I think it's a really interesting question to ask, I just wish someone actually had an example cuz I can't think of any for myself. Maybe all the offended people are too busy complaining about the offensive games in other threads.
I don't want to sound like a hypocrite, but the only thing that I could say might actually "offend" me is people that get actively offended by stuff. When I say actively I mean like, "I don't like something, therefore it shouldn't exist and nobody should get to..." view/listen to/partake in whatever they're talking about and then they start writing letters and protesting and trying to create drama. I think it just reveals a sense of entitlement and shows how self-centered people can be.
Obviously there are things that are just bad, destructive, harmful, damaging, however you want to put it, and those things need to be addressed. However, when it's literally something that's only doing harm in your opinion, but there is no evidence to back that up, then you're just being an entitled douche if you think it shouldn't exist or it should be significantly altered in some way that you find acceptable. The easy example is all the politicians and parents that think video games cause children to become violent in real life and all that nonsense. They can go ahead and never play the games and not like it all they want, but when they start trying to argue that nobody should be playing them, even adults, that's when they cross over into reactive, entitled, self-centered, moron territory.
Log in to comment