#1 Posted by ShadowSkill11 (1783 posts) -

http://kotaku.com/moneysaver-one-shot-a-4k-tv-for-966-513671749

I just couldn't pass this up myself. I got a PS4/X1 launch model pre-ordered on Monday and couldn't resist this deal today.

#2 Edited by Turtlebird95 (2343 posts) -

That's an impressive deal, but I think I'll hold off until 4KTVs are more common. I've never heard of Seiki Digital and I'd be more comfortable with a brand I'm familiar with.

#3 Posted by Azteck (7449 posts) -

I'd rather use a 4k TV with my PC where I actually have use for it.

#4 Edited by Jazzycola (662 posts) -

Seiki? Good luck with that. Also, games will not run at 4k resolution. There's just no way, so there isn't a benefit to have it for gaming (not to mention there is very little media that even has 4k content).

#5 Posted by zoozilla (978 posts) -

I don't really get the point of 4k TVs - I mean, movie theaters still use 2K a lot of the time. A 4K TV that's only 50 inches doesn't seem very compelling. That's just me, though.

#6 Posted by Icemo (642 posts) -

There is really no need for 4k television if you don't have a monster PC that costs a lot of money. You might be able to watch 4k movies when they come out with next gen consoles, but I don't think they have enough power for playing games at 4k resolution. I would wait for 4K material to be more common if I were you.

#7 Posted by EvilNiGHTS (1093 posts) -

If HDTV prices over the last ten years are any indication, they'll drop faster than my pants while checking the Xvideos RSS feed. No sense in being an early adopter on this stuff.

#8 Edited by Nethlem (407 posts) -

No sense in being an early adopter on this stuff.

Especially a cheap one..

50" 4k TV for less than $1000? There has to be something stinking here, no way they can deliver that resolution at that price, at least not without cutting back on performance in other areas like latency/colors/features. I wouldn't trust a regular HDTV in the sub $1000 to be suitable for my gaming needs, so a 4k TV in that price range seems kinda like a fishy deal.

#9 Posted by PillClinton (3291 posts) -

Save the money, buy a really nice, even bigger 1080p TV, or buy a high quality 30'' monitor. All those would be better choices.

#10 Edited by mrfluke (5127 posts) -

wayyyyyyyyyy to early to buy one of those,

its a great price though.

#11 Edited by tourgen (4459 posts) -

how close to a 50" do you have to sit to make the difference between 1080 and 4000 matter? 2 feet?

#12 Posted by Colourful_Hippie (4337 posts) -

lol yeah because I'll be able to take advantage of all the native 4k games, huh? I won't lie though, if I didn't already bought the nice tv that I did a couple months ago I probably would have jumped on this offer, I could see myself messing around with it on a PC.

#13 Edited by StrikeALight (1114 posts) -

@mrfluke said:

wayyyyyyyyyy to early to buy one of those,

its a great price though.

Yeah, think I'll pass.

#14 Edited by KrypticKiller (190 posts) -

@nethlem said:

@evilnights said:

No sense in being an early adopter on this stuff.

Especially a cheap one..

50" 4k TV for less than $1000? There has to be something stinking here, no way they can deliver that resolution at that price, at least not without cutting back on performance in other areas like latency/colors/features. I wouldn't trust a regular HDTV in the sub $1000 to be suitable for my gaming needs, so a 4k TV in that price range seems kinda like a fishy deal.

You must have at least a 50" screen right? Otherwise I think you paid a bit to much.

#15 Posted by adam1808 (1425 posts) -

4K TVs are dumb. This coming console generation is just about to make 1080p standard and there's no media out there that makes it worth diving in early.

#16 Posted by slowhanded (22 posts) -

Why not spend that money on say, a better TV? $1000 can get you a panny plasma. More than likely better than what you're watching from, and far better quality than a budget, no-name brand 4k TV. The blacks alone should be a huge upgrade from most LCDs.

#17 Edited by TheManWithNoPlan (5368 posts) -

While that's a pretty good deal, in reality you'd have to be a special kind of crazy to buy one now. It'll be awhile before there's a significant amount of anything to support 4k.

#18 Posted by Andorski (5239 posts) -

Why would you want a 4K TV for PS4 or X1? The vast majority of games will be at 1080p.

#19 Edited by Zekhariah (697 posts) -

@andorski: They probably have decent upscaling hardware.

The big limitation with 4k right now will be the max 30Hz screen refresh rate, because of the current HDMI standard. Work is being done to finalize an update leading into having higher frame-rate 4k work (and display port theoretically ahs some support of it), but its not really a mature tech. I think Samsung indicated their TVs would be upgradable to the new standard when it comes out, but that is not the sort of arrangement Seiki will have (though I do think they are probably a legit enough brand - post CCFL backlights there should not be to much left to have a horrible failure rate even if you go cheap on materials).

#20 Posted by ShaggE (6401 posts) -

4K? More like "por qué"! Oooooooh snap.

#21 Posted by Nethlem (407 posts) -

@kryptickiller: I've got an 60" Samsung Plasma from last years lineup. And that thing, even with a really good deal, did cost me 1400 Euro.

Not saying that cheap things are worse no matter what. But when somebody is trying to sell you a Ferrari for $100 there has to be something fishy about that deal.

#22 Posted by bemusedchunk (681 posts) -

I don't even think many video cards can hit the 4k resolution needed yet...

#23 Posted by TheCreamFilling (1225 posts) -

Is 4K the new 3D?

#24 Edited by Winternet (8012 posts) -

Wake me up when 16k comes around.

#25 Posted by KrypticKiller (190 posts) -

@nethlem: I totally agree with you with regards to this tv. I was just wondering what size of screen you had as I have not seen a tv below 50" for more than $900.

#26 Edited by SomeJerk (3203 posts) -

What's confirmed about this panel is that it's got the pixels, just not the prettiest colours. This is the real deal, this is an attempt at shaking up the industry and I hope it takes us somewhere.

I thought what if, I got one of these for development? What if I modified Diablo 2 to take advantage of 4K? Here's the equivalent of D2's 800x600 resolution maximum in a 4k 16:9 field.

I think it'd be weird to get one of these displays if you weren't a huge PC nerd able to put it to use but more sales for this company = larger chance the big players will adapt.