Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb News

93 Comments

Some Ubisoft Games Not Playable on My Birthday

Ubisoft DRM means a server transition is impacting a number of games.

Ubisoft's approach to DRM is actually biting the company in the ass with a server transition.
Ubisoft's approach to DRM is actually biting the company in the ass with a server transition.

Ubisoft will be transitioning servers on February 7, and because a number of Ubisoft games have DRM linked to Ubisoft’s servers, those games will not be playable.

Some of Ubisoft’s most recent games, including Assassin’s Creed: Revelations and Driver: San Francisco, will not be affected.

“Ubisoft will be transitioning the hosting of many of its online services from a third-party data center to a new facility,” said the company. “During the transition, some Ubisoft services and online games will not be available. We apologize to our customers for the inconvenience. This move ultimately will help us improve the maintenance of our infrastructure and deliver better uptime and greatly improved services for our customers.”

Here’s the list of games that won’t be affected during the transition:

  • Anno 2070 -- PC
  • Assassin’s Creed: Revelations -- OnLive, PC, PlayStation 3, Xbox 360
  • Driver: San Francisco -- OnLive, PC, PS3, 360
  • The Settlers Online -- Web-based

Here’s the list of games that will be affected during the transition:

It’s unclear how long the server transition will take, with Ubisoft asking players to to follow its Twitter account.

None of this would be a problem if Ubisoft's games didn't have DRM, obviously.

Patrick Klepek on Google+

93 Comments

Avatar image for serhulse
SerHulse

712

Forum Posts

9733

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

Edited By SerHulse

@Branthog: as long as I can start actually playing it, it won't be too bad I guess but when you hear "Ubisoft", "DRM" and "Downtime" in the same sentence you can kinda jump to conclusions.

The reason I asked in the first place was I heard rumours that certain progression stuff is linked to the servers, so while the game will be playable, the downtime will have other side-effects, but judging by the vitriol around Anno and DRM around the internet, it's seems like that's already the case. :(

Shame, all of this.

Avatar image for branthog
Branthog

5777

Forum Posts

1014

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Branthog

@SerHulse said:

@Branthog: as long as I can start actually playing it, it won't be too bad I guess but when you hear "Ubisoft", "DRM" and "Downtime" in the same sentence you can kinda jump to conclusions.

The reason I asked in the first place was I heard rumours that certain progression stuff is linked to the servers, so while the game will be playable, the downtime will have other side-effects, but judging by the vitriol around Anno and DRM around the internet, it's seems like that's already the case. :(

Shame, all of this.

They do state that all UPlay stuff (the progression stuff, I believe - or at least the rewards you get to spend on some things in some games) will bee affected.

Avatar image for branthog
Branthog

5777

Forum Posts

1014

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Branthog

@Nefhril said:

One thing that worries me. What happens when they decide to take down the servers? Will I be able to play my games in 20 years that I payed for? Maybe they can remove the DRM with an update when the time comes?

I still play my NES games from time to time hell I even play on my Vectrex so I'm pretty sure I want to play some old school Xbox 360 games in the future :)

You're at the whim of the developer and/or publisher. Some have specifically stated that if you buy a game from them and they ever shut down or go away, they will update all the games to release you of the DRM locks. I think that is the case with Steam. With some . . . well, you're just fucked. Unfortunately, DRM only impacts those of us who are legitimate paying customers (and drives some of those legitimate customers to seek copies of games through other means). Those who don't pay for their games don't have to deal with the DRM, in the first place. So . . . it's all fucking pointless. But they don't care. A lot of the industry has their head so far up their asses that you'd think they were Hilary Rosen (former super-evil head of the RIAA) or Jack Valenti (former super-evil head of the MPAA).

Avatar image for darkwatersong
DarkWaterSong

107

Forum Posts

329

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

Edited By DarkWaterSong

And this is why I will only buy games with DMR that can be used off-line. I had some nightmares trying to play Assassins Creed 2 with Time Warner's DNS server crashing for 2 weeks, and swore off any game that is single player but needs the internet. And Steam does not count, because it could go into offline mode without issues.

Avatar image for branthog
Branthog

5777

Forum Posts

1014

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Branthog

@DarkWaterSong said:

And this is why I will only buy games with DMR that can be used off-line. I had some nightmares trying to play Assassins Creed 2 with Time Warner's DNS server crashing for 2 weeks, and swore off any game that is single player but needs the internet. And Steam does not count, because it could go into offline mode without issues.

What's ridiculous is that CD-KEYs should be just fine. They take the invasive bullshit out of the way and as long as you can provide the key, you're fine. It worked for many years and there is no way that they can contend that modern DRM is any more effective than a CD-KEY.

Avatar image for darkwatersong
DarkWaterSong

107

Forum Posts

329

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

Edited By DarkWaterSong

@Branthog: I am just par@Branthog said:

@DarkWaterSong said:

And this is why I will only buy games with DMR that can be used off-line. I had some nightmares trying to play Assassins Creed 2 with Time Warner's DNS server crashing for 2 weeks, and swore off any game that is single player but needs the internet. And Steam does not count, because it could go into offline mode without issues.

What's ridiculous is that CD-KEYs should be just fine. They take the invasive bullshit out of the way and as long as you can provide the key, you're fine. It worked for many years and there is no way that they can contend that modern DRM is any more effective than a CD-KEY.

That is why I am just praying the ME3 is not going to require Origin.

Avatar image for ajamafalous
ajamafalous

13992

Forum Posts

905

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

Edited By ajamafalous
@patrickklepek: You have the same birthday as my dad!
Avatar image for rarespine
RareSpine

39

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By RareSpine

I'm born on the 7th of February :(

Avatar image for bog
BoG

5390

Forum Posts

42127

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

Edited By BoG

Aquarians rule, Patrick.

Avatar image for suigyoken
Suigyoken

197

Forum Posts

477

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

Edited By Suigyoken

Oh man Patrick, what are you planning up for your birthday? Also I hope Ubisoft's phone support team will be riddled with people angry about this.

Avatar image for damnitsted
damnitsted

63

Forum Posts

387

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By damnitsted

woo! and I share a birthday! happy early birthday

Avatar image for john-luke
John-Luke

466

Forum Posts

563

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

Edited By John-Luke

That's what you get for being born.

Avatar image for radioactivez0r
radioactivez0r

949

Forum Posts

95

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

Edited By radioactivez0r

It's incredibly depressing that there is a company out there who won't allow you to play single player games you paid for for any period of time - it's actually intentional this time - and you guys are arguing over e-peens and birthdays. Do any of you actually care? Have you accepted it as part of life? Because it's bullshit. We should be up in arms over garbage like this.

Avatar image for thephantomnaut
ThePhantomnaut

6424

Forum Posts

5584

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 5

Edited By ThePhantomnaut

"Happy birthday zipperhead"

Avatar image for kerse
kerse

2496

Forum Posts

42

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

Edited By kerse

DRM just isn't the right answer, its not stopping pirates who really want to pirate anyways. Stuff like this is why I still prefer the consoles over PC.

Avatar image for spicyrichter
SpicyRichter

748

Forum Posts

102

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By SpicyRichter

@radioactivez0r said:

It's incredibly depressing that there is a company out there who won't allow you to play single player games you paid for for any period of time - it's actually intentional this time - and you guys are arguing over e-peens and birthdays. Do any of you actually care? Have you accepted it as part of life? Because it's bullshit. We should be up in arms over garbage like this.

I'm with you man, too much hate for each other, not enough hate for draconian DRM schemes that don't make a difference to piracy.

Avatar image for phrali
phrali

676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By phrali

people still play ubisoft PC games?

wtf?

Avatar image for overburning
overburning

15

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By overburning

Ubisoft continues to impress...

Avatar image for tourgen
tourgen

4568

Forum Posts

645

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 11

Edited By tourgen

@Branthog said:

@DarkWaterSong said:

And this is why I will only buy games with DMR that can be used off-line. I had some nightmares trying to play Assassins Creed 2 with Time Warner's DNS server crashing for 2 weeks, and swore off any game that is single player but needs the internet. And Steam does not count, because it could go into offline mode without issues.

What's ridiculous is that CD-KEYs should be just fine. They take the invasive bullshit out of the way and as long as you can provide the key, you're fine. It worked for many years and there is no way that they can contend that modern DRM is any more effective than a CD-KEY.

online checks are more about stopping used sales and lending out your copy to a friend when you're done with it. It's about propping a crappy game's market price over a longer period of time by limiting or removing secondary market. Pointing and throwing a crybaby tantrum over pirates is just a convenient marketing spin.

Avatar image for darkwatersong
DarkWaterSong

107

Forum Posts

329

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

Edited By DarkWaterSong

@tourgen said:

@Branthog said:

@DarkWaterSong said:

And this is why I will only buy games with DMR that can be used off-line. I had some nightmares trying to play Assassins Creed 2 with Time Warner's DNS server crashing for 2 weeks, and swore off any game that is single player but needs the internet. And Steam does not count, because it could go into offline mode without issues.

What's ridiculous is that CD-KEYs should be just fine. They take the invasive bullshit out of the way and as long as you can provide the key, you're fine. It worked for many years and there is no way that they can contend that modern DRM is any more effective than a CD-KEY.

online checks are more about stopping used sales and lending out your copy to a friend when you're done with it. It's about propping a crappy game's market price over a longer period of time by limiting or removing secondary market. Pointing and throwing a crybaby tantrum over pirates is just a convenient marketing spin.

I have no problem activating a game over the net, so it can bind to a system or something like steam that lets you install it wherever you want so long as you are logged into your account...and only 1 pc at a time can be logged in. I just hate things that force you to constantly be online to play a single player game. Why? Because my internet works 80% of the time, and it makes me mad when it or the DRM server goes down and I am left with something that I paid $50+ I can't play.

Also I am VERY worried about these games in 5 or so years, when I want to play them again. Sure they will work on steam, but will I have to by them again because Ubisoft or whoever removed then from their DRM server to save space? Like Deus Ex 3...I went back and played Deus Ex 1 and remembered why I was looking forward to 3.

Avatar image for elsolar
Elsolar

16

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Elsolar

Looks like pirates win again...

Avatar image for zitosilva
zitosilva

1897

Forum Posts

805

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

Edited By zitosilva

I think this is the first time I'm feeling how bad DRMs can be. I payed for Might and Magic Heros VI, fair and square. Even if this transition only takes a couple of hours, it seems unfair that I won't be able to play the game during this period.

Avatar image for legend
Legend

2735

Forum Posts

17405

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 28

Edited By Legend

Patrick just had to let everyone in the world know that his birthday is February 7. Now THIS is news.

Avatar image for wafflez
wafflez

583

Forum Posts

2441

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

Edited By wafflez

wow, I had no idea I share the same birthday with a bunch of you duders!  2/7ers do it better!

Avatar image for pauleku
pauleku

3

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By pauleku

And this, Ubisoft, is why people pirate games.

Avatar image for yukoasho
yukoasho

2247

Forum Posts

6076

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 7

Edited By yukoasho

@phrali said:

people still play ubisoft PC games?

wtf?

My thoughts exactly. I've only considered their games on consoles since their asinine DRM scheme started. You buy an Ubisoft PC game, you get what you deserve. That's what I think, anyway.

Avatar image for laugurinn
laugurinn

77

Forum Posts

40

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By laugurinn

UBISOFT YOU UBIMORONS

Avatar image for larannis
Larannis

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Larannis

This is why I continue to not buy anything this company makes console or PC. Yes I missed out on some great games but I refuse to give them any of my money and I also refuse to pirate stuff. Good DRM (like steam) works but the shit they do only punishes the people who buy thier games legaly.

Avatar image for gbrading
gbrading

3318

Forum Posts

10581

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 5

Edited By gbrading

I have been boycotting Ubisoft since they launched the Online Services Platform DRM, and I feel good about it. I might not have gotten to play any Assassin's Creed, but I don't care. So long as Ubisoft persist with this Orwellian DRM I refuse to give them my money. They dishonor the gaming industry with this continued farce.

Steam has proven that you can have DRM method that doesn't strangle your players at the same time. Ubisoft fail to understand this. P.S. Patrick's birthday' is 3 days before mine.

Avatar image for branthog
Branthog

5777

Forum Posts

1014

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Branthog

@DarkWaterSong said:

@tourgen said:

@Branthog said:

@DarkWaterSong said:

And this is why I will only buy games with DMR that can be used off-line. I had some nightmares trying to play Assassins Creed 2 with Time Warner's DNS server crashing for 2 weeks, and swore off any game that is single player but needs the internet. And Steam does not count, because it could go into offline mode without issues.

What's ridiculous is that CD-KEYs should be just fine. They take the invasive bullshit out of the way and as long as you can provide the key, you're fine. It worked for many years and there is no way that they can contend that modern DRM is any more effective than a CD-KEY.

online checks are more about stopping used sales and lending out your copy to a friend when you're done with it. It's about propping a crappy game's market price over a longer period of time by limiting or removing secondary market. Pointing and throwing a crybaby tantrum over pirates is just a convenient marketing spin.

I have no problem activating a game over the net, so it can bind to a system or something like steam that lets you install it wherever you want so long as you are logged into your account...and only 1 pc at a time can be logged in. I just hate things that force you to constantly be online to play a single player game. Why? Because my internet works 80% of the time, and it makes me mad when it or the DRM server goes down and I am left with something that I paid $50+ I can't play.

Also I am VERY worried about these games in 5 or so years, when I want to play them again. Sure they will work on steam, but will I have to by them again because Ubisoft or whoever removed then from their DRM server to save space? Like Deus Ex 3...I went back and played Deus Ex 1 and remembered why I was looking forward to 3.

The problem is that no DRM is acceptable, when the real reason is clearly as tourgen also mentioned and not "piracy". It's further not acceptable when, as is always pointed out in these discussions, only legitimate customers are impacted by this. So, it accomplishes nothing and only hurts their actual customers. There is no rational and acceptable justification for doing it, as a result. Even if they used an entirely reasonable DRM (and no matter what kind of DRM you use, I am of the opinion that it should dissolve itself after a couple or so years, after the money generation portion of the title's life has come and gone).

Avatar image for deactivated-64b8656eaf424
deactivated-64b8656eaf424

1450

Forum Posts

12205

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

I guess this is news...

Avatar image for jedted
Jedted

2970

Forum Posts

1307

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 17

Edited By Jedted

This sucks for all the Settlers fans(and those still playing AC1 on Mac i geuss).

Happy Birthday Patrick!

Avatar image for rolyatkcinmai
Rolyatkcinmai

2763

Forum Posts

16308

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Rolyatkcinmai

GRRR I CAN'T GO A DAY WITHOUT THE GAMES I WASN'T GOING TO PLAY ON THAT DAY ANYWAY

Avatar image for jackg100
JackG100

435

Forum Posts

321

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By JackG100

I was going to buy Silent Hunter V, then I saw Ubisoft...

Avatar image for jeaz
Jeaz

65

Forum Posts

25

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Jeaz

Ehm, there's no Mac version of the first Assassin's Creed game.

Avatar image for kanerobot
KaneRobot

2802

Forum Posts

2656

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 9

Edited By KaneRobot

@Rolyatkcinmai said:

GRRR I CAN'T GO A DAY WITHOUT THE GAMES I WASN'T GOING TO PLAY ON THAT DAY ANYWAY

It doesn't matter if they were or were not going to play the games on that day. They can't play the games they purchased, and that's a problem.

That's why this digital distribution future we're headed for is fucking bullshit, I don't care whether it's Steam, XBL, Origin, whatever. We no longer own our games, just a license to play them.

Avatar image for sumdumgai17
sumdumgai17

5

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By sumdumgai17

Happy birthday in advance, Patrick!

Avatar image for inappropriate_touchscreen
inappropriate_touchscreen

113

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Well, if you think of those games as 'Online Games', which they somewhat are, with the DRM, then it's perfectly normal to have some server downtime.

Avatar image for mandude
mandude

2835

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By mandude

@inappropriate_touchscreen: Quite a few of them aren't. Granted, some of them are pretty old.

Avatar image for eyz
Eyz

469

Forum Posts

44

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By Eyz

See, stuff like this is why DRM is so stupid.

The other day I found some ol' PC games in a store. Bought them, could play them afterwards easily. (besides 1 of these 7 titles I bought, 1 I needed to find some fan-launcher to play it under Windows 7)

Can you imagine that with DRM-enabled Games? Nope! In 5-10 years, you can just as simply throw them by the window. (or find some cracks online...which in the end would be better to find a pirate copy of the game to begin with...)

Avatar image for kete
Kete

55

Forum Posts

496

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Kete

I just discovered i share a birthday with patrick.

Avatar image for ultimaxe
UltimAXE

887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By UltimAXE

I like the part where people who paid money are inconvenienced while the pirates are (conceivably) able to play their games.

Ubisoft keepin' it real.

Avatar image for bitteralmond
BitterAlmond

422

Forum Posts

21

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By BitterAlmond

@UltimAXE said:

I like the part where people who paid money are inconvenienced while the pirates are (conceivably) able to play their games.

Ubisoft keepin' it real.

And this is why I pick up no-cd, no-DRM cracks for the games that I purchase legally. If I pay for it, I can modify it how I want, including removing the ridiculous locks.