Why are Science and Math being pushed right now as so important? As an English Major and History buff, this really puts me off. Being creative is just as important. I felt the same way in the 80's and 90's when there was a huge push by Republican Presidents to promote Literacy. I think the education push shouldn't have an emphasis put on select subjects, and I believe the problem in America lies with both parties and not just one agenda seeing as they both have missed the boat on the topic for the last 20+ years.
Science and Math.
It's cuz we're falling way behind other countries in those areas, according to a whole bunch of statistics. Creativity is important, yes, but it won't save us from the Chinese Army and their Power Armor.
" @tdk08 said:Nope. Tell me the last time you've used anything you learned in a history class in real life. (Jeopardy doesn't count)" Well, I just have to say that history has no place in this argument if that's what you're implying. You do not need it nearly as much (not at all, I say) as the others. "Nah, we've nothing to learn from our past, have we? "
Our education system is not quite as well rounded as other nations' (and not quite as good overall). No country wants to be left behind while others churn out scientists and mathematicians that pave the way to the future. Creativity is definitely important and not something to just throw aside, but, at the same time, it is worth it to have a good balance.
" Why are Science and Math being pushed right now as so important? As an English Major and History buff, this really puts me off. Being creative is just as important.
If you don't think math and science are creative, then you haven't studied math and science at the graduate level. Also, how can *creativity* be *taught*?
It's been a very long time since I've sat in a history class! But let's both learn something from history right now:" @diz said:
" @tdk08 said:Nope. Tell me the last time you've used anything you learned in a history class in real life. (Jeopardy doesn't count) "" Well, I just have to say that history has no place in this argument if that's what you're implying. You do not need it nearly as much (not at all, I say) as the others. "Nah, we've nothing to learn from our past, have we? "
Thucydides once said; "History is Philosophy teaching by examples".
History should be a top priority in our schools. After all, who are we if we don't know our history?
American's especially should be well educated in the Constitution, and the nation's founding. Our nation is unique in the sense that so much responsibility is given to each individual in this country.
I would dispute that 'being creative' is as important as 'being useful'. The problems we face are going to be solved by scientists and mathematicians, not by somebody painting a nice picture or talking to me about my feelings or whatever.
Why are they pushing math and science? Because too many kids are taking almost worthless degrees (made worthless by virtue of the fact that so many are taking them, rather than the subject itself) just because they think they will be easy, and are really only taking them in the first place so they can live it up at University for a few years (subsidised by the tax payer of course).
You, personally, may not ever apply history to life but that doesn't really say anything about the study itself. There are plenty of fields that apply history to the modern day. Be it in economic theory, foreign diplomacy, or projecting societal trends, we can trace events back to figure out what happened where and when and what effect it had on events that are occuring in the modern day. Using the past as an example, we can try to resolve issues before they become major. Of course, simply saying that those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it isn't necessarily true because oftentimes those who do know the past can manipulate it to meet an agenda as well. History can be a powerful tool." @diz said:
Nope. Tell me the last time you've used anything you learned in a history class in real life. (Jeopardy doesn't count) "" @tdk08 said:
" Well, I just have to say that history has no place in this argument if that's what you're implying. You do not need it nearly as much (not at all, I say) as the others. "Nah, we've nothing to learn from our past, have we? "
Though, I'm more of a bio/chem guy myself.
" History should be a top priority in our schools. After all, who are we if we don't know our history? American's especially should be well educated in the Constitution, and the nation's founding. Our nation is unique in the sense that so much responsibility is given to each individual in this country. "The problem with history is its subjectivity. I'd also have thought America should pursue a more international focus in what is now a global society.
Technological innovation and creative expression are both defining characteristics of humans, so are both equally important.
Not at the graduate level. Before you can contribute to the field, you have to learn the fundamentals, though." In science aren't you learning from those who come before us. Thus we are simply "standing on the shoulders of giants" liek tesla :D "
Science and math are important in just about every aspect of your life, whether you acknowledge it or not. And the purpose of learning a subject isn't just to memorize facts about it; you also learn critical thinking skills, get exposed to things you would not have otherwise, and maybe even apply these skills and ideas into areas you are more interested in personally.
The way I look at it every subject is a derivative of science because English is the study of the language and content, namely literature, of a culture (the world or a specific nation) and math is a tool developed by people in order to calculate the world around them. History is a collection of the past as formulated and verified by evidence and evidence based thinking. Hell "social studies" is a misnomer because it's just science but studying human products such as economy, psychology, sociology etc. So one way or another you can look at something in a scientific manner so pushing science is never a bad thing in my eyes. The only problem I have is the way we have compartmentalized subjects and wholly separate and distinct from others.
If you took your history, you would know that America has had the motivation to push Math and Science before (i.e. The Cold War) and this time it's for the same reason: international competition. Being industrialized nations, our virility in the international field in terms of economy and such is directly related to our scientists and engineers. As a result schools around the nation have a seeming pressure put on them to emphasize Math and Science in order to produce more engineers and such to compete with countries like India and China.
I've always felt that the statistics behind American test scores was biased and really not the reason you push any one subject. Test scores is an issue of the states scrambling to plug up this hole or that in their system based on the score and what they can get from the government as a result of said score.
I believe all forms of education are necessary its just that math and science are dubbed the more "important" subjects. Average people will most likely use these two subjects the most, but i dont think its exactly a smart decision, it looks so bad when someone can't point out where Great Britain is on a map or when some doesn't know how to pronounce Czechoslovakia in social studies.
Maybe it's just that a lot of kids these days aren't interested. I'm going to a Math Science Center around here, so I could agree that it isn't really pushed in normal school.
All great points. I guess I just don't trust the reasons behind why it's being pushed. I see the gov't wanting math and sciences at the forefront not for good, but for control purposes. I just don't see the American gov't as benevolent I guess. There is always an ulterior agenda when it comes to who runs this country. That is why I think that balance is necessary, because it is usually the journalists and people who write historical books that remind us of how we need to keep our leaders in check in this country. I think that math and science are just as important, but whistle blowers tend to be more zealous and cut of a creative cloth more often than not.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment