docking any more than one point from the game for this reason would have been disingenuous in a sense, but that gets in to a whole other conversation as to how games are scored and on what criteria they should be scored on, between objective mechanical factors and subjective opinions on content, and this is not the place for that.

If I misunderstood your meaning, though, I apologize for the long winded response, and I'd be interested to hear you elaborate.

@historyinrust: I appreciate the sentiment. It bugs me how knee-jerk the internet tends to be as a whole, and I fall in to the same habits more often than I'd like to admit, but I think in a situation like this where so much abuse is being heaped on the reviewer, it's important that people try to get their opinions out without turning it in to a tirade of FEMINAZI LOL TRANNY FREAK like so many people seem to be doing.

By the way, guys, not to get back on topic or anything, but based on these reviews I am super excited to play this fucking game. Even better, it's coming out three days before my birthday SO GUESS WHAT I'M GETTIN' FOR A BIRTHDAY PRESENT.

Avatar image for musubi
musubi

17524

Forum Posts

5650

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 17

@viking_funeral said:

Ctrl + F: 31 hits for misogny over 160 posts.

A word meaning an outright hatred of women.

Male chauvinism might be a better term to use. But we're going to get more of a reaction by being extremist in both opinion and exaggeration, right? It's getting to the point where I can barely go online to discuss video games, because everyone is too busy arguing with the mentality of school children.

Dear god stop arguing semantics. Your definition is different than the definition I could pull from wikipedia, or from a different online dictionary / encyclopedia. We all know what misogny means, but instead of actually talking about the issue you are complaining about a mostly insignificant word choice. "It's getting to the point where I can barely go online to discuss video games, because everyone is too busy arguing about word choice."

This thread is embarrassing. Two reviewers briefly mentioned that there are some weird sexist things in the game, but the game is still totally great. You people are acting like the reviewer smacked you in the face and tied you up and read you a feminist newsletter against your will.

Er....word choice is VERY important when trying to get a point a cross. A single word can completely change the context,meaning and tone of a sentence. Id hardly say complaining about people frivolously flinging about the word "misogyny" is semantics.

Avatar image for ramone
Ramone

3210

Forum Posts

364

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

@punkxblaze: My point was more that I don't believe a game which offends someone's sensibilities and beliefs like that can still get such a high score.