@revel: Yeah, I feel like they can’t have these discussions without spoilers.
I play less games too, and have been cramming to get through stuff before the deliberations. It feels like this is the last year I’ll bother as the deliberations have been mediocre for a few years.
That said, I did fast forward through ALL the Red Dead stuff last year (still haven’t found time to start that game). I skipped Alex’s plea for Judgment, too, as I’m about 20 hours into that one.
I think the spoilers are needed, but it does suck when they’re thrown out there without reason. Detailing the Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order arc and ending this year felt totally meaningless. It was detailed, then immediately nullified with something along the lines of “well, the story is rote, but the characters are really what does it.” IF THE STORY ISN’T A HUGE DEAL, WHY DETAIL IT???”
And yeah, I feel like Brad is a spoiler machine. I have a friend like that. It’s always:
“hey, did you see this?”
- No, but I want to
“I saw it, it was great! Want to know how it ends?”
- No, I’d like to watch it for myse-
[proceeds to give away ending]
It’s innocent excitement, not malice, but MAN I could do without it. I think some people just get very excited to talk about things. In the case of Brad, I do wish he’d consider the points he’s making before unleashing a barrage of plot details on the listener. I think in the case of Fallen Order, he nearly immediately removed the game from contention after detailing the ending.
They do spoiler tag the hell out of these podcasts, though...so we have been warned.
Log in to comment