Something went wrong. Try again later

Oldirtybearon

This user has not updated recently.

5626 86 43 79
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

I hate Kotaku.

 Why the hell do I go to Kotaku?

It's a question I've been struggling with recently, but perhaps some back story in is in order?

Over the past month or so, I've been mostly reviewing my Internet-viewing habits. Internet shows I watch, forums I frequent, and even websites I visit have fallen under the dutiful eye of scrutiny. The more I've thought about what I do online, the more I've realized that about eighty percent of the sites I visit, the shows I watch, and the people I interact with are just pointless.

However, this particular post is about Special K. Kotaku. The Gamer's Guide. You know the place that has more typos than an ESL classroom's first lesson?

Or how about the one place where a creepy gaijin gets paid to write about schoolgirls in their underwear?

Yeah, you get the point.

Kotaku used to be a good website, I thought. Whenever I had found myself taking inventory of my news sources, I found myself putting Kotaku almost always to the top of the "keep" list. I'm not sure why, now that I think about it. It could have been the staff, although I don't like any of the writers. Or perhaps it had to do with the quality journalism, although most of Kotaku's posts seem to be two lines of text followed by a republished article, and a misleading headline or two.

Really, looking back, I have absolutely no idea why I've been going to Kotaku all this time.

I don't think it's for the community, though. The people over there, I've found, are not only rude and obnoxious, but they also slavingly pander to the staff of Kotaku as if the "journalists" were gods perched atop Olympus itself. The community at Kotaku also tend to treat comments as their own personal sounding board to bitch about anything. Just today there was a short post about Machinarium being on sale for $5.00. What's the first user comment?

Why of course, it's decrying people who pirate media as soulless, unfeeling monsters.

What bugs me about this is not that it is two-faced and hypocritical, but that the balls on the users of Kotaku are so big that they threaten to crush what little integrity the site has left. Seriously, whoever put it in the minds of the Kotaku faithful that piracy was anywhere near the same level as murder, rape, or even theft needs to have the concept of piracy explained to them. 

Of course, try arguing that with the Kotakuites and see how far it gets you.

Honestly, I think I'm done with that place. Giant Bomb's community may act like a bunch of "cool story bro" dicks sometimes, but the truth is that I'd take the fun and loose atmosphere of this site over that pseudo-intellectual wankfest that masturbates to pictures of Crecente's hair while discussing how intelligent they are.

So I guess, uh, long live the Bomb.    

61 Comments

61 Comments

Avatar image for ch13696
ch13696

4760

Forum Posts

204

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

Edited By ch13696

Wait. Is Kotaku that one site that tries to turn anything into a story? For example, "Mother of two that dies in a car crash used to play Gran Turismo"

Avatar image for roycampbell
RoyCampbell

1092

Forum Posts

545

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By RoyCampbell

While I can agree with the fact that there are a lot of problems with Kotaku, especially Brian Ashcraft (oh, an erotic Japanese game just got Twitter support!! Let's make an entire article about it.), I have to say, the starred commenter system is my biggest gripe.
 
I do have a star on Kotaku, but  when I didn't, it made me feel lower than the starred commenters. Just not cool. Ever since I was starred though, I've made sure to use that promote function as much as I could; make everyone feel even. Not to make myself out to be better than most of the starred commenters, but there are a lot of starred douchebags. So I try to make sure the grays have as much as a voice as the starred folks do. 
 
Contrary to popular belief in this thread, the community is actually what has made me stay. That Michael "King of Puns" Dukakis guy is a joy to behold. I have to say, though. There are a ton of elitist douchebag commenters. Be it a pro 360 stance, pro PS3, or in my opinion worst of all, pro PC. I make sure to ignore those posts. Arguing over your platform of choice is one of the dumbest, pointless things you can do with your life.
 
All in all, I still like Kotaku. Not as much as I did a year ago, unfortunately. One little disagreement or critique can most likely get you banned. Of which that stuff wasn't happening last year. 
 
Oh and a lot of articles that have nothing to do with gaming at all but are sometimes tied loosely to gaming. Yep.

Avatar image for turambar
Turambar

8283

Forum Posts

114

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Turambar
@KingWilly said:

"
I don't think it's for the community, though. The people over there, I've found, are not only rude and obnoxious, but they also slavingly pander to the staff of Kotaku as if the "journalists" were gods perched atop Olympus itself. The community at Kotaku also tend to treat comments as their own personal sounding board to bitch about anything.   "

I honestly don't see how giantbomb is any different in that regard.  The amount of staff hero worship that goes on here is fucking creepy.
 
