Something went wrong. Try again later

BlackRedGaming

You can go to blackredgaming.com to find a prettier and more organized form of my blogs.

273 2 3 7
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

Ranking of Assassin's Creed Part 5: Assassin's Creed 3

No Caption Provided

Welcome back to my ranking of the Assassin's Creed games. For those who don't know how it works, these blogs are the explanation to why and how a game is in its place on the ranking, while the ranking itself can be found here. I am playing through all AC games released on PC, and primarily focusing on the single player parts of the game. Without further ado, let's get right into Desmond's last journey.

Instead of playing as Ezio, you now play as a Native American nicknamed Connor in colonial America. You are the son of a Native American Woman and a British Templar father, but your father left you and your mother tried to raise you in the opposite direction. After seeing a vision through an apple held by your tribe leader, you are sent off to a man Achilles who reluctantly trains you in the ways of the assassins. From there, you go off into a journey just like any other to stop the Templars from gaining too much power, including your father, by fighting your way up the chain of command. Meanwhile in the present, you and your crew find a secret base built by those in the first civilization that was meant to stop the world from ending the first time. Now, you go around the World in search of keys that can power up this base and stop the World from ending again.

What better place than any to start with story? And man, did it suck. I was fine with the game leaving the Ezio story behind because I think even great things must come and go, but what I found as the replacement was not great. The story of Connor itself took a LONG time to get to. There is a point for me in every open world game where I feel the game has given me all of tools necessary to be in this open world, and for this game I felt that I was ready when I put on the robes as Connor. The problem with that train of thought is that you start the game as your father, and you spend hours playing as him before you get to play as Connor, and then you spend another hour or so playing as a younger version of him learning more tutorials on hunting. So before you can begin your quest to level the food chain, you have to go through hours of gameplay to get there. Now I will say that your father's crew are some of the best characters in the game and the story had a good twist that I didn't see coming when you finished your father's path, I just couldn't help but hate the pacing of the game. But there is more. I believe that since the past story plays pretty similarly to each game (meet new people, invest yourself into the current political landscape, kill everyone in the Templar food chain), I think having good characters is key to a good story. This game doesn't really have any. Again, I am not asking for Ezio and his crew back, but I do still want good characters and this game didn't deliver. Sure, your father's crew isn't all that bad and I enjoyed some characters here-and-there in the homestead, I just didn't find anyone all that interesting or fun to be with.

Since AC3 doubled down on history, I found myself meeting a lot of historical figures such as Ben Franklin, Sam Adams, and even George Washington. But I found those characters to be uninteresting as well. Believe me when I tell you, I would do almost anything to get the five minutes I spend listening to Ben Franklin give me nine reason why dating older women is better back. But I found the increased amount of history bad in other ways. Since we are talking about a time that is pretty well documented, I found myself being a part of many historical events. It was I who rode the horse while Paul Revere was on the back warning others about the British. I was there dumping tea in the harbor. I was the turning tide on many battles, and I was there when the declaration of independence was signed (I think). But I found this increased history to be goofy more than cool. Where before I would meet Da Vinci and a few others and they all had there own plot separate from history, this game plopped you right into the history, and I didn't really find it all that great. The historical aspect makes the game feel like a picture where you glued your own picture into another to act like you were in the photo more than actually putting you in the photo. But if you thought I was done there, then you are wrong.

The historical aspects feel as awkward as this picture.
The historical aspects feel as awkward as this picture.

So the characters are uninteresting and the historical take is awkward. What else is there? Well, I thought the colonial American setting pretty boring (and this will affect gameplay as well), the writing and cutscenes awkward (need I remind listening to nine reasons why I should date older women?), the story was littered with stupid moments like asking where I live despite being within 100 meters of where I live or somehow being wanted for murder in Brazil (in the modern story) despite never being there before, and Connor himself feels dull and dumb. And that is just the past story, let's get into the modern story.

Now I will say that the modern parts overall are better than previous games. I actually didn't hate my time playing through the different locations around the world trying to get the keys. But the story really falls apart at this game too. In the modern time, you are hunted down by a pretty cool villain, only to kill him before you really learn anything about that person, the death of Vidic felt sudden, dumb, and uneventful despite being the main villain throughout all of the modern AC stories, and the ending felt confusing and acted like it was going to give you a choice only to not give you that choice. The battle to choose between Minerva and Juno was hard not because they both brought compelling, but hard because I felt like I knew so little between them and then the ending made me act like I knew them well. Where the past story ending was okay (surprise, you end it will killing the last guy on the chain), the modern ending felt like a bad way to send off the Desmond story. And overall, I felt that the story and all of its elements were weak compared to its predecessors. But how does the gameplay hold?

Nice wagon.
Nice wagon.

Well, not much better. The game felt like a push in a different direction, which I am find with because I like change. But the push they made was in the wrong direction and I ultimately wish it went back. It felt like some of the missions you can do in the world were gutted and replaced with far more boring quests like mail delivery, beating up a single guy, and picking up certain items. Level design for the missions felt like something I had to deal with more than something I enjoyed, as for they were boring at best and cumbersome at worst. For a game about being discrete, stealth was terrible. The parkour had poor collision, so whenever I try to chase someone or run away I find myself climbing on top of boxes or climbing up walls despite not wanting to. To speed things up: Combat felt clunky, the combo kill move is back, beggars are back, recruit contracts aren't as fun, menus are unwieldy, lockpicking is horrible, the American frontier setting made the maps feel barren, a collectible type runs away and makes life harder, the HUD feels terrible, notoriety is all screwed up, controls feel limited, I can't kill two guards at the same time with hidden blades despite having two blades, fast travel both within each city and between cities is cumbersome to unlock, the music wasn't as great as the previous games, I can't equip items from the menu, I keep getting spotted despite being incognito, and the game is riddled with bugs far worse than any other AC game I have played so far with stuff like texture flickering, crashes, a convoy I can never get back, dead bodies distorting, and more. The gameplay had a LOT of rough edges, but not everything was bad.

While the gameplay was not great, there were a few shining parts to it here and there. I would say the biggest addition I enjoyed was ship combat. The game is full of missions where you can sail the high seas and engage in ship combat. While this is a lot of fun, I wish it was something I could just do instead of doing a mission. Some new equipment like ropedarts are pretty fun to use (though I also feel that some equipment like the hookblade are missing). While contracts are bad and city building is gone, a new trading system has taken its place where you buy wares and send them off on convoys for profit.Some new mission types like forts (similar to Far Cry outposts) and city liberation mission are fun and have some cool effects on trade. The graphics have noticeably improved again, horses are back, you can uncover the map by going places as well as sync points, the combo kill system has been somewhat fixed with some enemy types stopping your combo, you can now whistle to attract enemies to your position, you can now hunt (even though I never felt the need to), recruits now have new abilities like being a bodyguard or starting a riot, some cool counter cutscenes can be activated if two enemies attack at the same time (though it is rare), some new gambling mini games don't hurt, and a new collectible is introduced after the game that was pretty cool to try and hunt down. Despite all of that, I found my overall experience to be hollow, and at the end I was just doing homestead missions because it was cool to see the area grow with new people (though I couldn't really choose what missions I wanted to do for who). I find this game hard to go back to and keep playing for whatever reason because of how hollow and bad the gameplay was.

Before I conclude, as always, I talk about multiplayer real fast. And for this game, it is fast because I didn't play it. The game tried to put me through a lot of tutorials, which I skipped, and in the end no one was playing. Still, multiplayer doesn't have a big impact on this ranking, but I still talk about it anyways.

I found this blog hard to start because I never felt fully finished with the game. Even though I have tried everything this game had to offer days ago, I kept going back because I feel there is something missing. There is just something off about the game, and throughout my time I could never find that missing piece of the puzzle. I didn't want to write this until I figured out what it was, but I just couldn't. But that is what the whole game feels like: the game in the whole franchise that is 'off.' Everything that is great about the previous games is now poor in this game. The experience as a whole feels hollow, and I just can't help but not like it. I know people like to say that it's a bad AC game but still a good game, but I don't even feel that is true for me. AC3 is a bad game, and because of that it ranks dead last now and I guess it will stay towards the bottom by the end of this. I expected better from an AC game.

How do you feel about this game? How is your ranking of AC? Put them in the comments below. And as always, thank you for reading.

7 Comments

7 Comments

Avatar image for notnert427
notnert427

2389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 1

I have a bit of a soft spot for this game. I don't know if it's because this was my first AC game, because it resonated a little with me due to some Native American heritage, or maybe a bit of both, but I enjoyed the setting quite a bit. It's a pretty damn good-looking game as well. There's something fittingly American about trying to carve out your own space, so the Homestead stuff was pretty rad to me. Successfully accomplishing this was fairly satisfying, as was taking down better-armed forces with primitive weaponry, because that's a nice fantasy contrasted with the tragic reality of Native American culture being essentially bulldozed into oblivion via manifest destiny awfulness, but enough on that.

The Frontier manages to capture a bit of the appeal of the wilderness better than most video game depictions. I kinda loved the idea of guerrilla-style ambushing patrols in lands I knew and they didn't, especially given that there's some historical accuracy to that for the period. It made things feel like you were defending your homeland. Also, I found Connor to be a more interesting character than the "dashing hero" protagonist that's in almost every other AC game (and most videogames on the whole, sadly). Admittedly, he's overly brooding, but it mostly fit the narrative, and I appreciate that they had the stones to tell a less "fun" story.

I will say the character switcheroo was just dumb and annoying. I'll also agree that the historical stuff felt forced, but that's the case with most AC games. It's also worth noting that the ending is one of my least favorite missions in anything ever. Man, it's bad. I didn't share your affinity for the modern-day stuff, either, but that's likely due at least in part to the fact that I wasn't invested in the Desmond storyline with ACIII being my first AC game. I honestly don't even remember much of the modern-day stuff at all, other than being mildly annoyed at its existence.

ACIII is a flawed game in a lot of ways, but I still liked it quite a bit. Maybe I give it too much credit, because it's not even really the in-game story that I like; it's more the thematic elements of it combined with the setting itself that kinda worked for me beyond what's there as a game. I guess I'm trying to say that I enjoyed it in spite of itself. And while some of it felt a little half-baked, the game's pretty ambitious in a lot of ways considering the boat stuff, the crafting, etc. Ultimately, I can both understand why most people don't like ACIII and think it's maybe a little better than it gets credit for.

Avatar image for rorie
rorie

7888

Forum Posts

1502

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 3

I liked Connor more than most (although the Anakin Skywalker circa Episode II resemblance is uncanny when you see it), but what I mostly remember about this game is the super-lame ending. I was all set for an epic battle with your father, but nope: footchase. I think the AC series has never quite figured out how to do their big setpiece fights right; you always wind up fighting someone with an Egg and they take forever to go down. Here they just didn't even really bother to try, though. I'd say I still had fun with the game but it's definitely one of the low points of the series.

Avatar image for blackredgaming
BlackRedGaming

273

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 7

@notnert427: Funnily enough, AC 3 was my first AC experience too. I played it years ago on my Wii u, but it's been so long that I couldn't remember everything. I think I remember then that I had a good time with it too. I think that playing through them all has set an expectation that the game doesn't meet, and because of that my experience was worsened. Funnily enough, the one thing people didn't like the most was the ending, and I was fine with it. The game did set up your dad as the main baddy, but I also thought the game did a decent job at diverting that focus towards Charles. I was disappointed with the chase instead of a fight (even though I was probably going to spam the counter move over and over like I did with one of the other guys), but I always enjoy an ending where the good guy and the bad guy look at each other in the eye and accept their fates. Just like you, I can understand why people enjoy this game and why people don't. I'm glad you enjoyed the game though.

Avatar image for blackredgaming
BlackRedGaming

273

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 7

@rorie: I really didn't like that footchase at the end. If I fought him instead, I probably would've just spammed the counter move over and over and that would've been lame too, but I would prefer that over chasing him with AC 3's terrible free running.

Avatar image for therealturk
TheRealTurk

1413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I have a deep loathing for this game. As someone who loved Assassins Creed 2, I really just wanted more of that but in the American Revolution. Instead, the game provided a downer of a main character and a plot that bordered on the incomprehensible. It was a major bummer.

Admittedly, part of that is my fault. I had an expectation in my head that the Founding Fathers, being Freemasons, were going to end up being the Assassin Order, based on the fact that the assassin logo looks a lot like a stylized compass and angle of the Freemasons. I was really hoping for an ACII situation, where you were going to significantly engage with the historical figures (i.e. I was expecting Benjamin Franklin to essentially fill Leonardo's role). When that didn't happen, I was disappointed because it would have been so much cooler than what they ended up doing.

I think a big part of my problem is how they just sort of glossed over a lot of the history, which is kind of part of the point of the AC games. Rather than engaging with it, they just seemed to want to get to the good "quotes," which ended up being completely divorced from any context. And given that the American Revolution is really well documented compared to the time periods the series had previously used, some of the errors they made were really perplexing, like the militia during the Lexington and Concord sequence wearing consistent uniforms.

Avatar image for deactivated-61665c8292280
deactivated-61665c8292280

7702

Forum Posts

2136

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

You know, I was pretty compelled by the dynamics of the father/son relationships in this game. I remember feeling very fatigued by the slow wind-up in the first act and very detached from the boating/naval mechanics--which just serve as a precursor to Black Flag, anyway--but I found much of the actual moment-to-moment stuff, the whole bit of running around in wintry treetops to stalk unsuspecting enemies, really novel at the time. Despised or have mostly forgotten all that happens in the Desmond side of things.

I liked it more than that third Ezio game, whatever that was called.

Avatar image for ntm
NTM

12222

Forum Posts

38

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By NTM

When I played through the game back when it came out, I thought the game was mediocre bordering on poor. It was boring, buggy, and... well that's bad enough as it is. That said, when I decided to give it another go last year when it became backward compatible, I actually really enjoyed it quite a bit. It still had issues, but it was a much better game than I remember. It also made me say 'hmm, let's see if I'll enjoy my second least favorite AC game' which is Unity, and to be honest, I also enjoyed that more too. Now, I can actually say that for the most part, I enjoyed every mainline AC game. I am not sure if I love AC1, though it's one I'd have to go back to and right now is a better time than any I suppose considering it's 4K on Xbox One X. Maybe I'll buy it on the X at some point (played it on PS3 originally). Something about AC3 that I have always thought though, even when I didn't like the game, was that it arguably had the best soundtrack, and that says a lot since there is some really good music in the AC games. As for the historical aspect, it to me was more or less just dressing while the story was really about Connor and how he fits into the world. I was okay with it and thought he was a bit more interesting than I originally thought too. Coming off of a laid back, suave Ezio if you will to a more serious character in Connor didn't really do much for me at first.