Something went wrong. Try again later

expensiveham

This user has not updated recently.

394 7275 8 2
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

expensiveham's forum posts

Avatar image for expensiveham
expensiveham

394

Forum Posts

7275

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@stonyman65 said:

@opusofthemagnum said:

Have you considered a QHD 144hz? I already have a really gorgeous Sony 65" 4K right past my desk for 4K goodness and for more serious gaming I just picked up a 2K 144hz from Dell that looks pretty sharp. It looks much clearer than 1080p and the 144hz thing is something I can barely stand to give up at this point. Especially if you play a lot of shooters or other faster-paced games, it's a great way to go.

Otherwise, what are your priorities? What brand of GPU? Price range? Do you want response time or image quality?

I think 1440p @144hz is better deal than 4k @60hz. Not only will it be easier to run games in general but 144hz is something special if you have the hardware to run it, especially at 1440p. IMO the only reason to go 4k at this time is if you need that resolution for work productivity or video/image editing. Anything else you're probably better off just with 2 nice 27' 1440p monitors if you have the desk space.

I second this.

Avatar image for expensiveham
expensiveham

394

Forum Posts

7275

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#3  Edited By expensiveham

@ssully: You must have gotten at least one legendary. You are guaranteed at least one legendary every 10 boxes or so. The game literally looks at your most recent drops and will make it a 100% chance for a legendary if you have not gotten one in a while.

Avatar image for expensiveham
expensiveham

394

Forum Posts

7275

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Looks really slick. Hope they make more changes to how the website looks, some parts look really bad.

Avatar image for expensiveham
expensiveham

394

Forum Posts

7275

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

I had never even heard of the original but want to check it out after seeing how much love the developers put into the project.

Avatar image for expensiveham
expensiveham

394

Forum Posts

7275

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@zippedbinders: It's not the same thing though. Nintendo does not own (or cherish) Bayonetta 2 in the same way as the Mario or Zelda franchises. Nintendo may own the rights to Bayonetta 2 but it's not like SEGA is out of the picture, there is still a SEGA logo on the box for Bayonetta 2. All I was trying to say is that it might be possible for SEGA to spend the money and get full ownership for Bayonetta 2 if they wanted to and could convince Nintendo. I also outlined some reasons why I believe Nintendo would agree to such a thing.

Avatar image for expensiveham
expensiveham

394

Forum Posts

7275

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#7  Edited By expensiveham

As a pc gamer its baffling to me that Sony would give developers the power to disable screenshots/recordings, they should have just made it allowed all the time.

Avatar image for expensiveham
expensiveham

394

Forum Posts

7275

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@redhotchilimist said:

They can't port Bayonetta 2 away from Nintendo platforms. It's like Sony and Demon's Souls/Bloodborne. They funded it, so it's not gonna happen.

Yeah, just like Segas other Wii U exclusive: Sonic Lost World. Oh wait.. http://store.steampowered.com/app/329440/

Nintendo pulled Wii U of shelves, they don't care about owning Bayonetta 2 anymore and it did not even fit their catalog in the first place. I'm sure they would let Sega get the rights to publish on PC for next to nothing.

Avatar image for expensiveham
expensiveham

394

Forum Posts

7275

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Palmer is a kid who didn't get the chance to grow the fuck up because he became a famous multimillionaire. PewDiePie is the same way. They're only going to get more entrenched in their shitty views as time goes on. 1) because they are so far removed from the world most people live in. 2) they look at the world/media as their enemy.

It might sound weird, but I would never want to be them.

Considering how the mainstream media (WSJ especially) has covered Pewdiepie he has every right to be disgusted with them. The way they've angled that stuff is insane and unethical.

Avatar image for expensiveham
expensiveham

394

Forum Posts

7275

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

As long as they are not marked as actual reviews I don't see the problem with tying unscored impressions to a game.