Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    Fallout: New Vegas

    Game » consists of 25 releases. Released Oct 19, 2010

    The post-apocalyptic Fallout universe expands into Nevada in this new title in the franchise. As a courier once left for dead by a mysterious man in a striped suit, the player must now set out to find their assailant and uncover the secrets of the enigmatic ruler of New Vegas.

    Fallout universe

    Avatar image for twolines
    TwoLines

    3406

    Forum Posts

    319

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #1  Edited By TwoLines

    I was just curious, does anyone else think that Fallout universe is pretty damn weird?
    I mean, everything looks like the world got stuck in the 50/60's, but the bombs went off in 2077 or something like that.  

    So, was the world stuck in one era for 100 years? No new songs (songs from the 50's/60's on the radio)? And some of the tech looks out of place... 
    I mean, they have advanced power armor and strength/percepcion implants and robots, but look at the tv's in that world! 
    Am I suppose to just... take that in as it is? Suspension of disbelief and all that?  

    I know they were trying to create a world that looked like all of those "The World of The Future Today!" type exhibitions from the 50's and whatnot. 
    But it is kind of ridiculous, isn't it?

    Avatar image for sooperspy
    Sooperspy

    6485

    Forum Posts

    935

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 9

    User Lists: 17

    #2  Edited By Sooperspy

    I was always wondering about the Fallout universe. It is weird.

    Avatar image for inkerman
    inkerman

    1521

    Forum Posts

    1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 2

    #3  Edited By inkerman

    Admittedly still playing songs from the 50s was weird (perhaps modern disks and the like did not survive the radiation meaning Three Dog and other have to play old vinyls?). The reason the tech is fucked is because in the Fallout universe, miniaturisation of electronics did not happen.

    Avatar image for aishan
    Aishan

    1074

    Forum Posts

    5220

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #4  Edited By Aishan

    It's ridiculous, yes, but it's where a lot of the charm comes from.  Every aspect of the Fallout mythos is derived from the early Sci-Fi of the 1950s, primarily the idea of nuclear-power being the be-all-and-end-all of technology with it powering everything from childrens' toys to automobiles. The universe is pulp Sci-Fi through and through and they stick to that through thick and thin. 
     
    And yes, in the Fallout universe, America never moved on culturally from the 1950s and never developed the microprocessor; hence all the artwork, the design of the Energy Weapons and robots, the giant computer terminals, and most notably the constant Red Scare (only this time against the Chinese instead of the Russians.)

    Avatar image for dingofighter
    Dingofighter

    1888

    Forum Posts

    251

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #5  Edited By Dingofighter

    I think the reason behind the 50's aesthetic is that there was a war that practically "froze" the US in the culture of the 50's, or something along those lines. 
     
    That meant that the technology they developed was more focused on fusion and things like that, instead of electronics like in our universe. 
    Therefore they didn't invent smaller electronic components, and therefore still have those wierd TV's. 
     
    So the split from our universe happened in the 50's, and after that the Fallout universe kept evolving along the 50's vision of the future until the Apocalypse happened in 2077.  

    Well, it went something like that, I don't remember exactly...

    Avatar image for vidiot
    vidiot

    2891

    Forum Posts

    397

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 1

    #6  Edited By vidiot

    The reason with the 50's "WORLD OF TOMORROW" aesthetic is very deliberate. The earliest public propaganda/information regarding nuclear weapons obviously was disseminated in American culture during the 50's. The Leave-it-to-Beaver attitude (Example: Vault Boy), regarding nuclear weapons is a deliberate satirical take on the gravity of the idea of nuclear war. (Where as in the 50's it was regarded as something less naive as we perceive it today.) 
     
    It should also be noted that the Fallout world is drastically different from out own. If you are on-top of your Fallout lore you know that between 1945 and the 1960's, the U.S. is apparently broken-up into commonwealths. The Soviet Union is still around untill 2077 too.  
    Oh, and we annex Canada in 2072... Sorry Canada.

    Avatar image for haggis
    haggis

    1674

    Forum Posts

    4

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 1

    #7  Edited By haggis

    As far as alt-history sci-fi goes, the Fallout world may be a bit tongue-in-cheek, but it's hardly all that strange.

    Avatar image for joey_ravn
    JoeyRavn

    5290

    Forum Posts

    792

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 3

    #8  Edited By JoeyRavn

    It's retro-futurism, the projection of futuristic elements into a past setting. And it's not weird at all. Remember The Flintstones? Yeah, that.

    Avatar image for ragdrazi
    Ragdrazi

    2258

    Forum Posts

    1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #9  Edited By Ragdrazi

    It's a "retro-future." Everything that the 50's thought would be in the future is there... Including nuclear war. I think it's a great setting.

