Something went wrong. Try again later

Gigabomber

This user has not updated recently.

177 0 0 1
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

Gigabomber's forum posts

  • 33 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Avatar image for gigabomber
Gigabomber

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@wwen: People only pay attention to radicals. Could blame the news, but it's bigger than a lust for ratings.

Avatar image for gigabomber
Gigabomber

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By Gigabomber

@spaceinsomniac said:

And yes, pretty much any political term can be used as a pejorative sense, but I don't view any of those words as insults.

--

Political parties and television pundits have hijacked the words. At this point, it is almost impossible to use them without strong political connotations, so I almost never use them. Many of the people that do outside of interviews, I noticed, hurl them as insults or use them as straw-man abusing, reductive tools.

--

@gigabomber said:

@spaceinsomniac:

Libertarian is different, but to me, stands for small government, the leave-me-alone party. Kennedy also labels herself as conservative, which overrides Libertarian, so you know where 90% of her talking points are going to come from. So boring.

Interesting that you feel that way. Why do you feel that conservative overrides libertarian?

--

I feel that a true libertarian would refuse to associate themselves so closely with either primary party because neither is overly concerned about preserving liberty for the average citizen, and to me, conservative is just a limp cover for Republican. I look as it as a way for a Republican or Democrat to appeal to a wider audience while still saying "I'm really one of you" to more hardline members.

Just to make sure I'm not confused, I looked up libertarian on wikipedia: "Libertarians seek to maximize autonomy and freedom of choice, emphasizing political freedom, voluntary association, and the primacy of individualjudgment."

The parties aren't interested in any of this unless it translates to a vote, which means they are primarily interested in maintaining and amassing power. Libertarians are only interested in the power to be left alone.

--

I tend to discuss things issue by issue. This bewilders many people I talk to because they are immediately trying to type me once the conversation shifts to politics, because someone that talks about these things has to clearly support a party agenda. I tend to look more closely at the local and state issues rather than the big ticket items.

Avatar image for gigabomber
Gigabomber

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By Gigabomber

@spaceinsomniac: MSNBC, seemingly overnight, becoming the counterpoint to Fox and just as repulsive, but Fox is the original, at least for me. They get high ratings. The worst part is that the talking points reduce debate into known, predictable quantities.

To clarify, I was trying to make the point that when the average throws around liberal/conservative, it equates to Hardline Democrat and Hardline Republican, and is generally meant as an insult; same for the word socialist.

Libertarian is different, but to me, stands for small government, the leave-me-alone party. Kennedy also labels herself as conservative, which overrides Libertarian, so you know where 90% of her talking points are going to come from. So boring.

Avatar image for gigabomber
Gigabomber

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By Gigabomber

Since this was necro'd, I'd like to point out, mostly for any non-American readers, that liberal and conservative are terms that have become almost completely entangled with party politics in the US, and that most of the population has internalized the corresponding democrat or republican talking points to go along with the respective liberal or conservative moniker (people hurl them as insults). Socialist is an insult thrown around against "liberals" as well.

Currently, if someone throws out that they are a liberal or democrat, you can simply list the things that person ascribes as their core political beliefs and be 90% correct; vice-versa for conservative and republican. This is why it is extremely dangerous for any writer that values their career to come out as conservative, because that party is associated with many things that aren't popular including some extreme examples of xenophobia, racism, and the pervasive love of nascar, all three of which are quite popular in the States if you look for them.

If a writer or newscaster exposes that they have any beliefs that may fall into anything in the republican cannon, the narrow-minded will assume they are also racist/xenophobic and blacklist them (happened to me once). This is a risk you can't take if you are in a public job and everything is on the internet, because one of these people might be your future employer. On the other hand, it could also get you a job because other narrow-minded people will label you as being in their in-group, which is fine as long as you want to work for a FOX affiliate for the rest of your life.

Avatar image for gigabomber
Gigabomber

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By Gigabomber

@yummylee: The inclusion of semi-trial-and-error platforming is actually putting me off of the game. It just doesn't make sense, so I'll need to watch a few sections. Sounds like they made a ton of decisions that break the flow of the game for the worse.

Avatar image for gigabomber
Gigabomber

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I felt that Jeff was referring to being pulled into calling something shit due to the zeitgeist around a film or game. Being goaded into saying something is shit through Twitter doesn't interest him as he has exorcised those demons.

I'm here because Jeff is hilarious, his reviews and opinions on games are generally solid, he is honest, and he shits all over games that deserve it. Can't watch a UPF or listen to a bombcast without him.

Avatar image for gigabomber
Gigabomber

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By Gigabomber

@chaser324: @rikiguitarist: Not custom graphics and GUIs, but there are custom servers that host up to 100 players in a searchable, gamespy-type of format.

You can pick campaign and custom tracks tracks from each of the 4 handling models and tilesets, game time length, track style for player filtering, minimum driver level, and private or public hosting among other things. Way more than any console game I've seen...at least within memory.

Way closer to PC Trackmania than I imagined.

Avatar image for gigabomber
Gigabomber

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@rikiguitarist: Nope. No one buys a console so that they don't have to budget for hardware upgrades.

Avatar image for gigabomber
Gigabomber

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By Gigabomber

I feel like MPP 5 had playable minigames, and the crowd was a great addition, so there is the distinct possibility that the video series has peaked. Dan can't really surpass his dickishness in MPP5, right? Either way, I'm dying to find out.

It would also be pretty great if they decided to end the series unceremoniously, and 10 years down the road Jeff admits that they got better after 5. Would be even more of a twist if they actually played them and liked the future MPPs, but Dan begins to hate the series. It would be an elaborate troll, but is not beyond Ryckert and the crew to execute if the future games are shorter.

Avatar image for gigabomber
Gigabomber

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I always hated the rescue civilian missions, but now having civilians morph into weird shit with a shit ton of health is stepping over the line. I think people can accept RNG but having a close range enemy just spawn with a ton of health, when wounded soldiers take fucking forever to heal is just lazy design. They keep taking concealment away from me, even though I'm a gorilla force. The further I get the less and less I like the changes. It seams so arbitrary where every move just becomes a roll of the dice, they should of added a fail state on movement to top of the cake.

I guess this just means I need to be super conservative with story progression and just grind out better armor and weapons.

Feel the same way about the previous game. RNG they had felt forced. I'll wait for heavy modding or an expansion before buying.

  • 33 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4