Something went wrong. Try again later

ZoomyRamen

This user has not updated recently.

255 14 20 18
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

ZoomyRamen's forum posts

Avatar image for zoomyramen
ZoomyRamen

255

Forum Posts

14

Wiki Points

18

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

#1  Edited By ZoomyRamen

I love my Vita. I feel it's such an underrated system. I have plenty of PSP games/minis/Vita Games to play on and use it. I feel every penny that I spent on the system on launch day has been well worth it. I hope Sony don't let it fizzle away because for me it's exactly what a handheld console should be.

Avatar image for zoomyramen
ZoomyRamen

255

Forum Posts

14

Wiki Points

18

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

#2  Edited By ZoomyRamen

Awesome! Hope people enjoy listening to it! Had lots of fun recording with the guys. sorry for my lack of knowledge about GW2. Played a lot more the following day and a bunch of my fears were pretty much gone by the end.

Avatar image for zoomyramen
ZoomyRamen

255

Forum Posts

14

Wiki Points

18

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

#3  Edited By ZoomyRamen

It's atrocious through and through. Writing was bad, acting was bad (Apart from Fassbender, but he was only good and was bettered by both Holm and Henrikksen). So many logical inconcistences. For example, why the FUCK would scientists take off their helmet on an unknown planet...It just wouldn't happen, no matter what the equipment said. Dumb dumb dumb.

Avatar image for zoomyramen
ZoomyRamen

255

Forum Posts

14

Wiki Points

18

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

#4  Edited By ZoomyRamen

Excited to discuss random shit with you!

Avatar image for zoomyramen
ZoomyRamen

255

Forum Posts

14

Wiki Points

18

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

#5  Edited By ZoomyRamen

@ck1nd: As I said, the audience watching the Microsoft conference don't care in the slightest. This is the worst place to announce shit like this. Also, Internet Explorer is dumb.

Avatar image for zoomyramen
ZoomyRamen

255

Forum Posts

14

Wiki Points

18

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

#6  Edited By ZoomyRamen

Yeah it's gonna make money but E3 is a conference that is watched by people and followed by people who don't give a shit about this. Seriously, the target audience for this stuff is not people who watch E3. This is shit.

Avatar image for zoomyramen
ZoomyRamen

255

Forum Posts

14

Wiki Points

18

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

Avatar image for zoomyramen
ZoomyRamen

255

Forum Posts

14

Wiki Points

18

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

#8  Edited By ZoomyRamen

It's a shame,I'm atrocious at these types of games, would have loved to have played this.

Avatar image for zoomyramen
ZoomyRamen

255

Forum Posts

14

Wiki Points

18

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

#9  Edited By ZoomyRamen

@Salarn: But that cheating could be cured by an offline mode...At the start just say you're not allowed to go online at all, no interaction with friends, cut them off essentially. Sure people may say it's only half the experience, but to me that's fine. I want to play Diablo 3, single player with no lag or risk of disconnections.

Played the Beta and TL2 looks awesome, and for about quarter the price it's a fantastic deal compared to what is included in Diablo 3.

And yeah, you're about that, my mistake. I'm sure many people will play that Blizzard game whatever it is, I myself will be very tempted too. It's just that Blizzard may have lost some goodwill that they had before. I don't know, I can only say that I myself am not too happy with them. And yes I'm insignificant, but what else can I say other than that? They're a good company and they've made some fantastic games, I just hope that this doesn't become a trend amongst not only Blizzard games, but games as a whole!

Avatar image for zoomyramen
ZoomyRamen

255

Forum Posts

14

Wiki Points

18

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

#10  Edited By ZoomyRamen

@Hunkulese: Well alright. Blizzard have designed a game around a micro transaction store. At the base, the game is revolving around something that is essentially there to squeeze money out of people. Something that is there that will enable Pay2Win. This is a FTP mentality built around a game that charges you $60 to enter. All the items being server side, all the mobs being server side is built around something that a chunk of people don't want. Always-on DRM is the worst of all DRM and it's there to facilitate a micro-transaction store. The game could have had mods, it could have had LAN, it could have had offline play, it could have been so much more if blizzard simply weren't looking out for there wallet.

And sure the flippant argument of "OH A COMPANY WANTS TO MAKE MONEY LOLOLOL SOMETHING NEW", but Diablo 3 would have sold gang busters whatever they were doing, they frankly didn't need the micro transaction store and basing security, and basing the game around the store has only cost them sales. Sure it may not be millions, but it's people who may not buy the next Blizzard game, people who have sworn off blizzard games, people who might not invest right away into one. Again, maybe not a mass amount but it's building.

All this, for a micro transaction store? What other reason outside of that is there? The item duping etc is an issue sure, but why would it matter if you forced seperate online/offline characters. Maybe the game would have to be changed NOW for something like that to happen, but initially when they were creating it, they could have thought about it. I take issue with it, because I love Blizzard, I played WoW for many years and I loved playing starcraft 2 despite always being destroyed by someone in Bronze. I want to support them, but when stuff like this happens, it takes the sheen off of what is, all shit like this aside, a great game.

Hopefully, this will give you a laugh or two if not, then I apologise.