MrNeoshredder's comments

  • 12 results
  • 1
  • 2
Posted by MrNeoshredder

@chplusink: No, I'm essentially saying that Minecraft is boring and unfinished. It hardly has any interesting features or things to do, and the things it does do, like the previously mentioned AI and combat, are extremely terrible. There's certainly lots of exploration, but there's never anything interesting to find. You could find your first diamond block in about 2-4 hours, although you wouldn't need the diamond because the enemy AI is idiotic and the combat is so simple that you could beat pretty much any enemy in the game by standing still and hitting them when they get too close. There's nothing else to find underground. There's no use in trying to find the underground strongholds either, as they are empty, barren, boring, and filled with nothing but items that are much easily craft-able on your own. The only reason you would ever go to a stronghold is to go to "The End" and fight the Ender-Dragon.The Ender-Dragon fight is not fun in the slightest, he's artificially difficult because the combat is so simplistic and the AI is so bad that it can't make a genuinely challenging enemy, so he just recharges his health every time he flies by those spires. After you beat him, you get a bunch of EXP, which you won't need because, as I said, the enemies are easy as shit. There's literally nothing left to do after that except build your house. I don't see the appeal of going back underground over and over again, gathering the same minerals over and over again, to build a virtual house that I will never need to use in the game, as after I finish it, there's no reason to go back to the game. I can't see anyone playing this game for more than maybe a week before having to use a mod to make it actually fun to play. A lot of people go into multiplayer to socialize with friends, there are plenty of better games to socialize and play with your friends in. It's incredibly boring to play in both single-player and multiplayer, I'm saying if it had more direction as an actual game it could have been fun, I used an RPG as an example because RPGs are similar to....whatever Minecraft is with its standard action-reward formula.

Posted by MrNeoshredder

Guys, I have no idea what the hell is wrong with Jeff, but this game isn't very good. It's not bad, but it's not exceptional in any way. The gameplay is okay, be it the cover system is pretty bad, but the story is HORRIBLE. Nearly everyone is written completely out of character, a lot of the dialog is cringe worthy, the Joker-EDI subplot is the most retarded thing I've ever seen, and the endings are god awful. Oh and the plot? Here's an example of it: The Reapers, a synthetic race created by organics, know that they are far more advanced than the organics, and the organics will naturally get wiped out by the Reapers. So in order to save the organics, they must wipe them out to harvest and preserve their genetic material. Let me recap: The Reapers need to destroy the organics to save them from themselves. WOW!

Posted by MrNeoshredder

@Gerhabio:

Nah, because regular guys suck at everything a game character needs to do to make the game fun.

Posted by MrNeoshredder

@popmasterruler:

Have you even played the game? The puzzles and platforming were actually implemented pretty well. The platforming was fun and interesting in their own right, especially when you were shrunk, it broke up the action quite nicely. Of course, every time the Giant Bomb cast says a game sucks, people always jump in to indefinitely agree with their brainless, joyless, humorless asses. I love how they take points off of Duke Nukem Forever because the premise of the game is stupid, like they actually expected this to be a serious game or something....I wouldn't put it past them, after all, they constantly embezzle money off of their fans with that whole "Premium Account" bullshit. Also, I find it very funny that they criticize the humor in this game, when they themselves say stupid shit like "Uh uh uh yeah" to perhaps make somebody laugh at what a pathetic attempt at humor. Just by looking at the review, I can see Jeff didn't explain anything at all. Why is the shooting boring? Why are platforming and driving sections bad? Why is the game-play repetitive? Why are you such a fucking idiot? We'll never know, because everyone here at Giant Bomb is a terrible reviewer that never explains any of his points in detail. Watching these guys trying to give a valid opinion on a game is like watching a dog trying to turn a doorknob; "Oh look, he doesn't have thumbs, he's still trying to do it but never will!"

Edited by MrNeoshredder

A Batman game without Batman? PASS! ....alright, maybe I'll try the demo :D

Posted by MrNeoshredder

@Acheron:

Shame on you for making assumptions...yup.

Posted by MrNeoshredder

@OneManX:

Saints Row 3 wasn't funny...

Posted by MrNeoshredder

@MattClassic:

This game is so bad, it doesn't even deserve to eat the shit of Duke Nukem Forever.

Posted by MrNeoshredder

It's nice to see an apocalypse game that is based around actually surviving the apocalypse and not just killing everything in it.

Posted by MrNeoshredder

Didn't Half Life have a bunch of first person platforming in it? So, a big part of Half Life is considered bad by these guys.

  • 12 results
  • 1
  • 2