And yes, pretty much any political term can be used as a pejorative sense, but I don't view any of those words as insults.
--
Political parties and television pundits have hijacked the words. At this point, it is almost impossible to use them without strong political connotations, so I almost never use them. Many of the people that do outside of interviews, I noticed, hurl them as insults or use them as straw-man abusing, reductive tools.
--
@gigabomber said:
@spaceinsomniac:
Libertarian is different, but to me, stands for small government, the leave-me-alone party. Kennedy also labels herself as conservative, which overrides Libertarian, so you know where 90% of her talking points are going to come from. So boring.
Interesting that you feel that way. Why do you feel that conservative overrides libertarian?
--
I feel that a true libertarian would refuse to associate themselves so closely with either primary party because neither is overly concerned about preserving liberty for the average citizen, and to me, conservative is just a limp cover for Republican. I look as it as a way for a Republican or Democrat to appeal to a wider audience while still saying "I'm really one of you" to more hardline members.
Just to make sure I'm not confused, I looked up libertarian on wikipedia: "Libertarians seek to maximize autonomy and freedom of choice, emphasizing political freedom, voluntary association, and the primacy of individualjudgment."
The parties aren't interested in any of this unless it translates to a vote, which means they are primarily interested in maintaining and amassing power. Libertarians are only interested in the power to be left alone.
--
I tend to discuss things issue by issue. This bewilders many people I talk to because they are immediately trying to type me once the conversation shifts to politics, because someone that talks about these things has to clearly support a party agenda. I tend to look more closely at the local and state issues rather than the big ticket items.
Log in to comment