Dragon Age: Origins
Game » consists of 20 releases. Released Nov 03, 2009
Dragon Age: Origins is an epic fantasy role-playing game featuring a rich story, personality-driven characters, and tactical, bloody combat. It is considered a spiritual successor to the Baldur's Gate series.
Advertisements
^ What is the purpose of putting this after reviews (example: DAO & Halo 3 ODST)?
Do they really need a disclosure statement like this?
I thought these reviews were not influenced by game developers/publishers....especially after the drama surrounding Gerstmann's Gate. If this is true and they are not being influenced when creating these reviews then what is the purpose behind this disclosure statement?
This just does not make alot of sense to me, for example, I trust Giant Bomb game reviews 100% but I can see how some readers may see that disclaimer and get the wrong vibe and think this GB review score was influenced by the money they obtained from the game's producer/publisher for ads.
Other game website reviews that I have read were on games they are advertising on their site but they did not put a disclaimer on the review. I'm just wondering why they (GB) chose to do this.
Do you think all game websites should follow suit and include this type of disclaimer? Or do you think it is pointless and should be done away with? What are your thoughts?
It's not rocket science.
Do they really need a disclosure statement like this?
@torus said:
" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_disclosure_(journalism) It's not rocket science. "
Listen here rocket scientist, you totally did not answer the question. Since you are the rocket scientist can you please give a better answer than posting a link to a full disclosure media wiki.
"Or you could actually click on the link.
Do they really need a disclosure statement like this?
@torus said:Listen here rocket scientist, you totally did not answer the question. Since you are the rocket scientist can you please give a better answer than posting a link to a full disclosure media wiki. "" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_disclosure_(journalism) It's not rocket science. "
" @THE_END said:but wouldn't that be the smart thing?"Or you could actually click on the link. "
Do they really need a disclosure statement like this?
@torus said:Listen here rocket scientist, you totally did not answer the question. Since you are the rocket scientist can you please give a better answer than posting a link to a full disclosure media wiki. "" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_disclosure_(journalism) It's not rocket science. "
I did click on the link and read this: " Full disclosure in media refers to disclosing the interests of the writer which may bear on the subject being written about, for example, if the writer has worked with an interview subject in the past."" @THE_END said:
"Or you could actually click on the link. "
Do they really need a disclosure statement like this?
@torus said:Listen here rocket scientist, you totally did not answer the question. Since you are the rocket scientist can you please give a better answer than posting a link to a full disclosure media wiki. "" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_disclosure_(journalism) It's not rocket science. "
This does not answer of my questions presented.
" @natetodamax said:Yes it does.I did click on the link and read this: " Full disclosure in media refers to disclosing the interests of the writer which may bear on the subject being written about, for example, if the writer has worked with an interview subject in the past." This does not answer of my questions presented. "" @THE_END said:
"Or you could actually click on the link. "
Do they really need a disclosure statement like this?
@torus said:Listen here rocket scientist, you totally did not answer the question. Since you are the rocket scientist can you please give a better answer than posting a link to a full disclosure media wiki. "" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_disclosure_(journalism) It's not rocket science. "
It's called journalistic integrity sir, disclose that you are receiving advertising dollars from the company responsible for the product you are making qualitative statements about. A 5-star review for a game is a much worse example of this than if this was for, say, a game that ended up getting a 2-star score, as it is important to note this to say "The advertising dollars we received had no baring on my score for the game". As Torus said, it's not rocket science.
" @THE_END said:No it does not." @natetodamax said:Yes it does. "I did click on the link and read this: " Full disclosure in media refers to disclosing the interests of the writer which may bear on the subject being written about, for example, if the writer has worked with an interview subject in the past." This does not answer of my questions presented. "" @THE_END said:
"Or you could actually click on the link. "
Do they really need a disclosure statement like this?
@torus said:Listen here rocket scientist, you totally did not answer the question. Since you are the rocket scientist can you please give a better answer than posting a link to a full disclosure media wiki. "" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_disclosure_(journalism) It's not rocket science. "
" Disclosure: The game featured in this review is or was an advertised product on giantbomb.com. ^ What is the purpose of putting this after reviews (example: DAO & Halo 3 ODST)? Do they really need a disclosure statement like this? I thought these reviews were not influenced by game developers/publishers....especially after the drama surrounding Gerstmann's Gate. If this is true and they are not being influenced when creating these reviews then what is the purpose behind this disclosure statement? "They are saying that if you don't trust the legitimacy of this site or of the person reviewing the game due to an exchange of money, to go check out another review from somewhere else.
" @CL60 said:" @THE_END said:No it does not. "" @natetodamax said:Yes it does. "I did click on the link and read this: " Full disclosure in media refers to disclosing the interests of the writer which may bear on the subject being written about, for example, if the writer has worked with an interview subject in the past." This does not answer of my questions presented. "" @THE_END said:
"Or you could actually click on the link. "
Do they really need a disclosure statement like this?
