It concerns the last paragraph of the duck hunt article
http://www.giantbomb.com/duck-hunt/61-2758/
I tried my best to explain it as clearly as possible, perhaps some of the thing i say are not as clear as they could be.
Need someone to check if something i wrote is understandable.
I must say, I am not well versed in the technical aspects of Duck Hunt, but I can help with a few spelling and grammatical changes. So, I would change it too:
Lets imagine that there is a duck at pixel B and that you are aiming correctly. You press the trigger, the screen turns black and then then screen starts to become white. After two seconds pixel B will become white, the light gun will send a positive signal to the NES. The NES knows that the duck was at pixel B and that after you pulled the trigger it took 2 seconds before the signal came from the light gun. By doing some calculations, then game can show the duck being gunned down. Using this technique Duck Hunt was able to put more than one duck on screen at a time.
Now, if anything is factually wrong with that, then my bad, change it back, but I hope that helped! =)
"I must say, I am not well versed in the technical aspects of Duck Hunt, but I can help with a few spelling and grammatical changes. So, I would change it too:sounds better indeed, im putting it in.
Lets imagine that there is a duck at pixel B and that you are aiming correctly. You press the trigger, the screen turns black and then then screen starts to become white. After two seconds pixel B will become white, the light gun will send a positive signal to the NES. The NES knows that the duck was at pixel B and that after you pulled the trigger it took 2 seconds before the signal came from the light gun. By doing some calculations, then game can show the duck being gunned down. Using this technique Duck Hunt was able to put more than one duck on screen at a time.
Now, if anything is factually wrong with that, then my bad, change it back, but I hope that helped! =)"
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment