Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    BioShock Infinite

    Game » consists of 20 releases. Released Mar 26, 2013

    The third game in the BioShock series leaves the bottom of the sea behind for an entirely new setting - the floating city of Columbia, circa 1912. Come to retrieve a girl named Elizabeth, ex-detective Booker DeWitt finds more in store for him there than he could ever imagine.

    Questions About Infinite's Ending

    Avatar image for jduster
    jduster

    41

    Forum Posts

    44

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 3

    For those who know it better than I do:

    1. Isn't it biased. In an infinite set of universes, there could be so many different splits, but this plot focuses on only 1 (the baptism). How come all the other possibilities of varying decisions were never an issue.

    2. Anyone contesting that the ending IS logically possible?

    Avatar image for deactivated-60481185a779c
    deactivated-60481185a779c

    1296

    Forum Posts

    21

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    The baptism is pivotal. Without it there is no Comstock.

    Avatar image for the_laughing_man
    The_Laughing_Man

    13807

    Forum Posts

    7460

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    @jduster said:

    For those who know it better than I do:

    1. Isn't it biased. In an infinite set of universes, there could be so many different splits, but this plot focuses on only 1 (the baptism). How come all the other possibilities of varying decisions were never an issue.

    2. Anyone contesting that the ending IS logically possible?

    The Baptism is what makes Booker or Comstock. And those are the only two realities that where visited.

    And what do you mean by contesting the ending?

    Avatar image for jazgalaxy
    JazGalaxy

    1638

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    @dgtlty said:

    The baptism is pivotal. Without it there is no Comstock.

    Except that makes no sense.

    I'm one of the people who thinks the ending just *is* and doesn't merit dissecting at the level people are dissecting it, but to say that the baptism is the "pivotal" point in a game literally about infinity is an oxymoron.

    And that's not even taking into account the fact that Elizabeth doesn't drown booker at his baptism. If elizabeth were to take booker back to the point of his baptism, he would be looking at it like The Ghost of Christmas Past taking Scrooge back to see his earlier self in his school days. Instead she takes him to a place where he, in first person, is being baptised again. He IS, inexplicably, the booker of the past. And when Elizabeth takes him back to that moment to drown him, the crowd and the preacher are not there. So, clearly, it's not the SAME moment. And she drowns a booker who has full knowledge of the entire adventure he went on with Elizabeth and who knew the horror of who Comstock would become. So why not just leave a fully aware booker alone? Because she saw that even with that knowledge he still could never be a good man?

    Avatar image for ripelivejam
    ripelivejam

    13572

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #5  Edited By ripelivejam

    play bioshock 2, as it's the exact same story in every single way. :)

    Avatar image for musubi
    musubi

    17524

    Forum Posts

    5650

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 8

    User Lists: 17

    @jduster said:

    For those who know it better than I do:

    1. Isn't it biased. In an infinite set of universes, there could be so many different splits, but this plot focuses on only 1 (the baptism). How come all the other possibilities of varying decisions were never an issue.

    2. Anyone contesting that the ending IS logically possible?

    It focuses on Booker from the 123rd "cycle" some very specific things happened in THIS cycle that made it special the first being that Lutece specifically pulled THIS booker into the time line and secondly Booker gets drowned effectively breaking the cycle. Secondly, don't try to apply logic to this.

    Avatar image for jazgalaxy
    JazGalaxy

    1638

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    #7  Edited By JazGalaxy

    @jduster said:

    For those who know it better than I do:

    1. Isn't it biased. In an infinite set of universes, there could be so many different splits, but this plot focuses on only 1 (the baptism). How come all the other possibilities of varying decisions were never an issue.

    2. Anyone contesting that the ending IS logically possible?

    It focuses on Booker from the 123rd "cycle" some very specific things happened in THIS cycle that made it special the first being that Lutece specifically pulled THIS booker into the time line and secondly Booker gets drowned effectively breaking the cycle. Secondly, don't try to apply logic to this.

    If people are right and the "respawn" sequence is a random booker being pulled from a random reality and having his consciousness merged with the booker you were just playing, the "123rd Booker" concept is irrelevant.

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.