But I always thought that Dan's problem was an experience and exposure to information problem, not a "brain" problem. A lot of his questions here show he has an interest in understanding things to a deep level. So, with all respect to Jeff, it almost feels a little tragic that whenever this sort of thing happens he's only talking to people with a surface-level understanding of the topic, whereas if he was given time with good, relevant science communicators, I feel like he could develop a deeper appreciation for all of these things.
Obviously this is Giant Bomb, and "Dan learns from actual (patient) scientist" isn't really a show for this site, but I think I'd actually watch that. Might even be a good format for kids to learn from, with his rapid-fire nit-picky detail questioning.
This was amazing, and feels extremely Giant Bomb. Great host, great production value, great pulls of weird old clips. I love VoidBurger's confidence and presentation style, all around great.
I think it feels extremely most YouTube essays, rather than Giant Bomb. But that's ok, and it seems ok. If they do get her on another show as some comments request, I hope they get a name to say though, because throwing to someone with "...and what about you, VoidBurger?" would sound kind of childish. But then I thought that during E3 anytime someone called that guy "Golden Boy" to his adult face.
And significantly better than the usual CSRF invalid error which never happens on any other site on the internet that meant I had to reload this page to say so.
tdous's comments