I just couldn't stand that they were going award after award before commercials. I think as an Award show they should present the award to the producers/developers in hand. and not just show 4 people getting awards.
Jeff's Thoughts On Those Spike TV Awards
I watched enough of the show to figure out that Felicia Day is terrible, fake John Krasinski is terrible, and Spike TV is terrible. Also this reply is terrible and you are terrible for reading it.
I'm really glad I read this. I think Jeff's right that people act as thought the VGAs are the only show in town. However, to a degree, they are. Like it or not, the VGAs are THE representation of our favorite medium's "best" games outside of the internet, magazines, and the occasional cover art reading "10/10: Game Informer". I think it's somewhat appropriate for us to be upset when games are misrepresented on the biggest stage they have. It would be like if the Oscars were all references to Meet the Fockers and Transformers.
The DICE summit and the AIAS awards are a step in the right direction but even among major "gamers", they're relatively un-heard-of.
@hbkdx12 said:
@BitterAlmond said:Why are you glad that they exist when it's complete bullshit? Even a respectable dev like Cliffy B even said so in a tweet. If the show is there to help market games and offer debut trailers and otherwise entertain on a rather simplistic and juvenile level then fine, so be but let it be that. Don't try to suggest it's something more when it really isntPeople who actually follow the industry (or, even better, work in it) don't much care for it, but we all understand that it's an important thing in order to keep video games going as strongly as they are. I don't watch the Spike VGAs, and I don't like them, but I am very glad they exist.
I'm glad they exist because they do just what you said: they help market games. If you were to draw a Venn diagram of Spike's core fanbase and video gamers, I doubt there would be much overlap. The show helps the industry as a whole by promoting video games and increasing sales in demographics that wouldn't normally buy games. So what if it's "bullshit?"
Because the same result would come if they just labeled the show as a video game expo or something similar where all they did is showcase upcoming games. If they wanted to make it particularly interesting, they could still have devs show up and give insight in their own games as well as other games they saw. I dunno. Something. Then breaking up the monotony with stupid stuff like bobbing for cupcakes wouldn't seem so ridiculous. As it's all a means of entertainment and good fun.@hbkdx12 said:
@BitterAlmond said:Why are you glad that they exist when it's complete bullshit? Even a respectable dev like Cliffy B even said so in a tweet. If the show is there to help market games and offer debut trailers and otherwise entertain on a rather simplistic and juvenile level then fine, so be but let it be that. Don't try to suggest it's something more when it really isntPeople who actually follow the industry (or, even better, work in it) don't much care for it, but we all understand that it's an important thing in order to keep video games going as strongly as they are. I don't watch the Spike VGAs, and I don't like them, but I am very glad they exist.
I'm glad they exist because they do just what you said: they help market games. If you were to draw a Venn diagram of Spike's core fanbase and video gamers, I doubt there would be much overlap. The show helps the industry as a whole by promoting video games and increasing sales in demographics that wouldn't normally buy games. So what if it's "bullshit?"
But to label the whole thing an award show to honor and give recognition to developers and such and essentially do none of that and just have it turn into a crap shoot of a spectacle is absurd. I feel like a good route to take would be to have an award show that creates some kind of transparency into the developers and the video game industry as a whole. For example, Naughty Dog has behind the scenes featurettes on both Uncharted 2 and 3 about their process for making those games. Imagine if they had 3 minute segments like that from different devs sprinkled throughout the show that showcases them working on/giving their thoughts about their most notable title for the year.
@hbkdx12 said:
@BitterAlmond said:Because the same result would come if they just labeled the show as a video game expo or something similar where all they did is showcase upcoming games. If they wanted to make it particularly interesting, they could still have devs show up and give insight in their own games as well as other games they saw. I dunno. Something. Then breaking up the monotony with stupid stuff like bobbing for cupcakes wouldn't seem so ridiculous. As it's all a means of entertainment and good fun. But to label the whole thing an award show to honor and give recognition to developers and such and essentially do none of that and just have it turn into a crap shoot of a spectacle is absurd. I feel like a good route to take would be to have an award show that creates some kind of transparency into the developers and the video game industry as a whole. For example, Naughty Dog has behind the scenes featurettes on both Uncharted 2 and 3 about their process for making those games. Imagine if they had 3 minute segments like that from different devs sprinkled throughout the show that showcases them working on/giving their thoughts about their most notable title for the year.@hbkdx12 said:
@BitterAlmond said:Why are you glad that they exist when it's complete bullshit? Even a respectable dev like Cliffy B even said so in a tweet. If the show is there to help market games and offer debut trailers and otherwise entertain on a rather simplistic and juvenile level then fine, so be but let it be that. Don't try to suggest it's something more when it really isntPeople who actually follow the industry (or, even better, work in it) don't much care for it, but we all understand that it's an important thing in order to keep video games going as strongly as they are. I don't watch the Spike VGAs, and I don't like them, but I am very glad they exist.
I'm glad they exist because they do just what you said: they help market games. If you were to draw a Venn diagram of Spike's core fanbase and video gamers, I doubt there would be much overlap. The show helps the industry as a whole by promoting video games and increasing sales in demographics that wouldn't normally buy games. So what if it's "bullshit?"
Hey, not all award shows are great, nor are many presigious. Just look at the Razzies.
I'd rather watch Conan or Kimmel (hell, is Jimmy Fallon around still?) have a 2 hour special that show all the clips (trailers), have a few interviews with some developers, see ONE "wacky" stunt, have deadmaus play us in and out of commercials, and the Black Keys play in the last segment. ... or just leave it alone & I'll just PVR it and skip to the vids like I have in the past.
Interesting diatribe. I think that your thoughts are pretty dead on about everything. I am sure that we just have to wait a little while longer and something like DICE or GDC might get some mainstream play.
I don't see how this awards show for video games is any different from the usual mentality of the Tech Sector's (private sector's) parties and conventions. E3 and even your own "Big Big Live Show" (or what ever it's called) are no less "debauched," unless... it's because its not exclusive to your community, thus "not better" than your (the private sector's) own version of "self celebration." This article is only an example of how "out of touch" the wealthy (or privileged/gainfully employed) increasingly are, with us struggling regulars, with the 1% worrying about how it is depicted. Our tea bagging is better than the kind that Spike TV slapped together, for us. What I find interesting is that business goes on as usual in, uh... so-called "enlightened" areas like San Francisco. But we all know 4chan, adbusters and Anonymous and so forth are "buddies" looking to solidify the increasing class(/social caste) gap through trite efforts to destabilize (/or annoy rather) Western Civilization. There's nothing to see here. See you all at PAX!
(two cents spent).
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment