Day one!
Costume Quest
Game » consists of 7 releases. Released Oct 20, 2010
A downloadable turn-based RPG by Double Fine. Play as a child on Halloween night in search of your twin sibling.
Costume Quest 'Grubbins on Ice' DLC Hitting This December
I expect the hilarious dialog will point this out rather than skirting the issue. And thankfully, it should be readable this time!" Trick or Treating during the winter with costumes on? Right on. Makes ZERO sense but...right on! "
The original game was an unexpected treat for me. I only learned it existed days before release from TimOfLegend's Twitter feed. Despite his and DoubleFine's excellent track record, I didn't see this coming. I bought it as soon as the demo ended and completed it in a night. (Hello, 4:00 AM!) This expansion will be an instant purchase.
Actually, yeah, now that you mention that I'm 110% on board :)I expect the hilarious dialog will point this out rather than skirting the issue.
@NobleJon said:
I bought it as soon as the demo ended and completed it in a night.DeathSpank is the only game I ever bought as soon as the demo asked me to.
Costume Quest was the only game I ever bought without even bothering to download the demo.
Fuck yeah I want more. Played the whole thing in one sitting - not because it was short, but because I loved it to death.
I spot a Bobbing For Apples area
Which likely means there isn't any new gameplay in this. It's just the same stuff as the regular game, which already rehashed its gameplay concepts a little too frequently.
Pass.
More Costume Quest is great! Can't wait to try it out.
@nintendoeats said:
" Why does this game need DLC? It was awesome as a standalone product. Its official. I hate DLC. "If the game is great, why would you not want more?
" @HomemadeZiggurat: no... citing sources is necessary to prevent getting sued. "I thought it was weird seeing "Gamespot" on the article's picture. This isn't the first time its happened, a GS video was embedded for the new Ace Combat game, and it was weird then.
@S0ndor said:
" @HomemadeZiggurat: no... citing sources is necessary to prevent getting sued. "
Actually no. Citing sources is for our benefit, so that we can make an informed decision about how to perceive it. News outlets are not legally bound to report accurate or factual news, and therefore are not legally bound to cite sources. Obviously if they actually ripped off the article that would be copyright, but Gamespot cannot OWN information about a game.
" More Costume Quest is great! Can't wait to try it out.Because I've played it now, and knowing that there is more being produced reduces my feeling of satisfaction at having "completed" Costume Quest. I felt that it lasted exactly as long as it should have. If it was a third longer I wouldn't have liked that. Now I'm being expected to dish out more money and dedicate more time to being "up"on my costume quest.
@nintendoeats said:" Why does this game need DLC? It was awesome as a standalone product. Its official. I hate DLC. "If the game is great, why would you not want more? "
This isn't as bad a Shadowbroker, which actually contained something which I had been expecting as part of ME3, but its still annoying as all hell.
" @sociald1077 said:People get annoyed over really odd stuff to me. Either you want to play more of it and buy the DLC or you don't. Feeling like you HAVE to buy it for some reason is odd to me." More Costume Quest is great! Can't wait to try it out.Because I've played it now, and knowing that there is more being produced reduces my feeling of satisfaction at having "completed" Costume Quest. I felt that it lasted exactly as long as it should have. If it was a third longer I wouldn't have liked that. Now I'm being expected to dish out more money and dedicate more time to being "up"on my costume quest. This isn't as bad a Shadowbroker, which actually contained something which I had been expecting as part of ME3, but its still annoying as all hell. "
@nintendoeats said:" Why does this game need DLC? It was awesome as a standalone product. Its official. I hate DLC. "If the game is great, why would you not want more? "
Let me put this another way. When you buy a game, you don't just expect to spend 6 hours or however much time playing the game. You also expect to spend the rest of your life being impacted by that experience in some way (which may be significant or subtle). Having a sequel come out impacts that residual experience, because your memories of the first game are going to be coloured by the second. That goes even more for DLC, which doesn't even pretend to be a seperate entity." @nintendoeats said:
" @sociald1077 said:People get annoyed over really odd stuff to me. Either you want to play more of it and buy the DLC or you don't. Feeling like you HAVE to buy it for some reason is odd to me. "" More Costume Quest is great! Can't wait to try it out.Because I've played it now, and knowing that there is more being produced reduces my feeling of satisfaction at having "completed" Costume Quest. I felt that it lasted exactly as long as it should have. If it was a third longer I wouldn't have liked that. Now I'm being expected to dish out more money and dedicate more time to being "up"on my costume quest. This isn't as bad a Shadowbroker, which actually contained something which I had been expecting as part of ME3, but its still annoying as all hell. "
@nintendoeats said:" Why does this game need DLC? It was awesome as a standalone product. Its official. I hate DLC. "If the game is great, why would you not want more? "
Now imagine that you don't play the sequel or DLC, but know that it exists. In both cases, but especially the latter, there is going to be a sense of incompleteness atatched to your memories of the game, because you know that there has been more added to the experience that you haven't seen.
Costume Quest was a complete experience (a light-hearted one to be sure, but an experience). Adding more to it is not likely to improve somebodies memories of the game, so DLC is not a good idea for it.
To put this in more broad terms, I don't think that anybody would be very happy if the director of Downfall started working on Downfall 2: Richard Nixon. It might be great and deep and intense, but it would still be unnecessary and make the whole thing smell badly of capitalism.
EDIT: To put it yet another way: Star Wars prequels.
As far as the whole completeness thing goes, I get that some people are real completionists and feel that have to do everything/get everything/etc, I'm just not one of those people. So, I just don't feel that I haven't completed a game or series just because DLC comes out. I play what games and DLC I want and don't play the ones I don't want. Basically, I guess it's that if DLC comes out for something I care enough about that I would feel incomplete by not playing it(like with Mass Effect 2), then I buy and play the DLC. If the DLC is for a game that I don't care enough about to actually buy the DLC, then I couldn't care less. I don't buy DLC to feel like I had a complete experience of some game, I buy DLC when I really enjoy the game and want to play more of it. I don't really look at it any differently than buying a sequel to a game or an expansion for a PC game.
Though I would say that you may somewhat underestimate the power of things to stay with you. I might be a little hyper-aware of this, especially considering that my life pretty much consists of school, food, sleep and games, but in my experience it is a generally true thing.
@nintendoeats: I don't think I'd be happy with GB if they hadn't linked the source. Even Kotaku links their source and they're shit. And I never said linking something from GS was wrong, just odd.
" @nintendoeats: I think I love you. "I think that's going to need some qualification...
But thankyou :)
I am shocked and excited about this. I didn't think they would add any content for costume quest but like @louiedog: said If it's 400 points I'll pick it up no more then that.
@S0ndor said:Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought Gamespot had exclusive publishing rights. Hence the word "exclusive". Though I guess that word is used very liberally these days, so I dunno." @HomemadeZiggurat: no... citing sources is necessary to prevent getting sued. "Actually no. Citing sources is for our benefit, so that we can make an informed decision about how to perceive it. News outlets are not legally bound to report accurate or factual news, and therefore are not legally bound to cite sources. Obviously if they actually ripped off the article that would be copyright, but Gamespot cannot OWN information about a game. "
Promoting? He's just naming his source, that's been common for news since the 18th century. "@S0ndor said:
Citing sources is not the same as promotion. "I just noticed that this time, rather than citing the source at the end of the article (eg, just saying via gamespot), he actually says 'I suggest you go look at Gamespot's article for the full scoop'. Its a slight difference like that which would suggest promotion, but hey, Brad probably didn't mean anything by it.
Weird, I loved this game but I'm done with it. It was only so great because it came out around Halloween, trick or treating on Christmas? Meh. Also I'm totally sick of the combat, so no thanks for me.
" @nintendoeats said:Again, Gamespot can't own information. If they could, than everybody posting in this topic would be a dirty filthy pirate, because we are spreading the story as well. All Gamespot can do is get an exclusive interview or statement from Double Fine, giving them first (and the most complete) access to the story.@S0ndor said:Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought Gamespot had exclusive publishing rights. Hence the word "exclusive". Though I guess that word is used very liberally these days, so I dunno. "" @HomemadeZiggurat: no... citing sources is necessary to prevent getting sued. "Actually no. Citing sources is for our benefit, so that we can make an informed decision about how to perceive it. News outlets are not legally bound to report accurate or factual news, and therefore are not legally bound to cite sources. Obviously if they actually ripped off the article that would be copyright, but Gamespot cannot OWN information about a game. "
I wish they would of come up with a new concept for the battles. Trick or treating at Christmas time is in no way appealing to me. Maybe they could of done some kind of door to door Christmas caroling thing, now that would be season appropriate!
Please Log In to post.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment