Why Bill S.978 is a Good Idea

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for hurrydurry
HURRyDURRy

44

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By HURRyDURRy

Click here to read information regarding the proposed bill: http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s978/show 
 
It is important with the current direction of the games industry to keep people from seeing reviews and videos of games that will potentially hurt sales. 
 
This is a logical conclusion to an industry which is focusing more of its energies to a more focused marketing environment for their products. Having word-of-mouth which is potentially harmful is bad for business, so it is important to curb it as much as possible. 
 
Consider the fact that this will probably get passed with the massive amount of money that pours into the industry, and this is what they desire to happen. 
 
What makes all of this good for you and I, is the fact that it will inevitably cause a lack of specific forms of marketing to occur any longer, and the fact that this is even up for discussion, let alone close to being in the books, as a positive sign. Nothing but good news. This is essentially the same as "shooting yourself in the foot" Bravo

Avatar image for hurrydurry
HURRyDURRy

44

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By HURRyDURRy

Click here to read information regarding the proposed bill: http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s978/show 
 
It is important with the current direction of the games industry to keep people from seeing reviews and videos of games that will potentially hurt sales. 
 
This is a logical conclusion to an industry which is focusing more of its energies to a more focused marketing environment for their products. Having word-of-mouth which is potentially harmful is bad for business, so it is important to curb it as much as possible. 
 
Consider the fact that this will probably get passed with the massive amount of money that pours into the industry, and this is what they desire to happen. 
 
What makes all of this good for you and I, is the fact that it will inevitably cause a lack of specific forms of marketing to occur any longer, and the fact that this is even up for discussion, let alone close to being in the books, as a positive sign. Nothing but good news. This is essentially the same as "shooting yourself in the foot" Bravo

Avatar image for imsh_pl
imsh_pl

4208

Forum Posts

51

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#2  Edited By imsh_pl

It won't get passed.

Avatar image for karlpilkington
KarlPilkington

2844

Forum Posts

824

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

#3  Edited By KarlPilkington

What would Youtube do/become?

Avatar image for lockwoodx
lockwoodx

2531

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By lockwoodx

@Chabbs0 said:

What would Youtube do/become?

Become GoogleTV.

Avatar image for mikemcn
mikemcn

8642

Forum Posts

4863

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 8

#5  Edited By mikemcn

@Buzzkill said:

@Chabbs0 said:

What would Youtube do/become?

Become GoogleTV.

Youtube wouldn't change much at all actually.

Avatar image for bocam
Bocam

4099

Forum Posts

3868

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#6  Edited By Bocam

Look at his avatar... don't be dumb

Avatar image for iam3green
iam3green

14368

Forum Posts

350

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By iam3green

i hope that it doesn't get passed. it seems kind of stupid to do that, it will make video games make infragments. if it does pass than we won't be able to see gameplay of the game.

Avatar image for subjugation
Subjugation

4993

Forum Posts

963

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#8  Edited By Subjugation

@Bocam said:

Look at his avatar... don't be dumb

Beat me to it. Saw avatar. Read post.

... Not sure if serious ...

Avatar image for starvinggamer
StarvingGamer

11533

Forum Posts

36428

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 25

#9  Edited By StarvingGamer

@imsh_pl said:

It won't get passed.

I admire your blind optimism in the face of backing from both political parties and massive pushing from TV and movie lobbyists.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cc8838532af0
deactivated-5cc8838532af0

3170

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 12

Does this mean no more TnT, if so I may have to get a pitchfork out.

Avatar image for rebirth1337
Rebirth1337

849

Forum Posts

134

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#11  Edited By Rebirth1337

This sounds like a bad idea and a waste of money.

Avatar image for oatz
oatz

1108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#12  Edited By oatz
If you say so, Mr Kotick.
Avatar image for quististrepe
QuistisTrepe

633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13  Edited By QuistisTrepe

LMAO, well played.

Avatar image for ragdrazi
Ragdrazi

2258

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14  Edited By Ragdrazi
@HURRyDURRy said:
Click here to read information regarding the proposed bill: http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s978/show  It is important with the current direction of the games industry to keep people from seeing reviews and videos of games that will potentially hurt sales.  This is a logical conclusion to an industry which is focusing more of its energies to a more focused marketing environment for their products. Having word-of-mouth which is potentially harmful is bad for business, so it is important to curb it as much as possible.  Consider the fact that this will probably get passed with the massive amount of money that pours into the industry, and this is what they desire to happen.  What makes all of this good for you and I, is the fact that it will inevitably cause a lack of specific forms of marketing to occur any longer, and the fact that this is even up for discussion, let alone close to being in the books, as a positive sign. Nothing but good news. This is essentially the same as "shooting yourself in the foot" Bravo
I see what you did there.
Avatar image for deactivated-6418ef3727cdd
deactivated-6418ef3727cdd

2721

Forum Posts

697

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

An account named HURR DURR sporting a Bobby Kotick avatar? This sounds like serious business! We'd better pay attention kids.

Avatar image for thepickle
ThePickle

4704

Forum Posts

14415

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

#16  Edited By ThePickle

@imsh_pl said:

It won't get passed.

Let's hope.

Avatar image for siphillis
Siphillis

1357

Forum Posts

6549

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 17

#17  Edited By Siphillis
@HURRyDURRy said: 
Having word-of-mouth which is potentially harmful is bad for business, so it is important to curb it as much as possible.  
You know what else would curb negative word-of-mouth?  Actually making quality games. 
 
Also, I can't help by marvel at how appropriate your avatar is. 
Avatar image for nux
Nux

2898

Forum Posts

130

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 2

#18  Edited By Nux

Stoping websites from showing off games sure sounds like a good idea. Who wants to know stuff about video games anyway?

Avatar image for seanthebomb
SeanTheBomb

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19  Edited By SeanTheBomb

Technically, gaming companies can already forcefully remove videos from YouTube posted by lets players and such. The reason they don't is because its attention for there game and overall helps sales. I can understand this from the movies and TV shows perspective because, once you see it once, you generally will not purchase a DVD of it or watch it on TV again. This is different with video games though since a lot of the enjoyment can be derived from the game-play and there really is no substitute for actually playing the game. That said, I still do not think this Bill has any chance of passing in its current form since it is worded so vaguely.

Avatar image for punisherkaos
punisherkaos

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#20  Edited By punisherkaos

Wait so will this prevent game websites from showing game footage at all?

Avatar image for longmasterwolf
LongMasterWolf

244

Forum Posts

290

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

#21  Edited By LongMasterWolf

loled:  
 
Name: Hurry Durrry 
Pic: Derped Kotick 
Post: Trollin 
# of posts on site: 11 
 
 
Obvious troll is......

Avatar image for iamjohn
iamjohn

6297

Forum Posts

13905

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#22  Edited By iamjohn

@weeman105 said:

@Bocam said:

Look at his avatar... don't be dumb

Beat me to it. Saw avatar. Read post.

... Not sure if serious ...

Yep.

Avatar image for tennmuerti
Tennmuerti

9465

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 7

#23  Edited By Tennmuerti

Flagged for obvious trolling.

Avatar image for mikkaq
MikkaQ

10296

Forum Posts

52

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#24  Edited By MikkaQ

Why not just make games that don't suck?

Avatar image for sweep
sweep

10887

Forum Posts

3660

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 14

#25  Edited By sweep  Moderator