With recent complaints about reviews such as too human and star wars: the force unleashed, i have questioned how a review should be written. This is not only for user reviews, but as well for major game websites. Should a review be written on how much fun the reviewer had, and only count a small amount off for glitches or flaws? Or do glitches and flaws really take away from the experience of a game? There could be an arguement either way. I believe that glitches and flaws shouldn't dramatically drop a score for a game, unless the game is completely broken and nearly unplayable.

The little green dude from star wars.
For such a little man, Yoda is one of the strongest Jedi out there... But How!? Of course any star wars fan knows that the force is strong with him.
So why does everyone love the little green creature? Because he is little and knows how to use his lightsaber and force powers!
Every Star wars fan loves watching lightsaber battles that Yoda is involved in.

I Prefer the light side over the dark, although in some star wars games i will choose the dark side just to see the effects.
The truth is, Yoda is awesome if you're a fan of the light side. Some may prefer Vader, but not me. It's going to be great seeing how Yoda Plays in the upcoming Soul Calibur IV... Since he is so little and jumpy.

What do you think of Yoda and the light side? Or do you prefer the dark side!