Who Update...
By WerePaladin 1 Comments
Well, it's been a bit since I've written anything in my Blog-y thing here on Giant Bomb, and after my last whinge-y post about the Daleks, I thought I should set the balance straight and write some more positive feedback on recent episodes.
I've since managed to devour the next three episodes, entitled "The Time of Angels", "Flesh and Stone" and "The Vampires of Venice". I'm going to (try and) give my thoughts on these episodes, but keep the *spoilers* down to a minimum, just in case any of you out there are (somehow) further behind on episodes than we are here in Australia. However, consider this your official warning should you be sensitive about that sort of thing - don't say I didn't tell you, K? :)
The two-parter involving the return of the Weeping Angels (last seen in "Blink", an awesome episode from a couple of series back) was amazing. Firstly it was written by Mr. Steven Moffatt, which means that you're in for a treat. Besides that, it appears that the acting of Matt Smith and Karen Gillan has improved since the "Victory of the Daleks" particularly in some of the scenes in the second episode where Amy is suffering some visual difficulties. With the improvement in acting comes an improvement in story and pacing. In these episodes, there were no moments where I sat there and said "How did they get that done in such a short period of time?", like in the previous story.
As for the characters, it was good to revisit Doctor River Song at an earlier point in her history, before she becomes Professor Song as encountered in "Silence in the Library" and "Forest of the Dead". Actually, about River Song - I have some thoughts to share with you all on her... Actually, since I'm going to quote some parts of the episode when I pose my questions, I'm going to put the next section in those cool *spoiler* sections.
The most recent episode Anna and I watched was "The Vampires of Venice". Nice lil' story there as well. Please note, this one was not written by SM either (for those of you who may accuse me of snobbery), so I think it's more a matter of the fact that I don't like Mark Gatiss' writing that much. *shrug* Definitely enjoyed seeing Rory adventure with Amy and the Doctor, even if he was a bit lame in parts. Also enjoyed the acting and the story - nothing too earth-shattering, but still some good parts to it. Even enjoyed the "Are they Vampires or not" mystery (which I won't spoil by answering here - go watch the episode yourself! *grin*)
My only real complaint (well, it's kinda two - but they are linked) involves the Perception Filter things. They seem to work by altering someone's brainwaves to see something different than what is there, right? So how does someone remove clothing that is part of a perceptual illusion? And how does a mind-altering illusion protect someone from sunlight? (Case in point, creepy Vampire girls being afraid of the sun early in the episode, compared to de-cloaked Vampire guy being atomized by sunlight later in the episode) What the? Apart from that lil' glitch, I quite enjoyed the story, and am looking forward to the next few, particularly with some of the rumoured returns of original series foes that I've read around the place. :)
Oh, one other thing. Did any of you notice the cool lil' continuity reference when the Doctor attempted to flash his psychic paper, but instead pulled out his library card? Any of you recognise the face on the card?
So what are your thoughts, people? Did you enjoy these three episodes as much as I did? I'm happy to go into some more spoiler specific discussion with any of you about it, but just wanted to make sure you've seen the episode first. What about my theory about River Song? Am I on track or way out there? Do you have a different theory as to what's going on with her or not?
That'll do for tonight, early start for work in the morning. So while I go off to read some of the Doctor Who spin off fiction about Faction Paradox, don't forget to...
GAME ON! :)
Log in to comment