That said, I have definitely went to Kotaku (particularly on weekends) far less since Maggie Greene left about 3 years ago. 
Avatar image for jomu
JoMu

125

Forum Posts

11

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 4

Edited By JoMu

Giantbomb and Kotaku are the only 2 gaming sites I've found that don't get blocked at work. (surprised that a site called GiantBomb doesn't get blocked but not complaining.)  I don't mind the non-gaming stuff on Kotaku since some of it is stuff I would also be interested in. When I'm looking for news, I just click on the article and look for the link that points to where the info in the story came from.  Once I get to the comments section, I stop and move on to the next article. The community over ther is my least favorite thing of the site. I don't think there's anything that would "fix" it but getting rid of their whole star system would be a start. Somebody needs to introduce them to Dr. Seuss and The Sneetches.
 

Avatar image for turambar
Turambar

8283

Forum Posts

114

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Turambar
@EliasT said:

" @DoctorOptimist said:

" This explains why I hate Kotaku and other snarky journalist websites.
 
Also, responce poster here (quoting is fucking up for some reason) Tommy Tallarico isn't a jackass, so fuck you.
 
  

"
This NEEDED to be posted, thank you sir. "
Irony: When he mentioned the E4 part, the GB staff is square in his sights as some of the guys that just hated on it from the start.  Or was I the only one that remembers that podcast? 
Avatar image for turambar
Turambar

8283

Forum Posts

114

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Turambar
@AURON570 said:
" Kotaku is pretty garbage. The reason I love Giantbomb is because there's a sense that the guys (Vinny, Jeff, Ryan, Brad etc.) are putting stuff out for the community. And they have fun doing it! Watching the endurance run, quick looks, mail bag videos, i love mondays, the bombcast, all make it feel like I'm sitting there right beside them watching/listening to it all go down. "
In that sense, comparing Kotaku and GB is like comparing apples and oranges since while Kotaku doesn't provide that sense of community, I don't think it ever inteded to, nor is the site structure really designed to.  
 
Also, shall I point the rather blatant contradiction in the GB disliking Kotaku for all its non-video game related stories but enjoying GB for stuff like the bombcast, which is often filled to the brim with non-video game content.  This isn't being thrown at you, but people in general who seems to criticize Kotaku for that quite often.
Avatar image for ssully
SSully

5753

Forum Posts

315

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By SSully
@nk19 said:
" you need to get out more. "
Coming from a person who has hundreds of posts more then the topic creator. 
Avatar image for shady
Shady

511

Forum Posts

255

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By Shady
@Apathylad said:
" @JJOR64 said:

" @Linkin10362 said:

" @empfeix said:
" I go to Kotaku for gaming news - could careless about community or typos/bad writing.  Just want to know whats going on.
This. "
This. "
That's like saying you go to Hooters for the food - considering how many non-gaming stories Kotaku posts on a regular basis. 
 
Kinda off-topic, but has anyone seen the Kotaku parody site at Something  Awful? I found it pretty amusing. Gameblogguu! "
I found it funny how Kotaku never mentioned or linked to that article. They're usually pretty good at linking (and I mean that literally as some post are just links) to stupid shit.
Avatar image for fr0y0
fr0y0

176

Forum Posts

132

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By fr0y0
@Linkin10362 said:
" @empfeix said:
" I go to Kotaku for gaming news - could careless about community or typos/bad writing.  Just want to know whats going on.
This. "
2This.
Avatar image for turambar
Turambar

8283

Forum Posts

114

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Turambar
@dudeglove said:
Yeah, there are fanboys, but at least the main five guys don't take themselves seriously. There's no... humm... how to best describe it? No nastiness, or agenda behind GB's material. They realize that games are meant to be entertaining n'stuff, and the content on this site reflects it. Screwattack kind of has a similar kind of format as well. Kotaku, on the other hand, is positively chock full of holier-than-thou ivory tower opinions that offer absolutely no insight (two words: Tim Rogers). "
I guess I don't really read Kotaku as much as I thought I do, but I rarely ran into articles that I felt were unbearably masturbatory.  Tim Rogers is definitely a big one, but thankfully his ramblings are only on there once a month.  The same can be said for some of Luke Plunkett writings.  But I've never really gotten that vibe from most of their articles.  Both Totilo and Crecente are pretty good editors imo and Fayhe gives me a vibe similar to that of the GB crew.