    Avatar image for twolines
    TwoLines

    3406

    Forum Posts

    319

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #10  Edited By TwoLines
    @MaFoLu said:
    I think the reason behind the 50's aesthetic is that there was a war that practically "froze" the US in the culture of the 50's, or something along those lines.  That meant that the technology they developed was more focused on fusion and things like that, instead of electronics like in our universe. Therefore they didn't invent smaller electronic components, and therefore still have those wierd TV's.  So the split from our universe happened in the 50's, and after that the Fallout universe kept evolving along the 50's vision of the future until the Apocalypse happened in 2077.  Well, it went something like that, I don't remember exactly...
    Ohh, okay. So at least they're justifying it somehow. Cool. 
    I don't like loose threads in the mythos, so I'm glad they sewn that back in.   

    That's how I feel with some vidja game worlds, It doesn't even have to make sense, but they have to explain it, even if they explain it by using more crazy gibberish.
    Avatar image for oraknabo
    oraknabo

    1744

    Forum Posts

    12

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 6

    #11  Edited By oraknabo

    I think it makes more sense if you think of it as the future as imagined by someone in the 50s. The confusion comes in when you see it in the context of having been created 40 years after that.

    Avatar image for eroticfishcake
    eroticfishcake

    7856

    Forum Posts

    7820

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 6

    #12  Edited By eroticfishcake
    @TwoLines: Even though just about everyone here answered your question, I think this short interview by Tim Cain (one of the designers for the original Fallouts) will help shed some light. He gives a small explanation in there somewhere. Also, it comes in two parts. Well worth a listen if you're a big fan of the series.
    Avatar image for joey_ravn
    JoeyRavn

    5290

    Forum Posts

    792

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 3

    #13  Edited By JoeyRavn

    @TwoLines said:

    Ohh, okay. So at least they're justifying it somehow. Cool. I don't like loose threads in the mythos, so I'm glad they sewn that back in.

    Something makes me think you have not played Fallout and Fallout 2. The franchise does not start with Fallout 3, as amazing as it may sound.

    Avatar image for nickl
    NickL

    2276

    Forum Posts

    695

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #14  Edited By NickL

    @JoeyRavn said:

    @TwoLines said:

    Ohh, okay. So at least they're justifying it somehow. Cool. I don't like loose threads in the mythos, so I'm glad they sewn that back in.

    Something makes me think you have not played Fallout and Fallout 2. The franchise does not start with Fallout 3, as amazing as it may sound.

    I played a ton of both (probably a minimum of 100 hours each) and never beat either. I was pretty young when they came out so the later parts where impossibly hard and I didn't really care about any of the story. Just because someone played those games doesn't mean they know the deep fiction from them and I'm sure a lot of people are in the same boat as me.

    Also, I hate to say it because I loved those games, but time has not served them well and they are all but impossible to go back to now for the story.

    Avatar image for thedudeofgaming
    TheDudeOfGaming

    6115

    Forum Posts

    47173

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 6

    User Lists: 1

    #15  Edited By TheDudeOfGaming

    It's a retro-futuristic game that has an alternate timeline that drifts apart from ours at one point. Imagine if the 50's-60's America was set in 2077, that's basically it.

    Avatar image for twolines
    TwoLines

    3406

    Forum Posts

    319

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #16  Edited By TwoLines
    @JoeyRavn said:

    @TwoLines said:

    Ohh, okay. So at least they're justifying it somehow. Cool. I don't like loose threads in the mythos, so I'm glad they sewn that back in.

    Something makes me think you have not played Fallout and Fallout 2. The franchise does not start with Fallout 3, as amazing as it may sound.

    Played all of them a couple of times. Was a bit confused by this, but never really questioned it. Slow down on the ellitist-o-meter though.
     
    @eroticfishcake said:
    @TwoLines: Even though just about everyone here answered your question, I think this short interview by Tim Cain (one of the designers for the original Fallouts) will help shed some light. He gives a small explanation in there somewhere. Also, it comes in two parts. Well worth a listen if you're a big fan of the series.
    Ooh! Thanks, I'll check it out.
    Avatar image for deactivated-6058f06e73ee8
    deactivated-6058f06e73ee8

    1024

    Forum Posts

    75

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    @TwoLines said:

    I was just curious, does anyone else think that Fallout universe is pretty damn weird?I mean, everything looks like the world got stuck in the 50/60's, but the bombs went off in 2077 or something like that. So, was the world stuck in one era for 100 years? No new songs (songs from the 50's/60's on the radio)? And some of the tech looks out of place... I mean, they have advanced power armor and strength/percepcion implants and robots, but look at the tv's in that world! Am I suppose to just... take that in as it is? Suspension of disbelief and all that? I know they were trying to create a world that looked like all of those "The World of The Future Today!" type exhibitions from the 50's and whatnot. But it is kind of ridiculous, isn't it?

    You're the guy that's the cause of all those books and websites trying to figure out how phasers and lightsabers work aren't you. Quit it.

    Avatar image for twolines
    TwoLines

    3406

    Forum Posts

    319

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #18  Edited By TwoLines
    @NeverDave said:

    @TwoLines said:

    I was just curious, does anyone else think that Fallout universe is pretty damn weird?I mean, everything looks like the world got stuck in the 50/60's, but the bombs went off in 2077 or something like that. So, was the world stuck in one era for 100 years? No new songs (songs from the 50's/60's on the radio)? And some of the tech looks out of place... I mean, they have advanced power armor and strength/percepcion implants and robots, but look at the tv's in that world! Am I suppose to just... take that in as it is? Suspension of disbelief and all that? I know they were trying to create a world that looked like all of those "The World of The Future Today!" type exhibitions from the 50's and whatnot. But it is kind of ridiculous, isn't it?

    You're the guy that's the cause of all those books and websites trying to figure out how phasers and lightsabers work aren't you. Quit it.

    Nah, that's like the fourth level of crazy, I'm... let's say one-ish.  
    ...
    Okay, maybe around two.
    Avatar image for deactivated-6058f06e73ee8
    deactivated-6058f06e73ee8

    1024

    Forum Posts

    75

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    @TwoLines said:

    @NeverDave said:

    @TwoLines said:

    I was just curious, does anyone else think that Fallout universe is pretty damn weird?I mean, everything looks like the world got stuck in the 50/60's, but the bombs went off in 2077 or something like that. So, was the world stuck in one era for 100 years? No new songs (songs from the 50's/60's on the radio)? And some of the tech looks out of place... I mean, they have advanced power armor and strength/percepcion implants and robots, but look at the tv's in that world! Am I suppose to just... take that in as it is? Suspension of disbelief and all that? I know they were trying to create a world that looked like all of those "The World of The Future Today!" type exhibitions from the 50's and whatnot. But it is kind of ridiculous, isn't it?

    You're the guy that's the cause of all those books and websites trying to figure out how phasers and lightsabers work aren't you. Quit it.

    Nah, that's like the fourth level of crazy, I'm... let's say one-ish. ...Okay, maybe around two.

    You know what explanations bring, man? Midichlorians.

    Avatar image for jaqen_hghar
    jaqen_hghar

    1448

    Forum Posts

    3292

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 26

    #20  Edited By jaqen_hghar

    I have always loved the Fallout universe. So much that after beating the two first games at least four times each, I managed to dig up the Fallout Bible. I read all of it. And now I want to read it again, as I am playing New Vegas myself at the time.

    Sure, things are pretty weird in that universe, but all of it makes sense.

    Avatar image for fjordson
    fjordson

    2571

    Forum Posts

    430

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 6

    #21  Edited By fjordson

    Honestly, the Fallout universe is one of my favourites in gaming. Just so many interesting places, people, events, etc. that have happened throughout the series. And I love the whole "future-retro" idea combined with the post-apocalyptic wasteland. 
     
    Read up a bit on the Fallout wiki (http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Fallout_Wiki). Tons of good articles on the backstory of the Fallout universe and why the world is the way it is (and was before the Great War). Basically, it's the future as paranoid Americans in the 1950's envisioned it would be like. Little green aliens, laser rifles and energy pistols, nuclear war, evil communists, futuristic cars, etc. It's pretty cool, imo.  
     
    Like others have said, after WWII, the world as we know it in our universe no longer existed (the United States was divided into 13 commonwealths, among other things that diverge from the history of our own world). 
     
    Time and technology marched on past 1950's/early 60's America, but general culture, entertainment and ideals did not. What Inkerman posted about miniaturization not happening in the Fallout universe is the main reason behind the different sort of rapid technological advancements that you see in the games, but I'll agree that some of the cultural stuff like the retro soundtracks and whatnot are a bit harder to explain. I just sort of go with it since I really like that old school sci-fi stuff.  
     
    I've heard before that the games are basically saying that things such as the retro music were the latest and greatest before the Great War due to the stagnation of American culture that started in the 50's.

    Avatar image for ryanwho
    ryanwho

    12011

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #22  Edited By ryanwho

    I appreciate all these novel theories but guess what, old songs don't have royalties that have to be paid out when they're used. And that's why Fallout uses them.

    Avatar image for fjordson
    fjordson

    2571

    Forum Posts

    430

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 6

    #23  Edited By fjordson
    @ryanwho said:
    I appreciate all these novel theories but guess what, old songs don't have royalties that have to be paid out when they're used. And that's why Fallout uses them.
    That seems like an utterly ridiculous reason, but okay.

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.