I just pissed off two groups with one topic title. The ones that blindly hate Kojima and the ones who believe Stephen King is a God. But let me explain my reasoning for why I believe both are highly alike.
Hideo Kojima is thousands of times better at making an ending than Stephen King has ever done. let me get this out of the way. Now, certain books like Running Man and The Long Walk have great endings. But even then, a huge majority of Stephen Kings endings are craptastic and underwhelming beyond belief. I won't spoil any of his books, but for anyone who has read them KNOWS how terrible he is at ending his books. Hideo however knows how to craft a far better ending than the current master of horror can. Every games ending he does is insightful, has a meaning to it, and actually does feel like a ending where you want more but know that it has come to an end anyway.
Hideo is also much more daring in his stories than Stephen King is in most of his works. (except The Stand and the dark tower series of course.) But Hideo seems like he is willing to try much more out than reserve himself. The Psycho mantis fight is proof enough that the guy is very daring. But also the fact that he is willing to be ridiculous while also being pretty damn serious in a very believable way is also a strange talent I would say, although, whether that is good or bad is for each person to decide.
Characters. Now, I might get flak for this, but I would say they are both equal in terms of making great characters. Roland Deschain and Solid Snake are quite possibly two of the biggest badasses ever made in human thought. Although I got to minus from Stephen King due to the fact that he also makes characters that are pretty damn boring quite a bit. The Stand comes to mind when I bring this up. Just very slow paced characters in that book. But Hideo is capable of making pretty crazy characters that we honestly feel sorry for like Sniper wolf or Psycho mantis or even hate with a passion like Volgin or ocelot. But it works for him in a way that it wouldn't for many others. hell, he even make a dorky scientist that loves anime into a great character, gotta give him points for that.
In terms of story however, I would say that Stephen King does take a safe road more often than Hideo does. I would go deeper into this, but I wouldn't like to spoil anything of each others stories. But I will say that Hideo is a much more daring man than Stephen King is about story.
Both ways work amazingly well though.
One problem both face however are both completely different, Hideo tends to over explain things in everything he does while King doesn't explain certain points enough. The Dark tower, The Stand, The long walk. Almost all his books suffer this Which is better though, over explaination or no explaination at all? Is up for debate. But personally, I would rather know what is going on than just make up a reason why that happened. I find that a over explained story has much fewer plot holes than any story that doesn't explain anything at all. IMO.
I will probably get massively trolled and flamed for saying this. But to be quite honest, these are my views as both as writers. both are talented but have flaws that you can notice in each others work.
Log in to comment