@mariachimacabre: Hmm. I dunno man, the Ottos weren't that old, only becoming an empire in 1453, while some of western europe is older and has never really fallen, i.e. England. And then if you mean as in they carried the legacy of Rome from the ancient age to the modern age, you could also counter that with China, though China is totally out of my historical knowledge to be honest.
This is getting a bit tiring, lets just go play some video games.
@mariachimacabre: Uhh, bro, the Ottos were the followers of Osman, a sunni who lead a conquest of anatolia and who's descendant took Byzantium from the last of the Romans. They destroyed the ERE, they weren't their heirs; unless you think just having the land counts.
@mariachimacabre: Oh, you mean in modern times? The title of the last Romans is pretty contested though, the Ottomans, the HRE, Mussolini's Italy, and the Russians all laid claims to the name.
The creators made the game the way they did because they wanted it to be that way. If a game is challenging, it's funner for some people, it gives them a sense of accomplishment once they get all the objectives or whatever. You seem to just want to cruise through the games, which is fine, but there are other people besides you who play and don't want that. To remake a game specifically for your tastes would ensure that you and maybe a handful of other people buy it, but would drastically shorten the appeal for many and would make the effort a waste of time and money.
Log in to comment