@torus said:Listen here rocket scientist, you totally did not answer the question. Since you are the rocket scientist can you please give a better answer than posting a link to a full disclosure media wiki. "" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_disclosure_(journalism) It's not rocket science. "
dude...yes it does
" @jessej07 said: That is the best first post ever :D "Exactly my thoughts. That statement didn't match your icon.
" @THE_END said:yes it does, also don't be pissed your topic (which you tought would spark some gargantuan disscussion) didn't do better then a wiki link" @CL60 said:dude...yes it does "" @THE_END said:No it does not. "" @natetodamax said:Yes it does. "I did click on the link and read this: " Full disclosure in media refers to disclosing the interests of the writer which may bear on the subject being written about, for example, if the writer has worked with an interview subject in the past." This does not answer of my questions presented. "" @THE_END said:
"Or you could actually click on the link. "
Do they really need a disclosure statement like this?
@torus said:Listen here rocket scientist, you totally did not answer the question. Since you are the rocket scientist can you please give a better answer than posting a link to a full disclosure media wiki. "" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_disclosure_(journalism) It's not rocket science. "
If the writer feels that he/she needs to mention it, they should. It is the writer's choice/site's policy. There is nothing wrong with it.
" @THE_END said:
They are saying that if you don't trust the legitimacy of this site or of the person reviewing the game due to an exchange of money, to go check out another review from somewhere else. "" Disclosure: The game featured in this review is or was an advertised product on giantbomb.com. ^ What is the purpose of putting this after reviews (example: DAO & Halo 3 ODST)? Do they really need a disclosure statement like this? I thought these reviews were not influenced by game developers/publishers....especially after the drama surrounding Gerstmann's Gate. If this is true and they are not being influenced when creating these reviews then what is the purpose behind this disclosure statement? "
Thanks for not being a jerk like almost everyone else posting here.
This just does not make alot of sense to me, for example, I trust Giant Bomb game reviews 100% but I can see how some readers may see that disclaimer and get the wrong vibe and think this GB review score was influenced by the money they obtained from the game's producer/publisher for ads.
Other game website reviews that I have read were on games they are advertising on their site but they did not put a disclaimer on the review. I'm just wondering why they (GB) chose to do this.
Do you think all game websites should follow suit and include this type of disclaimer? Or do you think it is pointless and should be done away with? What are your thoughts?
That's the idea. They're trying to be more ethical about it. You can't just say 'Rockstar's ad money didn't influence this article', because people would think they're lying (I would). Keep it truthful and neutral, so that the readers make the choice. Sure, some readers may have read the disclaimer and thought there was some funny business, that's their choice to think. It's Ryan's responsibility in the review, then, to prove to the reader that he wasn't influenced by ad money by being objective, neutral, etc.
Showing the disclaimer makes writing a review more difficult but more ethical, and that's why I love GB's reviews. Reviews with a rich pie filling and flaky ethics crust.
No it does not." @21stCenturyJesus said:
yes it does, also don't be pissed your topic (which you tought would spark some gargantuan disscussion) didn't do better then a wiki link "" @THE_END said:
" @CL60 said:dude...yes it does "" @THE_END said:No it does not. "" @natetodamax said:Yes it does. "I did click on the link and read this: " Full disclosure in media refers to disclosing the interests of the writer which may bear on the subject being written about, for example, if the writer has worked with an interview subject in the past." This does not answer of my questions presented. "" @THE_END said:
"Or you could actually click on the link. "
Do they really need a disclosure statement like this?@torus
said:Listen here rocket scientist, you totally did not answer the question. Since you are the rocket scientist can you please give a better answer than posting a link to a full disclosure media wiki. "" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_disclosure_(journalism) It's not rocket science. "
Also, I did not tought my topic would spark some gargantuan disscussion.
To clarify so that when the hoard of gamers comes after them claiming they're biased they can tell them to suck it.
" Disclosure: The game featured in this review is or was an advertised product on giantbomb.com. ^ What is the purpose of putting this after reviews (example: DAO & Halo 3 ODST)? Do they really need a disclosure statement like this? I thought these reviews were not influenced by game developers/publishers....especially after the drama surrounding Gerstmann's Gate. If this is true and they are not being influenced when creating these reviews then what is the purpose behind this disclosure statement? This just does not make alot of sense to me, for example, I trust Giant Bomb game reviews 100% but I can see how some readers may see that disclaimer and get the wrong vibe and think this GB review score was influenced by the money they obtained from the game's producer/publisher for ads. Other game website reviews that I have read were on games they are advertising on their site but they did not put a disclaimer on the review. I'm just wondering why they (GB) chose to do this. Do you think all game websites should follow suit and include this type of disclaimer? Or do you think it is pointless and should be done away with? What are your thoughts? "It has to do with what happened to Jeff when he worked for Gamespot. He gave a poor review to Kane and Lynch which was a game advertised on the site. The producer of Kane and Lynch (the name of the company escapes me) tried to get Jeff fired, if I'm not mistaken. Now I don't know if Jeff did get fired or if he left, but from what I read Jeff just wanted to create a website that did not fall into the trap of corporate greed. Thats one reason why they have the disclosure, to show that they honorable sources of information revolving the gaming industry.
Please Log In to post.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment