Something went wrong. Try again later

BlastProcessing

This user has not updated recently.

970 431 48 46
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

BlastProcessing's forum posts

Avatar image for blastprocessing
BlastProcessing

970

Forum Posts

431

Wiki Points

46

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#1  Edited By BlastProcessing

@Dallas_Raines said:

@BlastProcessing said:

@Krullban said:

@Bourbon_Warrior said:

@EnduranceFun said:

@Bourbon_Warrior said:

@EnduranceFun said:

Can we get an article about the brazen sexism of Cyberpunk 2077?

Thanks Pat-san~

Are you serious? What's sexist about a android getting shot after she massacred a whole street of people?

Your post is exactly why we need an article on it. :/

I don't see how a sexualized mutilated woman's body is even comparable to Cyberpunk 2077 trailer, I think you'r just being silly now. But you are the one that got all butt hurt about the #1reasonwhy articles, posting hundreds of comments in those comment sections alone to become the No.1 commented user in December, so congratulations on that I suppose....

Patrick has actually stated that the Cyberpunk 2077 trailer is sexist. I assume this is where the original comment has come from.

I imagine it was. When he said that, I don't think I ever cringed so bad during a bombcast.

Ryan's the one that started that entire conversation, though. Patrick was simply agreeing with his take on it.

Regardless of whoever said it, still cringeworthy.

Avatar image for blastprocessing
BlastProcessing

970

Forum Posts

431

Wiki Points

46

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#2  Edited By BlastProcessing

@Krullban said:

@Bourbon_Warrior said:

@EnduranceFun said:

@Bourbon_Warrior said:

@EnduranceFun said:

Can we get an article about the brazen sexism of Cyberpunk 2077?

Thanks Pat-san~

Are you serious? What's sexist about a android getting shot after she massacred a whole street of people?

Your post is exactly why we need an article on it. :/

I don't see how a sexualized mutilated woman's body is even comparable to Cyberpunk 2077 trailer, I think you'r just being silly now. But you are the one that got all butt hurt about the #1reasonwhy articles, posting hundreds of comments in those comment sections alone to become the No.1 commented user in December, so congratulations on that I suppose....

Patrick has actually stated that the Cyberpunk 2077 trailer is sexist. I assume this is where the original comment has come from.

I imagine it was. When he said that, I don't think I ever cringed so bad during a bombcast.

Avatar image for blastprocessing
BlastProcessing

970

Forum Posts

431

Wiki Points

46

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#3  Edited By BlastProcessing

@Xeirus said:

@BlastProcessing said:

@Xeirus said:

@BlastProcessing said:

@Xeirus said:

@BlastProcessing said:

At least Patrick didn't quote himself this time. Still, this progressive, Kotaku-esque clickbait shit needs to stop, It's a horrible statue made in bad taste, nothing to cry about.

I'm guessing you're a guy, who hasn't delt with sexism. You shouldn't dismiss things you have no experience with.

Well if I wanna learn more about the topic, I'd much prefer having articles that tackle both sides of the coin, and aren't sensationalist.

Why isn't there at least one argument that's from the other side of the statue debacle in this article? I'm sure myself and others would like to hear from the other side as well.

You realize the articles are written in response to the other sides actions right?

They issued a statement about it, that IS their side of the story.

Do you seen a male opinion on the subject? Sexism doesn't apply to just females.

Was the statue a male with his dick hanging out?

The article is about reactions to this statue.

Just because the statue has tits, doesn't mean that males are not allowed to have an opinion on it.

Your logic is pretty...sexist.

Avatar image for blastprocessing
BlastProcessing

970

Forum Posts

431

Wiki Points

46

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#4  Edited By BlastProcessing

Guys, on Suburban-All Stars "Karaoke Godfathers" album, Giant Bomb's very own Jeff, Ryan, and Alex objectify women as nothing but sex objects. They are misogynist PIGS! I demand their immediate resignation! Zero tolerance!

Avatar image for blastprocessing
BlastProcessing

970

Forum Posts

431

Wiki Points

46

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#5  Edited By BlastProcessing

@Xeirus said:

@BlastProcessing said:

@Xeirus said:

@BlastProcessing said:

At least Patrick didn't quote himself this time. Still, this progressive, Kotaku-esque clickbait shit needs to stop, It's a horrible statue made in bad taste, nothing to cry about.

I'm guessing you're a guy, who hasn't delt with sexism. You shouldn't dismiss things you have no experience with.

Well if I wanna learn more about the topic, I'd much prefer having articles that tackle both sides of the coin, and aren't sensationalist.

Why isn't there at least one argument that's from the other side of the statue debacle in this article? I'm sure myself and others would like to hear from the other side as well.

You realize the articles are written in response to the other sides actions right?

They issued a statement about it, that IS their side of the story.

Do you seen a male opinion on the subject? Sexism doesn't apply to just females.

Avatar image for blastprocessing
BlastProcessing

970

Forum Posts

431

Wiki Points

46

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#6  Edited By BlastProcessing

Why do I have the feeling that if Dead Island was a respected series, like GTA, we wouldn't be having this conversation? I imagine when GTA V launches, you'll be able to shag prostitutes and kill them once again, but everyone will just laugh it off as "oh, GTA!"

Avatar image for blastprocessing
BlastProcessing

970

Forum Posts

431

Wiki Points

46

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#7  Edited By BlastProcessing

@AMyggen said:

@BlastProcessing said:

Can we get another member of the Bomb Crew, who's preferably a voice of reason, and not an obnoxious libtard to write an article about "sexist" matters for once? Maybe if someone like Alex took a crack at it, people wouldn't be so up in arms.

Actually, I just want someone competent to tackle this.

PS: All the members of GB seem to be very, very liberal. So you probably won't find any "voice of reason".

The difference is the other duders don't flaunt it. Did you by chance see Patrick's twitter on election day? Just ridiculous.

Avatar image for blastprocessing
BlastProcessing

970

Forum Posts

431

Wiki Points

46

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#8  Edited By BlastProcessing

@RoyCampbell said:

@RobbleWobble said:

@RoyCampbell said:

@heatDrive88 said:

@RoyCampbell said:

This just screams "I needed justification for my outrage so I gathered up a handful of women's responses and regurgitated it on my LiveJour- I mean Giantbomb's front page."

You're a huge piece of shit of a person. Sorry.

Thanks. Feel free to let me in on any other insights you possess.

Im with Heat.

No Caption Provided

Oh god, that just made my day! Thank you, kind sir (or ma'am)!

Avatar image for blastprocessing
BlastProcessing

970

Forum Posts

431

Wiki Points

46

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#9  Edited By BlastProcessing

@StarvingGamer said:

Wait, so half the women writing here were complaining about the breasts look like implants... so does that mean it would have been ok if they were more naturalistic looking ones...?

It'd be ok if it was a man with an inadequate penis.

Avatar image for blastprocessing
BlastProcessing

970

Forum Posts

431

Wiki Points

46

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#10  Edited By BlastProcessing

@Xeirus said:

@BlastProcessing said:

At least Patrick didn't quote himself this time. Still, this progressive, Kotaku-esque clickbait shit needs to stop, It's a horrible statue made in bad taste, nothing to cry about.

I'm guessing you're a guy, who hasn't delt with sexism. You shouldn't dismiss things you have no experience with.

Well if I wanna learn more about the topic, I'd much prefer having articles that tackle both sides of the coin, and aren't sensationalist.

Why isn't there at least one argument that's from the other side of the statue debacle in this article? I'm sure myself and others would like to hear from the other side as well.