Played it last week. Definitely wasn't a generic brawler. It was quite amazing. Also, the OP hasn't done his research. This game also has detective elements, stealth, etc. Not just brawling.
Lol at the guy with sour grapes saying this game will probably suck. I'm sorry, but nearly every preview has been very enthusiastic. This is my most anticipated game of the year, and I finally got to play the GameStop demo last week. It was seriously awesome.
Hm. I didn't know about that. I don't think I'm "bashing" them without justification, though. They have some pretty lackluster mods that invoke the ToS when the thread didn't even deal with providing links.
I was suspended indefinitely today from GameSpot. Why? Because I supposedly encouraged illegal activities. I was discussing the upcoming DC of Watchmen, which I was able to see early. In the thread, I did not submit any links. I only offered to answer questions about the movie only...and yet I was suspended for providing illegal links, when I never even did that?
Also, has anyone ever noticed that government-sanctioned prohibition on a social level generally fails, and in fact succeeds in increasing support for certain social issues? The Prohibitions of the past only encouraged finding new ways to bypass the social dictation of a hungry government.
Fei said: I to am non-religious. I mean that government shouldnt even need civil contract. I have a 3 year ... [more]
I respect you for stating this. Legislating morality is wrong. I oppose many things that are law, but I acknowledge that my personal views cannot dictate the entire legal system. I can personally oppose something, but, like the Libertarian platform says, we can't let our personal views precede legality and the reality of the matter. I have a gay brother who pays his taxes, volunteers in his community, etc, but, according to some Republicans, he's a pedophile who should be controlled by the government's views.
I think the Republicans didn't do enough when they had Bush and Congress before 2006. I simply believe that it will become a power game between the two parties. One party wins, the other party demonizes them until the next election, and it continues. We need a viable third party.
I see what you mean. There are a few complexities. If you live together with your partner, and there are deaths or a divorce, a settlement must be made to sort out who receives what. How would the legality behind this hold up if we didn't have some sort of legal contract to confirm that the two individuals did indeed have a relationship that would qualify them for a piece of the settlement? There are other situations where not establishing some civil contract would be tricky. However, I do agree that the government is way too involved in marriage.
Log in to comment