somebody explain why America does not want universal health care

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for jonnyboy
jonnyboy

2867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 2

#51  Edited By jonnyboy

The NHS might not be the best in the world but it does work, and it works for everybody. We just need to refine it and make it work better. If that makes me a communist to some people, I couldn't give a fuck.

Avatar image for liquids
LiquidS

979

Forum Posts

18

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#52  Edited By LiquidS

I don't understand how Public Healthcare is seen as an evil socialist scheme while Public Schooling is not. 
 
From my knowledge of the US healthcare system, I'm very happy I've had the luxury of living in Australia & Canada under their respective healthcare systems.

Avatar image for clinkz
Clinkz

1116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53  Edited By Clinkz
@nintendoeats said:

" @ThatFrood: So what you are saying is that the free market "every man for himself" attitude has created a group of people with no sense of personal or social reponsibility that is incapable of functioning within any socialy minded framework, which causes the lower eschelons of society to suffer because they have essentially lost at economic musical chairs? Interesting... "

You can't argue with the fundamentals of American Democracy that were laid out by the Constitution. Every man starts out equal and whatever happens later is a product of only his hard work.
Avatar image for fbomb
Fbomb

1177

Forum Posts

99

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#54  Edited By Fbomb
@nintendoeats said:

" @ThatFrood: So what you are saying is that the free market "every man for himself" attitude has created a group of people with no sense of personal or social reponsibility that is incapable of functioning within any socialy minded framework, which causes the lower eschelons of society to suffer because they have essentially lost at economic musical chairs? Interesting... "

That would be a horrible birthday party to attend. 
"Honey, how was your time at little Timmy's house?"
"Bad."
"How come sweetheart?"
"We played musical chairs, and I lost."
"That's alright, there's always nex--"
"Economic Musical Chairs."
"noooooo...."
Avatar image for turambar
Turambar

8283

Forum Posts

114

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#55  Edited By Turambar
@turbomonkey138 said:
" Its been on the new in the UK for a few days now about Obama's health care reform . Now coming from a country that has a national health service i cant see why people have strong views against this reformation ....  can somebdy explain ? "
Because we have stupid people in our country. 
Avatar image for turbomonkey138
turbomonkey138

5288

Forum Posts

283

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#56  Edited By turbomonkey138
@jonnyboy said:
" The NHS might not be the best in the world but it does work, and it works for everybody. We just need to refine it and make it work better. If that makes me a communist to some people, I couldn't give a fuck. "
IN THEORY communism has some good ideas ... too bad human nature get in the way ..somebody always has to be more powerful .
Avatar image for rsistnce
RsistncE

4498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57  Edited By RsistncE
@turbomonkey138 said:

" @jonnyboy said:

" The NHS might not be the best in the world but it does work, and it works for everybody. We just need to refine it and make it work better. If that makes me a communist to some people, I couldn't give a fuck. "

IN THEORY communism has some good ideas ... too bad human nature get in the way ..somebody always has to be more powerful . "
Humans are why we can't have nice things. 
 
In all honesty the flaws in capitalism are also rearing their ugly heads. The thing is the US just did a really good job of covering them up throughout the past century or so. Either way at this point in time the best systems are the ones that employ equal measures of socialism and capitalism as needed, at least until we find something better.
 
@Clinkz said:
" @nintendoeats said:

" @ThatFrood: So what you are saying is that the free market "every man for himself" attitude has created a group of people with no sense of personal or social reponsibility that is incapable of functioning within any socialy minded framework, which causes the lower eschelons of society to suffer because they have essentially lost at economic musical chairs? Interesting... "

You can't argue with the fundamentals of American Democracy that were laid out by the Constitution. Every man starts out equal and whatever happens later is a product of only his hard work. "

The fundamentals of American democracy are not naturally tied to economic systems defined by capitalism. There can be other ways. In fact I would bet your founding fathers are probably rolling in their graves right now. The US is the definition of capitalism run amok right now.
Avatar image for nintendoeats
nintendoeats

6234

Forum Posts

828

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 9

#58  Edited By nintendoeats
@Clinkz:Yes. Yes I can. I very strongly do. Not right now, because its fairly OT (and because it is 3 in the morning and I am going to bed), but I do not think that we are best off, on the whole, in a darwinian society. Becuase it will inherently become a plutocracy, not a meritocracy...
 
No. Bed. Bad Nintendo.
Avatar image for jeffsekai
Jeffsekai

7162

Forum Posts

1060

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#59  Edited By Jeffsekai
@Fbomb: oops my bad.
 
 
@Scrawnto said:
" @Jeffsekai: Fbomb is Canadian, and you're is a contraction. "

Your not funny. Your very lame in fact.
Avatar image for fightmenerd
FightMeNerd

673

Forum Posts

1952

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

#60  Edited By FightMeNerd

This is a loaded question. Honestly most Americans just don't realize that universal health care is a great idea yet they tend to just believe what ever media outlets tell them which is usually loaded with lies.
 
1. Canada does not have to wait forever to be treated, the average wait time is around 30 minutes where Americans have to wait hours sometimes to hear from their Health care if it's okay to get surgery.
 
2. Health care agents in America are paid extra for denying health care issues. Like how they will argue if you lose 2 fingers that one is okay but the other is experimental to reattach. It doesn't make sense but by the time you can fight it, which most people don't because people will eat any bullshit lies fed to them, it will be too late to do anything about it.

Avatar image for fbomb
Fbomb

1177

Forum Posts

99

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#61  Edited By Fbomb
@nintendoeats said:
" @Fbomb: I don't disagree with you're thesis. I just don't trust decade old statistics on complicated systems. You are probably right, but we have no real way of judging that. "
I have no sound thesis. I also knew going in that 2000 was the last time that kind of study was undertaken, and it's not a perfect indication. I was just using it to point out there's no way you can make a generalization about Canada being worse off than the USA for having subsidized healthcare, when the last comprehensive study by an outside, credible source ranked Canada higher than the USA. Nothing has fundamentally changed within the last 10 years that would drastically affect either side relative to one another, where the original poster's claim could be considered valid. That's all I was doing...
Avatar image for apathylad
apathylad

3235

Forum Posts

1150

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 7

#62  Edited By apathylad

Tax concerns was one of the reasons I remember reading.

Avatar image for turambar
Turambar

8283

Forum Posts

114

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#63  Edited By Turambar
@Clinkz said:
" @nintendoeats said:

" @ThatFrood: So what you are saying is that the free market "every man for himself" attitude has created a group of people with no sense of personal or social reponsibility that is incapable of functioning within any socialy minded framework, which causes the lower eschelons of society to suffer because they have essentially lost at economic musical chairs? Interesting... "

You can't argue with the fundamentals of American Democracy that were laid out by the Constitution. Every man starts out equal and whatever happens later is a product of only his hard work. "
You can't be that naive, can you?  People in this country don't start out equal.  The conditions surrounding my childhood in this country innately sets me at a disadvantage compared to some, and an advatnage compared to others.  Geography, race, wealth, all of these are factors that take whatever semblance of equality and chucks it out the window.
Avatar image for clinkz
Clinkz

1116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64  Edited By Clinkz
@chrissedoff said:
Oh!!! So that's why they let Democrats like Geraldo Rivera and Juan Williams on their network: To slander the Democratic party and enchance the Republican outlook!
 
 
 
 
 
 
Seriously man?
Avatar image for cstrang
cstrang

2417

Forum Posts

2213

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#65  Edited By cstrang

People fear change.  And taxes.  People don't like the idea of "free-loaders".  I'm all for universal health care, though.  Everyone has the right to good health, not just the wealthy.

Avatar image for clinkz
Clinkz

1116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66  Edited By Clinkz
@Turambar said

You can't be that naive, can you?  People in this country don't start out equal.  The conditions surrounding my childhood in this country innately sets me at a disadvantage compared to some, and an advatnage compared to others.  Geography, race, wealth, all of these are factors that take whatever semblance of equality and chucks it out the window. " 

It's late and I want to get to bed but in short, there are ways to offset the disadvantage. Affirmative action to name one; anti-trust laws to name another. Whether I believe the government's role in these pieces is justified remains questionable, I do believe all men can be destined for greatness no matter who they are or where they come from. but this is REALLY off-topic so I'm going to end.
Avatar image for ez123
ez123

2166

Forum Posts

170

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 12

#67  Edited By ez123
@Clinkz: MSNBC gave Joe Scarborough a 3 hour show.  Any democrat get than find of time on Fox News?
 
 They are 1000x more fair than Fox confirmed.
Avatar image for mr_jpeps
Mr_JPeps

189

Forum Posts

80

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

#68  Edited By Mr_JPeps

 @turbomonkey138:  
This is really difficult for a lot of people to come to a concise answer about. People are either too proud, or ignorant to see things from both sides, and most Americans are far too lazy to go out and do their own research on the subject when it is spoon fed to us everyday by Fox News, and CNN. In the simplest terms, the main reason most do not want it is due to fear of change and fear of the unknown. People are scared that taxes are going to go up, or we are going to go bankrupt (we already are), or that they will have to go on a waiting list if they need a heart, a lung, or a blood transfusion. It all boils down to fear, fear of change and something we aren't use to and now days it seems like that is how the US gov likes controlling the masses. Another big issue is that a lot of people know just how shity, corrupt and unintelligent the U.S. gov really is, and again, people fear that anything that they might come up with as a solution would simply be "half ass'd" or "they would find some way to really mess it up." As for me, I'm for it, I was just laid off from my job a few weeks ago due to "economic climate decline" that means i have lost all my jobs insurance benefits, meaning that if i get in a wreck or get cancer, i would either have to refuse treatment due to being unable to afford it, or go through with what i need but would owe the medical provider hundreds of thousands of dollars. I can keep my old job's benifits, but would have to pay a 3rd party company roughly about 300-400% more then what it cost when it was simply deducted from my pay check. Or take my G/F for example. She goes to college full time, and works full time, but her place of work does not offer health benefits, meaning she is roughly in the same boat as me, yet she goes to school and works full time. I feel that a national health care plan would be good news for people such as us, and people in our, or similar situations. But again, this is the U.S. Gov we are talking about and I'm sure they will find a way to mess it up for us even if they do happen to get the plan passed.

Avatar image for chrissedoff
chrissedoff

2387

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69  Edited By chrissedoff
@gla55jAw said:

" @chrissedoff said:

" @turbomonkey138:  the vast majority of americans do want health care.  unfortunately, health care reform would adversely affect the profits of health insurance companies, who have a lot of money to throw around--and a lot of politicians willing to shill for them--in order to drag proposed reform through the mud and tar its proponents as anti-american communists. smears like that stick when they're repeated often enough. the fact that countries besides america have functioning health care systems doesn't help; many americans believe in a strange circular logic which dictates no other country can be better than america at anything. therefore, american health care is the best around. therefore, adopting practices from foreign countries can only taint the purity of american health care.  a large segment of the american population does not have adequate health care coverage. but, the majority of americans do have decent coverage which they receive either from their employer or from government-assisted coverage like medicare for seniors. this can contribute to ignorance of the trouble un-covered people go through, and even a callous "fuck you, i got mine" attitude. americans hate the idea of someone receiving a "free ride" on their tax dollars. and for some people, mainly the fox news-watching crowd, a big part of being against health care reform is going to benefit minorities, who they don't see as being "real" americans. "

I think you just lost all credibility when you basically called all Republicans racists. "
 "You start out in 1954 by saying, N****r, n****r, n****r." By 1968 you can't say "n****r"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me—because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "N****r, n****r."" 
--Lee Atwater, Republican political strategist
 
i didn't come close to calling all republicans racist. however, you would have to be willfully blind to deny that the republican party is represented by, and supported by, nearly all white people. for obvious examples, look at how conservative politicians in border states have made hay out of the illegal immigration issue. it would be naive to deny that fear of or hostility toward non-white, non-english speaking people is a primary concern, although to say so out loud would eliminate the plausible deniability on which they rely to claim not to be racist. in the southern united states, the current stronghold for the gop, you hear a lot of subtle race-baiting from politicians. if you can remember back to last year, there was all that panic over whether obama was really an american. when polled, the majority of republican respondents said he wasn't or that they were unsure. in order for that to be possible, there has to be some kind of underlying distrust of visibly different people in positions of leadership. no white person has ever or would ever be the subject of such an idiotic conspiracy theory.
 
but, like i said at the beginning of the above paragraph, i'm not calling all republicans racist, nor am i necessarily saying that racism even factors at all into the majority of republicans' political opinions. however, it is undeniably significant, and if a racist person is going to pick one of the two parties, let's be honest, he's not going to gravitate towards the democrats, and that is for good reason. the republican party's platform is designed, in part, to appeal specifically to white people and in some cases that entails fearmongering and demonization of minorities and foreigners. i would be shocked if you genuinely believed politicians are above this.
Avatar image for clinkz
Clinkz

1116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70  Edited By Clinkz
@ez123 said:
" @Clinkz: MSNBC gave Joe Scarborough a 3 hour show.  Any democrat get than find of time on Fox News?  They are 1000x more fair than Fox confirmed. "
Yeah, they even gave Geraldo a primetime slot. Wish as much could have been said for ol' Joe.
Avatar image for scarace360
scarace360

4813

Forum Posts

41

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71  Edited By scarace360

i don't know why but im happy up here in Canada with my FREE good health care and anybody who says differently ill cut your fingers off and they will only attach 1 back on!

Avatar image for strangeling
strangeling

1317

Forum Posts

28

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 50

#72  Edited By strangeling

Because national healthcare uses the metric system?

Avatar image for fbomb
Fbomb

1177

Forum Posts

99

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#73  Edited By Fbomb
@BadNews said:
  1. Canada does not have to wait forever to be treated, the average wait time is around 30 minutes where Americans have to wait hours sometimes to hear from their Health care if it's okay to get surgery. 
30 Minutes to be admitted, not treated. Last time I went to a hospital with a broken rib, I was admitted within 15 minutes, but took an hour to get my xrays, another hour and a half to see a doctor, and all-told was a 3 hour treatment. It was 10pm on a Sunday, though, so who knows how long it usually takes. Being admitted and receiving treatment are two separate things, however.
Avatar image for ez123
ez123

2166

Forum Posts

170

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 12

#74  Edited By ez123
@Clinkz: Oh damn, I thought he was a registered republican. Do you have any links where he outright says he's a democrat?
Avatar image for w0lfbl1tzers
W0lfbl1tzers

1791

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 4

#75  Edited By W0lfbl1tzers

There should be both a public and private option.  
@Clinkz
 : I really hate all "news" outlets such as fox and msnbc because they don't give you the dry facts. They gussy it up to make it play to a crowd that would not normally pay attention to news. They have reverted to the internet age of who can get more clicks. I am what you would call a moderate and my stepfather is a very christian man. I love him to death and we disagree on a fair amount of things except for one: Fox, MSNC, and other "news" outlets are just plain disgusting. Also, is it fair to have a hardworking man lose his pension just before retirement because some greedy bastard who started out of college with no sense of what hard work actually is took the company for everything it was worth? I don't think so. Our system is not fair. There is no system that is, but it should never be that damn ruthless

Avatar image for chrissedoff
chrissedoff

2387

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76  Edited By chrissedoff
@Clinkz said:
" @chrissedoff said: Oh!!! So that's why they let Democrats like Geraldo Rivera and Juan Williams on their network: To slander the Democratic party and enchance the Republican outlook!       Seriously man? "
two things:
1. fox cherry-picks democrats who will either make absurdly weak arguments or actually agree with whatever conservative pundit or anchor they are talking to (because of course no liberal commentators have their own shows on fox news). they do this deliberately because it allows people who enjoy fox news to tell themselves that the network really is `fair and balanced`because `hey look that guy has a "d" next to his name surely they are representing all viewpoints equally".
 
2. geraldo rivera is a democrat? are you sure you aren't just inferring that from the fact that he disagreed with bill o'reilly one time?
Avatar image for jkz
jkz

4287

Forum Posts

268

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

#77  Edited By jkz
@RsistncE said:

" @turbomonkey138 said:

" @jonnyboy said:

" The NHS might not be the best in the world but it does work, and it works for everybody. We just need to refine it and make it work better. If that makes me a communist to some people, I couldn't give a fuck. "

IN THEORY communism has some good ideas ... too bad human nature get in the way ..somebody always has to be more powerful . "
Humans are why we can't have nice things. 
 
In all honesty the flaws in capitalism are also rearing their ugly heads. The thing is the US just did a really good job of covering them up throughout the past century or so. Either way at this point in time the best systems are the ones that employ equal measures of socialism and capitalism as needed, at least until we find something better.
 
@Clinkz said:
" @nintendoeats said:

" @ThatFrood: So what you are saying is that the free market "every man for himself" attitude has created a group of people with no sense of personal or social reponsibility that is incapable of functioning within any socialy minded framework, which causes the lower eschelons of society to suffer because they have essentially lost at economic musical chairs? Interesting... "

You can't argue with the fundamentals of American Democracy that were laid out by the Constitution. Every man starts out equal and whatever happens later is a product of only his hard work. "
The fundamentals of American democracy are not naturally tied to economic systems defined by capitalism. There can be other ways. In fact I would bet your founding fathers are probably rolling in their graves right now. The US is the definition of capitalism run amok right now. "
Shit, those were the two comments I was going to respond to, and I was going to respond to them in a manner that matches almost word for word what you said; so, instead of repeating your assertions, I will merely quote them and imply that I agree wholeheartedly with you. 
 
In the world of forum linguistics, I do believe this is often referred to as: 
 

THIS

Avatar image for mikevanpwn
mikevanpwn

432

Forum Posts

6815

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

#78  Edited By mikevanpwn

I fear that Universal Healthcare is a death warrant to many whom I love and care for.  People who support the bill are too near-sided to see the adverse effects that this bill will cause. 
 
