Quick Look: ArmA III

Thompson820

Follow

425

Forum Posts

1857

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Thompson820

@eccentrix said:

@aceofspudz said:

@eccentrix said:

@simkas said:

Yeah, ArmA is really only fun if you have a bunch of other people to play with, being part of some kind of community is pretty much a requirement to have fun in ArmA multiplayer.

Sounds like not a good game.

Sounds like you don't know what you're talking about.

"X is really only fun if you have a bunch of other people to play with, being part of some kind of community is pretty much a requirement to have fun in X multiplayer."

If it needs the external entertainment of other people to prop it up, it's not entertaining in itself. I'm not saying anything about ArmA, I'm just saying simkas isn't making it sound good by saying it's not good by itself. If something isn't fun by itself, it's probably not fun.

That's like saying "Call of Duty Multiplayer isn't fun without other people so it isn't a good game" or "TrackMania isn't fun without other players so it's not a good game".

ArmA is not, was not, and probably never will be a game designed to be played by one person by them self, if that's how you want to judge it you're going to dislike an awful lot of games.

10 years ago

eccentrix

Follow

3250

Forum Posts

12459

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 15

Edited By eccentrix

@thompson820: "[B]eing part of some kind of community is pretty much a requirement to have fun in ArmA multiplayer" for me translates to "Having friends to play with is a requirement for this game to be fun." I don't think that's such a big leap.

10 years ago