@sammo21 said:
Here's the thing guys...don't like it? Don't buy their games. Most people who get upset and over it still buy the games. Most people who say they are going to boycott a game or company still buy their stuff.
Just don't.
What if these are the kinds of games I want, but I want them without the shitty microtransactions?
OK, I don't actually much care for the kinds of games that get filled with microtransactions now - but if you had told me a few years ago that this generation would have a few new Star Wars Battlefront games coming out, I'd have been pumped. I loved those games as a kid. But I don't want to buy this new one because of all the microtransactions. I do want to play Destiny 2 because I enjoyed the first one, but again - it's got microtransactions and I don't want to pay $60 and then get asked to pay even more money.
If you're really into the big multiplayer games every year and that's all you really play, you're getting shafted by all of them now. Destiny, Halo, Battlefront, Call of Duty, Overwatch, all of them are just machines made to suck more money out of you and it's depressing and it just sucks. It's even worse for people whose circle of gaming friends do buy into those games and suddenly they're left without much social gaming anymore.
There was a time where I thought microtransactions in full-priced games would be OK, because it would mean that the meaningful content would be free. But I would happily go back to paying $15 for a map pack every three months or so if it meant we could be rid of all these fucking microtransactions. Well, if I played multiplayer games anymore, that is - I stick to mostly single player games and most of the games I'm interested in haven't fallen victim to these microtransactions yet. At least not directly, EA shut down Visceral Games and it seems like that's at least partially because Visceral wasn't making a game that could print EA money.
Log in to comment