Going down the original list and dealing only with the pre-Civil War and Civil War presidents:
John Tyler: "Vetoed the national bank twice, ended the Second Seminole War, and ran as an independent"
Unconstitutionally annexed Texas, dedicated most of his term to enriching the slave South, promoted John Calhoun, the worst American in history, to secretary of state, and did more than anyone else to cause the Civil War.
Martin Van Buren: "Avoided war abroad, lowered tariffs, and kept laissez-faire economic policies."
War with Britain was incredibly unlikely (if noted Anglophobe Andrew Jackson did not start one, it was not going to happen) and his laissez-faire economic policies were so effective that they led to the biggest recession in American history to that point. You also give credit to Tyler for ending the Second Seminole War, but cast no blame on Van Buren for being president for most of its duration.
Thomas Jefferson: Reduced taxes, reduced the federal debt, and cut military-spending.
Wrecked the economy for no particular reason with the embargo and pursued perhaps the most incoherent foreign policy of any president in history (destroying the army while simultaneously courting war with the most powerful nation in the world)
Ulysses S. Grant: Put the US back on the gold standard, avoided war with Spain, and 15th amendment.
A pretty good president, though given he held some of the most expansive pre-FDR views of federal power I'm surprised he makes the list.
Zachary Taylor: Peaceful treatment to Indians, ended Manifest Destiny, and opposed Henry Clay.
Taylor's treatment of Indians was typical of presidents in his era. Manifest Destiny did not end, given the near constant attempts to buy Cuba or conquer Latin American countries in the aftermath. To his credit, he agreed with Clay on the things Clay was right about (economics) and disagreed with him on the things Clay was wrong about (the Compromise of 1850).
James Monroe: Monroe Doctrine, laissez-faire economic policies, and vetoed corporate welfare.
Presided over a huge economic downturn, nearly let the country fall apart over the Missouri Crisis, and his misconceptions over the party system led directly to the disastrous election of 1824.
George Washington: Neutral foreign-policy, served two terms, and exemplified veto authority.
A great man.
Andrew Johnson: Rightly fired Edward Stanton, opposed radical reconstruction, and pro-Constitution.
Opposing Radical Reconstruction was one of the worst decisions any president has ever made and a century of disenfranchisement and impoverishment followed directly from his decision. Along with Buchanan, one of the two worst presidents in American history.
Andrew Jackson: Dismantled the national bank, advocated for hard money, and paid off the debt.
Opposing Nullification is to his credit. Everything else he did led either to economic ruination in 1837 or overwhelming violence to nonwhites.
John Quincy Adams: Non-interventionist foreign policy, opposed slavery, and peaceful towards Indians.
A good man, but he accomplished nothing of note as president. A great congressman and a better secretary of state though.
Millard Fillmore: Abolished slave trade in D.C., neutral foreign-policy, and didn't do much.
Presided over the pro-slavery Compromise of 1850. Became a virulent nativist after leaving office. Otherwise accomplished nothing of note besides being too ineffectual to properly enforce his pro-slavery policies.
The only presidents who were any good were Lincoln, FDR, and Washington. Everyone else gets in line behind them and range from "kind of OK" to "monsters of historical significance."
Log in to comment