How Many People Have Signed Up? Accurate Count Reply Post

This may seem like an impossible count but I would like everyone who signed up for a subscription to post that they have done so so we can keep an accurate count.  This may seems difficult but I want the post count to reflect the amount of members.  This can only happen if everyone who has signed up only leaves one comment.  Ryan says that we have 2500, so I am hoping for at least 2500 posts which sounds crazy I know. 
 
So without further ado, reply to this topic with the word "Me"

Someone's full of himself. 

i didnt sign up...am i still allowed to use this topic?

" i didnt sign up...am i still allowed to use this topic? "

rah rah fight the powah

Me!?

my?

You know, I think I might not pay just because I don't like that medal dealy that subscribers have. It sort of blocks a small fraction of the bottom of user pics. 

" @hondorondo said:

" i didnt sign up...am i still allowed to use this topic? "

no. "

This thread doesn't really serve a purpose.  Knock off all the motherfuckery, fellas.

LOWER CLASS UPRISING!

It wouldn't surprise me if the limit has been reached, and we just haven't been informed.  If holding half of the bombcast hostage isn't below them (which I had been lead to believe it was, I guess when money is on the table people change quickly), then not telling us when they hit the limit to keep us in a subscribing frenzy, or just telling us they hit 5,000 anyway and were never planning on taking it away, isn't above them either.
 
I refuse to subscribe based on principle.

" It wouldn't surprise me if the limit has been reached, and we just haven't been informed.  If holding half of the bombcast hostage isn't below them (which I had been lead to believe it was, I guess when money is on the table people change quickly), then not telling us when they hit the limit to keep us in a subscribing frenzy, or just telling us they hit 5,000 anyway and were never planning on taking it away, isn't above them either.  I refuse to subscribe based on principle. "

" @whitesox said:

" It wouldn't surprise me if the limit has been reached, and we just haven't been informed.  If holding half of the bombcast hostage isn't below them (which I had been lead to believe it was, I guess when money is on the table people change quickly), then not telling us when they hit the limit to keep us in a subscribing frenzy, or just telling us they hit 5,000 anyway and were never planning on taking it away, isn't above them either.  I refuse to subscribe based on principle. "

Unreasonably cynical, much? "

I'm posting with an account.  IN YOUR FACE!

" @JJWeatherman said:

" @whitesox said:

" It wouldn't surprise me if the limit has been reached, and we just haven't been informed.  If holding half of the bombcast hostage isn't below them (which I had been lead to believe it was, I guess when money is on the table people change quickly), then not telling us when they hit the limit to keep us in a subscribing frenzy, or just telling us they hit 5,000 anyway and were never planning on taking it away, isn't above them either.  I refuse to subscribe based on principle. "

Unreasonably cynical, much? "

Very. And this is coming from a guy who completely disagrees with the split. "

I'm working on it! Probably tomorrow!

" @Manhattan_Project said:

" @JJWeatherman said:

" @whitesox said:

" It wouldn't surprise me if the limit has been reached, and we just haven't been informed.  If holding half of the bombcast hostage isn't below them (which I had been lead to believe it was, I guess when money is on the table people change quickly), then not telling us when they hit the limit to keep us in a subscribing frenzy, or just telling us they hit 5,000 anyway and were never planning on taking it away, isn't above them either.  I refuse to subscribe based on principle. "

Unreasonably cynical, much? "

Very. And this is coming from a guy who completely disagrees with the split. "

Call me cynical if you will, but I seriously would not be surprised at this point.  It's a shame. "

This is without a doubt the worst idea I've ever heard of.

" @whitesox said:

" @Manhattan_Project said:

" @JJWeatherman said:

" @whitesox said:

" It wouldn't surprise me if the limit has been reached, and we just haven't been informed.  If holding half of the bombcast hostage isn't below them (which I had been lead to believe it was, I guess when money is on the table people change quickly), then not telling us when they hit the limit to keep us in a subscribing frenzy, or just telling us they hit 5,000 anyway and were never planning on taking it away, isn't above them either.  I refuse to subscribe based on principle. "

Unreasonably cynical, much? "

Very. And this is coming from a guy who completely disagrees with the split. "

Call me cynical if you will, but I seriously would not be surprised at this point.  It's a shame. "

I hate to say it, but I agree. "

I wont be subscriber till my giantbomb issue and till I decide its worth it.

" @ajamafalous said:

" @whitesox said:

" @Manhattan_Project said:

" @JJWeatherman said:

" @whitesox said:

" It wouldn't surprise me if the limit has been reached, and we just haven't been informed.  If holding half of the bombcast hostage isn't below them (which I had been lead to believe it was, I guess when money is on the table people change quickly), then not telling us when they hit the limit to keep us in a subscribing frenzy, or just telling us they hit 5,000 anyway and were never planning on taking it away, isn't above them either.  I refuse to subscribe based on principle. "

Unreasonably cynical, much? "

Very. And this is coming from a guy who completely disagrees with the split. "

Call me cynical if you will, but I seriously would not be surprised at this point.  It's a shame. "

I hate to say it, but I agree. "

Really? Listen to this and tell me they don't sound sincere.  (Of course they don't talk about the 5,000 member thing as it wasn't established yet, but I just mean overall. They're good people.) "

" @ajamafalous said:

" @whitesox said:

" @Manhattan_Project said:

" @JJWeatherman said:

" @whitesox said:

" It wouldn't surprise me if the limit has been reached, and we just haven't been informed.  If holding half of the bombcast hostage isn't below them (which I had been lead to believe it was, I guess when money is on the table people change quickly), then not telling us when they hit the limit to keep us in a subscribing frenzy, or just telling us they hit 5,000 anyway and were never planning on taking it away, isn't above them either.  I refuse to subscribe based on principle. "

Unreasonably cynical, much? "

Very. And this is coming from a guy who completely disagrees with the split. "

Call me cynical if you will, but I seriously would not be surprised at this point.  It's a shame. "

I hate to say it, but I agree. "

Really? Listen to this and tell me they don't sound sincere. "

" @JJWeatherman said:

" @ajamafalous said:

" @whitesox said:

" @Manhattan_Project said:

" @JJWeatherman said:

" @whitesox said:

" It wouldn't surprise me if the limit has been reached, and we just haven't been informed.  If holding half of the bombcast hostage isn't below them (which I had been lead to believe it was, I guess when money is on the table people change quickly), then not telling us when they hit the limit to keep us in a subscribing frenzy, or just telling us they hit 5,000 anyway and were never planning on taking it away, isn't above them either.  I refuse to subscribe based on principle. "

Unreasonably cynical, much? "

Very. And this is coming from a guy who completely disagrees with the split. "

Call me cynical if you will, but I seriously would not be surprised at this point.  It's a shame. "

I hate to say it, but I agree. "

Really? Listen to this and tell me they don't sound sincere.  (Of course they don't talk about the 5,000 member thing as it wasn't established yet, but I just mean overall. They're good people.) "

They have said that the non member site would not be changed.  Removing half of the bombcast is changingthe site.  Maybe that is why I see this whole thing as a farce.  I don't care if they sound sincere or not, this is wrong.  And if you can't see that, then I don't know what to say. "

" @whitesox said:

" @JJWeatherman said:

" @ajamafalous said:

" @whitesox said:

" @Manhattan_Project said:

" @JJWeatherman said:

" @whitesox said:

" It wouldn't surprise me if the limit has been reached, and we just haven't been informed.  If holding half of the bombcast hostage isn't below them (which I had been lead to believe it was, I guess when money is on the table people change quickly), then not telling us when they hit the limit to keep us in a subscribing frenzy, or just telling us they hit 5,000 anyway and were never planning on taking it away, isn't above them either.  I refuse to subscribe based on principle. "

Unreasonably cynical, much? "

Very. And this is coming from a guy who completely disagrees with the split. "

Call me cynical if you will, but I seriously would not be surprised at this point.  It's a shame. "

I hate to say it, but I agree. "

Really? Listen to this and tell me they don't sound sincere.  (Of course they don't talk about the 5,000 member thing as it wasn't established yet, but I just mean overall. They're good people.) "

They have said that the non member site would not be changed.  Removing half of the bombcast is changingthe site.  Maybe that is why I see this whole thing as a farce.  I don't care if they sound sincere or not, this is wrong.  And if you can't see that, then I don't know what to say. "

I really disagree with all the podcast stuff and hope they change it, but really if all they do make a new itunes feed I will post the link myself for everyone. "

I support irresponsible shenanigans with my money.  I am an enabler.
 
That is all.

I wish I had one of those cool emblems signifying I was a paid member;(

Oh snap, I do!

:D

The site as you see it right now will remain  largely unchanged.

" @whitesox said:

" It wouldn't surprise me if the limit has been reached, and we just haven't been informed.  If holding half of the bombcast hostage isn't below them (which I had been lead to believe it was, I guess when money is on the table people change quickly), then not telling us when they hit the limit to keep us in a subscribing frenzy, or just telling us they hit 5,000 anyway and were never planning on taking it away, isn't above them either.  I refuse to subscribe based on principle. "

Unreasonably cynical, much? "

" @whitesox: @ajamafalous: From Dave Snider's blog;  

The site as you see it right now will remain  largely unchanged.

Nobody lied.  "

" @JJWeatherman said:

" @whitesox said:

" It wouldn't surprise me if the limit has been reached, and we just haven't been informed.  If holding half of the bombcast hostage isn't below them (which I had been lead to believe it was, I guess when money is on the table people change quickly), then not telling us when they hit the limit to keep us in a subscribing frenzy, or just telling us they hit 5,000 anyway and were never planning on taking it away, isn't above them either.  I refuse to subscribe based on principle. "

Unreasonably cynical, much? "

No way maaan, Giant Bomb is always trying to screw us over! Remember? All those times? In the past? Those times where they did something that was bad?  All those times? "

Nope

You expect everyone who subscribed to post in here? Ain't gonna happen. There are probably subscribers who have never posted anything; why would they start with this thread?

"Would that be legal? "

I think this thread is broken..... 
       
Quick, Lets fix it

" @whitesox: I'm just saying that we should give them the benefit of the doubt, because since this website began Whiskey Media has been trying to do right by us. Yes, I think the Bombcast thing is a bad idea, but I also think that they've earned the right to make a misstep without the community brutalising them. I just don't think they're the kind of guys to deviously misinform us. "

Me.

i`m broke

there's no fucking way in hell that i'd pay $50 a year to use a website.

" @whitesox said:

"Would that be legal? "

Of course it's legal. That doesn't mean it will be tolerated though. "

I dropped five bucks on the month, but only for the Bombcast. Let me be clear: I think this whole subscription service is a dirty cash grab, and I hate it. Don't get me wrong, I love the site, and I originally loved the idea of a subscription service, but this whole thing with the Bombcast being held "hostage" for 5,000 subscribers just disgusts me. It's dishonest, it's wrong, and it's crappy to the people who want to pay $50 a year, but just can't afford it.

" I dropped five bucks on the month, but only for the Bombcast. Let me be clear: I think this whole subscription service is a dirty cash grab, and I hate it. Don't get me wrong, I love the site, and I originally loved the idea of a subscription service, but this whole thing with the Bombcast being held "hostage" for 5,000 subscribers just disgusts me. It's dishonest, it's wrong, and it's crappy to the people who want to pay $50 a year, but just can't afford it. "