people take x-play reviews seriously?

 is that a joke?
adam some times says something smart but if its not a FPS they don't give it a chance.
case in point star ocean 2 remake on the psp review, the whole review was "whats star ocean, I don't care about star ocean, I never played the original so I'm going to shit all over this remake"
but really star ocean 2 was an amazing game on the ps1 and now the remade it put in tons and tons of new stuff and made the graphics better.

 is that a joke?
adam some times says something smart but if its not a FPS they don't give it a chance.
case in point star ocean 2 remake on the psp review, the whole review was "whats star ocean, I don't care about star ocean, I never played the original so I'm going to shit all over this remake"
but really star ocean 2 was an amazing game on the ps1 and now the remade it put in tons and tons of new stuff and made the graphics better.

the real question is: will you tap Morgan Webb?

Eh, most "professional" reviewers are all the same to me. I generally just scan metacritic. If it gets a high score I know it's probably made by a mainstream developer and has good graphics. That's about it, really.

That said, X-Play is worth watching. Here's why:

Yes...Xplay reviews hold the same weight as ANY reviews outlet. There is bias in all outlets.

I dont see how this required its own thread, you said this is the RE5 thread, and it was just as ignorant.

XPlay is fine. I might not like G4TV but I have some respect for Adam Sessler for the Resident Evil 5 review and his response video to the comments on Killzone 2.

XPlay is an okay outlet for game reviews. Everyone likes some reviewers and hates others. I actually like XPlay. They have had some great reviews, even if I don't like their RE5 review. Still, Adam knows what he is talking about for the most part and knows how to lay the smackdown on fanboys (i.e. Killzone 2).