So i was watching American dad the other day, and there was this episode about his gay neighbors being conservative and i wondered if there is such a thing. I think it would be pretty cool cause you going after your beliefs even if they are not to your benefit, the ultimate test of political passion(there's other ways too). So yeah i know about 20-30 gay people and they are pretty much all liberals, just curious on if you guys ever met one, or other types of people who support groups that don't support their life CHOICE(aka not black people supporting obama).
Gay and Conservative?
People vote against their best interests all the time due to lack of understanding a candidate's position on issues. I've never heard of anyone gay being misinformed enough to vote conservative. However, I'm sure it's possible that there are gay Republicans who are conservative due to owning a business?
I know a guy who is not only gay and conservative, but also an active catholic. A rare specimen indeed.
I know a guy who is not only gay and conservative, but also an active catholic. A rare specimen indeed.does the church know he is gay??
@benjaebe said:
Any examples? i can't buy what your saying unless you provide a conservative politician who's been caught being gay(sounds weird).But no, seriously, it's insane to me that Republican politicians who are privately gay regularly vote against gay rights and campaign on platforms stating such. How fucked up is that?
@ShadowofIntent said:I know a guy who is not only gay and conservative, but also an active catholic. A rare specimen indeed.does the church know he is gay??
@benjaebe said:Any examples? i can't buy what your saying unless you provide a conservative politician who's been caught being gay(sounds weird).But no, seriously, it's insane to me that Republican politicians who are privately gay regularly vote against gay rights and campaign on platforms stating such. How fucked up is that?
I forget his name but a few years ago a republican congressman was caught in a sexual act with a man in an airport bathroom.
@gamefreak9 said:There was Ken Mehlman who came out last year.@ShadowofIntent said:I forget his name but a few years ago a republican congressman was caught in a sexual act with a man in an airport bathroom.I know a guy who is not only gay and conservative, but also an active catholic. A rare specimen indeed.does the church know he is gay??
@benjaebe said:Any examples? i can't buy what your saying unless you provide a conservative politician who's been caught being gay(sounds weird).But no, seriously, it's insane to me that Republican politicians who are privately gay regularly vote against gay rights and campaign on platforms stating such. How fucked up is that?
I've always questioned why gay people would vote for republicans. I don't understand voting for someone who thinks you should have fewer rights than others.
Depends. I'm sure there are plenty of gays that hate poor people and are all for blowing up all the ragheads. I doubt there are too many religious fundamentalists though.
Thing about gay people is that being gay isn't the only thing that defines them any more than being straight totally defines straight people. Some gay people would vote Republican because they put their stances on taxes, business, security, etc. ahead of their sexuality. While a gay person may or may not be upset that they aren't favored within a party they may feel it's worth it to get their party to change over time or that they're happy enough with things that they don't feel the potential negative impact outweighs the perceived advantages from their viewpoint.
It's not that strange. Do you agree with everything your party/affiliation does?
I've known a few gay conservatives. Some of them feel that gay rights are not as pressing a concern as the economy or foreign policy, for example. Gay rights are pretty inevitable in the U.S.; it's less a matter of "if" than "when" at this point. I can see where one could justify putting off progress in some areas to benefit other priorities. It's not as if liberal politicians are doing all that much to help the cause; most of the progress has come from court rulings and constituent pressure.
I think the fact that we can ask this question yet people still vote be Conservative says a lot about the state of the world.
... no it isn't.American Dad is awesome!
Seriously.
Its even worse than Family Guy. I don't know how thats even possible, but it is.
Conservative doesn't have to mean bible thumping retard, just like liberal doesn't have to mean aging hippy douchebag.
There's tons of reasons to vote and how people stereotype each side as one extreme end has always bothered me. Not that people on those extremes don't exist, but they're hardly the norm.
For example, I vote conservative (in canada - granted ours are a lot less.. bad than the states, but still) because I believe in less government and in cutting social programs, not making more, with the economy in a roughpatch right now.
That does NOT mean I'm against people sucking on whatever genitals they like, or that I want women repressed or that I'm religious or some shit.
So yes, you can be gay and conservative. Although you're probably not going to be a social conservative.
Then again, Homosexuals seem to want Gay Marriage and not just Civil Union which makes no fucking sense at all to me, so what do I know.
I think theres a big difference between libertarian, conservative and Conservative.
Libertarians essentially want some sort of organized free for all with private industry at the center, minimal taxes, little to no government regulation or oversight and a government whose only role is defense.
The conservatives want something similar, perhaps only adding a bit more of a role to the government: promoting private industry (as well as defense).
The Conservatives want the same stuff + enforced Christianity (usually skewed to some sort of old testament views).
So I can see how someone might be gay and libertarian or conservative, but not gay and Conservative. I can't picture a sane gay person voting for Sarah Palin for example.
There are no gay people in Serbia, at least not openly gay, for reference see the 2001 pride parade in Belgrade...good times, good times :D
Seth MacFarlane has a pretty warped view on political groups in America, even the stereotypes associated with them.
I remember his examples of right wing plutocrats included Ted Turner, Bill Gates and Michael Eisner (all of whom are outspoken liberals). He also associates northeast elitist prep school crowds with the Republican party, despite that subculture historically being associated with the American left. He also seems to think the Christian fundamentalism fad in recent political times means everyone who supports capitalism (for better or worse) must also be religious.
He's an idiot, basically. American Dad is funny, but you're better off ignoring any political message in it. Family Guy, however, is a train wreck.
Most American Republicans that are lower class or middle class are usually voting against their own interests. They vote based off of religion, abortion, and gun rights, while the actual politics of the Republican party are counter to what they need.
Well I would say if being conservative means holding to a cogent set of ideas about government intrusion into private life, then a gay person is in a way definition-ally conservative and any conservative who thinks homosexuals should have government rules established against them in any way is also a hypocrite.
That is, so long as you want your political leanings to hold to any cogent set of ideas. Otherwise, of course, you can be a 'social conservative' which is a fucking oxymoron, considering social conservatives want to government to spend more money enforcing social regulations, flying right in the face of all their fiscal conservative dogma.
Liberals don't have it any better, mind you. Nobody can form a belief set that is consistent with itself. Moral issues stick out to me because 'social conservatives' violate their fiscal conservative beliefs by upholding social conservatism.
And the whole policy of conservatives supporting national defense is a big fucking mistake too. Not because spending money on national defense is a mistake. (I mean, it is, but that's up for debate). It's a fucking mistake for conservatives to support this if they truly believe in small government ideas. It's the left that should support government spending on military technology.
fffffuck.... this just makes me mad.
@Dany: You don't have to be republican to be conservative. Most of this thread is about people being gay and republican.
I've always questioned why gay people would vote for republicans. I don't understand voting for someone who thinks you should have fewer rights than others.On the state or county level not every single Republican is anti-gay marriage.
Well I would say if being conservative means holding to a cogent set of ideas about government intrusion into private life, then a gay person is in a way definition-ally conservative and any conservative who thinks homosexuals should have government rules established against them in any way is also a hypocrite. That is, so long as you want your political leanings to hold to any cogent set of ideas. Otherwise, of course, you can be a 'social conservative' which is a fucking oxymoron, considering social conservatives want to government to spend more money enforcing social regulations, flying right in the face of all their fiscal conservative dogma. Liberals don't have it any better, mind you. Nobody can form a belief set that is consistent with itself. Moral issues stick out to me because 'social conservatives' violate their fiscal conservative beliefs by upholding social conservatism. And the whole policy of conservatives supporting national defense is a big fucking mistake too. Not because spending money on national defense is a mistake. (I mean, it is, but that's up for debate). It's a fucking mistake for conservatives to support this if they truly believe in small government ideas. It's the left that should support government spending on military technology. fffffuck.... this just makes me mad.The majority of conservatives tend to hold the idea that if there should be only 1 function of a government than that function should be defense. Look at someone like Ron Paul who recently purposed that citizens should be able to "opt out" of ANY federal government program if they pay a 10% flat tax. The exception? That flat tax is needed for defense spending. The concept is small government, not no government.
@gamefreak9 said:
So i was watching American dad the other day, and there was this episode about his gay neighbors being conservative and i wondered if there is such a thing. I think it would be pretty cool cause you going after your beliefs even if they are not to your benefit, the ultimate test of political passion(there's other ways too). So yeah i know about 20-30 gay people and they are pretty much all liberals, just curious on if you guys ever met one, or other types of people who support groups that don't support their life CHOICE(aka not black people supporting obama).
PROP 8 - it was voted out by Gay Conservatives. I'm not even American and I know that much.
I suspect you might be ill-informed to some degree.
First, it isn't just homosexuals who want equality in marriage. I'm a man with an unimpeachable record of strict gynosexuality, and I don't suspect that will change anytime soon; that being said, I don't want a load of zealous bigots telling me whom I may or may not marry. I should have the right to marry a bloke, regardless of my intent to exercise it. If you don't see the insult involved, a comparison could be made to being black and having someone introduce you as "one of the good ones"; bigotry, even when presenting itself to be on your side, should not be tolerated.
More importantly, a civil union is not the same as a marriage. Aside from the taint of "separate but equal" (which most Americans get a little crotchety over), a civil union does not grant all of the rights of a marriage. Despite claims to the contrary (typically from bigots, but many progressives believe them), several important rights are simply ignored. Civil unions vary from state to state, but they rarely include the right of property transfer, e.g., inheritance from the death of one's partner; there are many cases of people who have lost the homes they shared with a loved one despite union. Further, hospitals generally do not recognize civil unions in determining visitation and medical proxy rights; homosexuals are frequently denied the ability to see the person they love following illnesses, accidents, and such, and they do not get to make decisions or ensure the will of their partner regarding treatment options. The adoption of children is an additional oversight, and a person can lose their children if their partner dies (they do not have the guardianship that a spouse would).
I can have all of these rights and more by throwing out a single sentence in a few seconds; homosexuals cannot. That's not hyperbole, if I and a woman say we're married, then we are legally married immediately (though this also varies by state). Personally, I think that state marriage should be abolished; marriage should be a private matter with public rights determined through private contracts. The government should get rid of all marriage benefits, e.g., tax incentives, and let people do what and whom the fuck they want. Barring that, though, they should at least make the wretched institution an equal one.
@Pinworm45: I suspect you might be ill-informed to some degree. First, it isn't just homosexuals who want equality in marriage. I'm a man with an unimpeachable record of strict gynosexuality, and I don't suspect that will change anytime soon; that being said, I don't want a load of zealous bigots telling me whom I may or may not marry. I should have the right to marry a bloke, regardless of my intent to exercise it.I completely agree with you that gay, straight, whatever the fuck should have the ability to receive 100% of the exact same benefits for being "together" whether that's civil union or marriage. No argument there.
My argument is that marriage is a religious issue. That's why you have a priest do it.
And I feel that forcing a religion to do something that the bible is clearly against - and it is - is just as bad as not allowing gays to be united. You can't have freedom for one and not the other. As much as I hate religion, I can not in good conscious defend the freedom of one but not the others.
The reason I don't fucking understand it is why would any homosexual want to be united under the bible which clearly writes it can not unite them anyway, and that they're sinners and going to hell? I'm straight and I would never get married because of that, I can not comprehend why any homosexual would want that.
But like I said, I completely agree that homosexuals should have the exact same rights when united.
I think the issue is my ignorance of how it works in the states. I live in Canada and here, Civil Union affords the same legal rights as marriage. Is that not so in the states? If so, I'd be pushing for that, not for forcing a group based on a book which doesn't allow you to be united to unite you under said book.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment