" @Brodehouse: At Reza's store, I knocked out the robber before getting the chance to start a conversation. I got the button prompt when I approached him from behind and it was over. From my point of view, Shelby did that to save the father who failed the trial. That's a character inconsistency born out of succeeding at the QTE "

Knights of the Old Republic 2. It just ended. Nothing was explained. Thanks Obsidian.

" @Viney212: If he is there to simply take care of the evidence, then the best solution for him is to simply let Reza die. Reza dies and the evidence trail stops with him. He also gets the option to search the store for evidence after his death since at this point, that's his only real hope (Reza had already refused to help him in any way) Instead Scott risks his own life to save someone who didn't measure up to his challenge. I understand he is not out to kill fathers but he is not their guardian angel either. This doesn't add up with the Origami Killer's actions."

The 1st game that comes to mind is nolan north's prince of persia. You spend 8 or more hours "healing the land" just to fuck it all up in 3 min. I did not play the DLC because the end of the game left such a bad taste in my mouth     

" Knights of the Old Republic 2. It just ended. Nothing was explained. Thanks Obsidian. "

"Why the sudden urge to clear all the evidence after nearly ten years ? Is Scott just an incredibly lazy procrastinator ?"  

"When I said Scott was opportunistic at the typewriter shop, I meant he seized the opportunity to kill the old dude (what's his name?) when Lauren wouldn't notice. It was a little opportunistic and certainly improvised; like you said - Scott probably figured he was in danger of being caught at that point. The worst part of that scene was that the players are actually in control of Scott almost the entire time (or so we are lead to believe). Why did he bring Lauren into the shop though ? And why is he leaving prints all over the place if he knows something might go astray ?"

Are we assuming the evidence he collects in the game is the only evidence he's ever collected in this way though?  Maybe he's been at it longer?  Maybe he's destroyed evidence from previous victims similarly?  Maybe why he's been able to avoid suspicion for 10 years while maintaining a trustworthy persona for the victims that he needs to collect the evidence from?

 He doesn't know that it will go astray though.  He was just there to collect evidence like he's always done, and Lauren is there because she forced him to allow her to take part in the "investigation" in exchange for the envelope.  He never planned to kill the old guy though, and he wasn't seizing an opportunity, he was taking his only course of action.  What other option did he have?  Opportunity had nothing to do with it.  He was simply backed into a corner.  The old guy found the evidence Scott was looking for, unexpectedly put the pieces together, called the cops and Scott was forced kill him.  The only reason the prints are any concern at all is because he was forced to kill the old guy before he spoke.  If the old guy didn't figure it out, Scott would have gotten his evidence without suspicion, and leaving finger prints wouldn't have ever mattered.  Just like any of the other evidence collecting scenarios.  But because killing the old guy was his only way to conceal his secret only THEN did cleaning the finger prints ever become an issue and he had to make up the excuse of the Origami Killer calling the cops to frame them. "

dead space didn't do much for me. 
 
admittedly, i had to do it twice because my game glitched. 
 
but the final boss battle was way too easy and then i just...left.

The Original Jak and Daxter..
 
I was so pissed at the end I tossed my controller. This is after I spent hours collecting 101 fucking Power cells!!

Knights of the Old Republic II

Kinda surprised no one mentioned the original Zone of the Enders. 
 
Man, fuck that game

I would say Borderlands, but let's face it, It didn't have a fucking ending.

"   Musashi: Samurai Legend  "

" You want to talk about the worst game ending, it's got to be Assassins Creed. My Jaw literally dropped on how bad it was. "

Being led toward a bad ending because of my choices didn't bother me too much.  When I beat the game, the killer went free and everyone else was either dead or completely screwed.  That's just the way that the story turned out.  I played because I was interested to see what would happen.  I didn't reload the game when I screwed up.  I just kept playing, and eventually came to a conclusion that was depressing.  The game has narrative inconsistencies the size of Texas, no doubt about it, but the idea that I was playing myself into a losing situation didn't bother me at all.

" Fallout 3. Hands down. "

A bit of a late reply, but I'm on your side with regards to the problems surrounding Scott Shelby. I just can't shake the feeling that someone else was meant to be the antagonist but somebody made a decision to make it Shelby for 'shock value'. "We'll make the overweight, asthmatic and friendly guy the serial killer! NO ONE WILL EVER SEE IT COMING!"