You are using what people complain about when it comes to broadcast television standards--that you can show people being shot, but you can't show bare breasts--and trying to apply that to video games. The important double standard here isn't sex vs. violence, it's video games vs. other media.1. I think most of the people here complaining about selling game to minors being illegal are in fact minors and need to stfu, play mario and wait your turn. The others are just bored. 2. I saw his skit. There was nothing wrong with that skit and he wasn't hating on video games. The joke was it is ok for my 5yr to disembowel someone and teabag them in a game but GOD FORBID he ever sees a breast or cameltoe. It's retardo logic and you all know it.
For this to be a true sex vs. violence double standard regarding VIDEO GAMES, you wouldn't say "it's okay for my kid to disembowel someone in a video game, but God forbid that they see bare breasts in that video game." You wouldn't say that, because it's a non-issue, because they CAN see bare breasts in a video game. Instead, you'd have to say "it's okay for my kid to disembowel someone in a video game, but God forbid that they see full sexual penetration--the kind that they don't even allow on HBO or Cinemax--in that video game.
Did you see Jon Stewart making fun of the fact that it's up to store policy for Best Buy to prevent a 10 year old boy from purchasing Saw or Hostile, and imply that maybe it should be a federal law? No. Just as Yee and the supporters behind this stupid law only care about a child being exposed to violence when the child happens to have a game controller in their hands.
THIS is the double standard. Just because they showed a scene from Mortal Kombat and not The Witcher 2 doesn't suddenly make this into a debate over sex vs. violence. It's not about that, and it never was about that.
Log in to comment