145 Comments
  • 145 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Edited by cityfires

You're right where you were

I'm right where I am

Somewhere between unsure

And this iOS game

Posted by mlarrabee
Posted by aquamarin

An iOS game. Hmm...

Posted by shadowwolf9

Oh, these iOS games...

Posted by Mr_Skeleton

This game is unplayable on iPhone.

Posted by Max_Antrax

I remember this, it was a flashgame like 5 years ago.

Posted by sixpin

This does not look like fun.

Edited by Porkellain

Glad to see Ryan is covering this.

EDIT: Since they changed the headline for Antichamber's QL this post makes no sense.

Posted by chubigans

Really glad to see iOS games on the site now. Woo!

Posted by RecSpec

I gave up when it got to the constantly red circles, fuck those things

Posted by Spitznock

It's always nice to see new content on the site, and I know the early portion of the year is slow where game releases are concerned, but I'm still on the fence about these iOS game quick looks...

Seems on par with going to a site like Newgrounds and quick looking flash games. They're all worthy of peoples attention, but it still seems odd to me.

Posted by Bell_End

@Spitznock said:

It's always nice to see new content on the site, and I know the early portion of the year is slow where game releases are concerned, but I'm still on the fence about these iOS game quick looks...

Seems on par with going to a site like Newgrounds and quick looking flash games. They're all worthy of peoples attention, but it still seems odd to me.

well if people don't watch them then im sure they will just stop doing them due to lack of interest.

so if you don't like it... well you know what not to do

Edited by Sooty

iOS games suck for quick looks. It's dumb because you can't see the touch points, it seems that the game is playing itself.

I'm not saying they should just show iOS games with someone filming them using the devices, but these two reasons are why iOS videos are dull.

Posted by SatelliteOfLove

MYRMIDONS

MYBROTHER

CRASHKEYS

etc

Posted by aquamarin

I wish I could take my (maybe) view back. All I did was start it up, then click ahead half way through and exit out. Damn.

Posted by civid

1. Patrick gives actual good advice

2. Brad agrees and understands what he says 100%

3. Brad continues to do the exact opposite, while he says he is completely aware of his mistake.

I love Brad QL's so much xD

Edited by civid

Also I don't understand what the fuzz is about these games. I mean, it's basically flash games, what's next, GB starts covering onemorelevel.com games?

Edited by brainwins

I don't understand the buzz surrounding this game. I'm at level 75 and it's not that amazing, some of the levels I'd say are even lazy or bad. I guess it's what a good campaign does to an OK game.

Posted by Igottadeuce

@chubigans:

'Time to Ryan'.

Edited by alibson

Quick Looks of ancient flash games.

JEFF DO SOMETHING, you're our only hope.

Posted by DSale

@Sooty: +1

Posted by chilibean_3

The trailer for this didn't give me nearly enough information for what this game was. Thanks for Quick Looking it. There is no way I'd get this for my phone.

Posted by beard_of_zeus

@SatelliteOfLove said:

MYRMIDONS

MYBROTHER

CRASHKEYS

etc

FOLLOW THE BOMBS (and money)

Posted by JayCee

2013. The year Giant Bomb discovers iOS games.

Posted by CoinMatze

I stopped playing at 28. I wanted to break my ipad so bad.

Posted by PacManFevaa

I think PR stands for Personal Record.

Posted by Romination

@sixpin said:

This does not look like fun.

Yeah, I really don't see it. Maybe if I played it? I don't know, man.

Posted by Counterclockwork87

So many losers complaining about free content...Jesus, the Giant Bomb crew have talked about various iOS games for years, and now they finally have a capture kit. The whining...

Posted by JNaut

Do not buy this for iPhone, as others have said. It's way too frustrating on the small screen.

Posted by Abendlaender

@Romination said:

@sixpin said:

This does not look like fun.

Yeah, I really don't see it. Maybe if I played it? I don't know, man.

I played it and I still don't really get it. Eh, might just not be my kind of game

Posted by bonesquad

I was a bit disappointed with Hundreds. Aesthetically it's great, and I like the idea behind the gameplay, but its execution falls short. There are a handful of really cool levels, but the majority are either too easy/uninteresting as it walks you through new mechanics or they are a chore to play (any level with sawblades or disappearing bubbles).

I beat 92/100 levels and have no desire to play more. Not even the unlocked endless mode. I'd put Hundreds in the 'decent but not great' category of games.

