@TheAdmin said:
@Excast said:
It's kind of a shame. I know both the tested and giantbomb guys have to try and pretend to be happy and optimistic about this move, but we all know what the end result is going to be. Tested is going to turn into Mythbusters land with little of the Will, Norm, and Gary charm that made the place what it was. Giantbomb is going to eventually get folded back into Gamespot.
Anyone that pretends this isn't going to happen/is happening is just being naive. RIP Tested and soon to be RIP Giant Bomb.
I think the same thing. this whole thing reeks. First, we won't see Gary Witta say "shoot that Guy" on tnt. Hear Will Smith on the bombcast trying to pronounce "exectutable". Getting annoyed by Matt Rorie's puppy's on BLLS. (we might but will probably be rare) Whiskey media was like a family and one of the best entertainment value I ever followed, they were all involved together in many different levels. It started 5 years ago with just Giantbomb and became a phenomenon. It was more than GB, it was WhiskeyMedia. I had similar feelings when Rich Gallup left Gamespot few years back, but what happened today is not even close to what happened back then. It's a part of an entire family that's now leaving. Sure, giantbomb will get better, more content, more budget, more anything, but it will not feel the same. Sorry for the bad pun, but this is how you dismantle a bomb
Second, business wise, it doesn't make sense to have 2 similar services or products on the same roof. Sooner or later one will take over the other, and guess what. It's rarely the one that got bought that do so. Sure GiantBomb may keep its name, but only one will call the shots. Imagine GB and GS competing for the same coverage on E3, PAX, GDC etc. Viewers will either watch GiantBomb or Gamespot and CBS might need to take a decision where to put its budget. WM was great because they all offered different services, they were no competition there. GiantBomb may do quick looks, informed podcasts, random pc games, but at the end of the days, it's still video game coverage and Gamespot already offers that. But hey that's just speculations, I hope i'm wrong, or that they can prove me wrong.
I get the whole making money for a living part, but this doesn't seem right. Surely there were other solutions?
Log in to comment