http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2012/03/23/do-positive-mass-effect-3-reviews-reveal-a-conflict-of-interest-in-gaming-journalism/
What are your thoughts on this article? What's interesting is the reaction to this article by gaming journalists on twitter.
What's even more interesting is the dialogue between Jim Sterling and the author of the article.
What do you guys think of all this? I think it's interesting that an outlet like Forbes is being more critical in one article than most mainstream videogame journalist sites are in their entirety.
Log in to comment