Posted by Veektarius

Nice caption, Drew.

Posted by SuperSambo

@Sooty said:

iOS games suck for quick looks. It's dumb because you can't see the touch points, it seems that the game is playing itself.

I'm not saying they should just show iOS games with someone filming them using the devices, but these two reasons are why iOS videos are dull.

Numbers rise when touch points are activated... Seems pretty simple to follow.

Posted by Outrager

5 minutes into the video and I'm still not really sure what the rules are.

Brad really doesn't seem to like explaining how to play the games unless someone asks him to do it. Usually the other person will play dumb and ask Brad to explain what he's doing and why, but Patrick doesn't seem to be doing it. Maybe they'll explain it later in the video though. Time to keep watching.

Online
Posted by SharkMan

@SuperSambo: yeah man, i don't get it. there is nothing on the screen to indicate where he is pointing, i think if they do ios games further they are going to need to explain step by step what is going on when they do it. an introduction before the quicklook begins.

Posted by gregoryc

I don't care if giantbomb does quick looks of iOS games. But apparently some people do care, and really want their opinions to be heard, sarcastically or otherwise. Oh well, more videos on the sites = more views.

Posted by SlashDance

This really does look like the opposite of fun.

Posted by Vexxan

I don't think I would enjoy playing this for more than five minutes.

Posted by Mumrik

@Max_Antrax said:

I remember this, it was a flashgame like 5 years ago.

Story of the life of so many mobile games.

This... was a QL I skipped through.

Posted by sirdesmond

I do not understand people's love of this game. It is the most basic trial and error style "puzzle" mechanic that just has you redoing levels over and over and over until you happen to get it. It's just not fun.

You can tell Brad is super frustrating with it while he's playing it from all the UGHS and such.

Posted by sirdesmond

@alibson said:

Quick Looks of ancient flash games.

JEFF DO SOMETHING, you're our only hope.

Jeff was the one who started the whole "quick look everything" mentality.

Edited by Pudge

@sirdesmond: I don't think he meant cell phone diversions when he said that. Are we going to do Quick Looks of Tiger Electronics games next?

EDIT: I take it back. After watching this Quick Look, I'd say that my old Duck Tales or Aladdin handhelds are much more rewarding and challenging games than this "game"

Posted by Wacomole

It makes me sad to see a bunch of people who have supposedly made gaming their hobby effectively dismiss a huge portion of that market for the flimsiest of reasons.

Posted by DasUberOgre

@MoleyUK said:

It makes me sad to see a bunch of people who have supposedly made gaming their hobby effectively dismiss a huge portion of that market for the flimsiest of reasons.

Dat truth.

Edited by adamfedoruk

@Pudge said:

@sirdesmond: I don't think he meant cell phone diversions when he said that. Are we going to do Quick Looks of Tiger Electronics games next?

I'd watch that.

Man, watching Brad do the exact thing over and over as he continues to fail makes me want to slap that iPad out of his hands. I hate it, but I love it.

Posted by sirdesmond

@Pudge: Considering a puzzle game like Hundreds is something that they would have done a video for if it was on Steam, I don't see why it is so terrible for them to do if its on an iOS device. It just seems like that annoying internet bit about "real" games. It's a video game and they do videos of video games.

They have done Quick Looks of 10,000,000, Spaceteam, Angry Birds Trilogy, Splice, and plenty of other games that could be considered similar to Hundreds in their puzzle-like quality, being on mobile devices or primarily using mouse or touch for controls.

Also, I would totally watch some Tiger Electronics games.

Posted by Splodge

@alibson said:

Quick Looks of ancient flash games.

JEFF DO SOMETHING, you're our only hope.

These are fun, and I have never seen this game. Dont like it, dont watch it.

Posted by rubzo

@Sooty said:

iOS games suck for quick looks. It's dumb because you can't see the touch points, it seems that the game is playing itself.

I'm not saying they should just show iOS games with someone filming them using the devices, but these two reasons are why iOS videos are dull.

And other games are horrifically dull to watch if you can't see the controller?

Posted by pakattak

This is some damn good graphic design.

Posted by Sunjammer

I suppose I just find a demonstration of a 60 dollar game more valuable to me as a consumer than a 1-dollar diversion. But hey, if all you want from this site is watch other people play video games, awesome for you.

  • 145 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3