Healthcare, like any other service, has two values attached to itself.  A real value, and a monetary value.  The government believes that eliminating the direct monetary value to healthcare will solve the system in the United States, it will not.  In reality the cost will be just the same, only it will be incurred with waiting in line to get health service.  Proponents for healthcare don't realize that:
A) America has a much larger population than Canada or the  UK.  With 300+ million people the scale of this bill is a lot larger than the systems in place in those countries.  
B)  This healthcare bill will improve the coverage of non-life threatening illness, but it will greatly decrease the coverage of cancer and other life-threatening disease.  There will be waiting lists for things like transplants and important surgeries.
C) Many medical practices will close shop due to the cost,, meaning less options in getting treatment.   
D) America wont even be able to afford this system in the long run.  Some more liberal estimates state that the system can be paid for an upwards of 10 years before it goes bankrupt.    
E) The free-market is the reason why healthcare is as good as it is today.  Restrictions placed on the healthcare system will reduce innovation and research of new technology.  Technology that has only been invented because companies have had profits as an incentive to develop these technologies.  Universal Healthcare will cut these opportunities for profit, meaning R&D of new technology will not be able to continue.  
F) Small business will get hit will extra taxes for health coverage, meaning larger unemployment, meaning less paying into the system, meaning less efficiency. 
 
People who argue against healthcare aren't ignorants boobs as most like to think.  And I mean what I say about a death warrant, it is inevitable that in the future those close to me will get cancer, or some sort of ailment that will require treatment, but since socialized healthcare means rationing of resources by forming lines, those who really need urgent treatment will be forced to wait in line in a bogged down system, and many will die at an earlier age because of this. 
 
This isn't a matter about Conservative vs. Liberal, Republican vs. Democrat, Rich vs. Poor, Educated vs. Uneducated as most make it out to be.  In reality the economics of this bill doesn't add up and will not work in the long run.

Avatar image for jerr
Jerr

536

Forum Posts

54

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#79  Edited By Jerr
@Skytylz said:
" Because it will Bankrupt our country and universal health care sucks.  Canada has rather poor health care and the have "universal health care".  Our system isn't that bad right now, and it isn't the insurance companies causing the problems.  It's the $100 bandaids at hospitals causing it. "
Canada has been considered to have some of the best health care in the world for some time, unlike the US, which is at #39 or something.
Avatar image for pwnasaurus
pwnasaurus

1298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#80  Edited By pwnasaurus
@Clinkz:
are you fucking stupid?
Avatar image for spazmaster666
spazmaster666

2114

Forum Posts

42

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 16

#81  Edited By spazmaster666

There's nothing inherently problematic with Universal Healthcare (well, other than how much it would cost) as long as private insurance companies are allowed to compete with the government-run public option. We've all seen how well a government-run program can be run (i.e. Tricare) but we've also seen how poorly it can be run (i.e. Medicare, Medicaid). What's the lesson here? It's all about money. Tricare works because it's a very expensive program, and the same can be said for Medicare and Medicaid on the other end of the spectrum. So whatever the public option would be (assuming it is passed one of these days) it's going to be very expensive if it's indeed going to be a well run program.  It's when the public option becomes the only option where the serious problems begin to emerge. A government monopoly on heathcare would be a very bad idea and a direct affront to personal liberty (even if it were a well-run program).

Avatar image for gunslingernz
gunslingerNZ

2010

Forum Posts

300

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#82  Edited By gunslingerNZ
@Clinkz said:
" 1. It will bankrupt the country even more so than it already is. 2. Its a blatant grab of power by the government over all health care options and also in this 2300 page monstrosity it tries to sneak in control of other things to such as education.3. The quality of the check ups will diminish as this public takeover will run out many private doctors. "
There's nothing that precludes a private health system operating alongside a public system. It happens in countries all across the world.
Avatar image for spazmaster666
spazmaster666

2114

Forum Posts

42

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 16

#83  Edited By spazmaster666
@gunslingerNZ said:
There's nothing that precludes a private health system operating alongside a public system. It happens in countries all across the world. "
True, but some countries also make it illegal for health providers to accept private insurance if they are covered by government insurance plans (this is basically how most provinces in Canada handled things until very recently).
Avatar image for meteora
meteora

5844

Forum Posts

17

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

#84  Edited By meteora

Its a cultural and political thing. Americans don't like having the idea that minority groups benefit off of their taxpayers money and have for a long time been influenced by rightist ideas throughout the cold war. Political idealogy does not go away within a few years after all of that nonsense. It'll take generations for them to change their ideals.
 
Plus it'll bankrupt the nation. Quite frankly I can't see how this is going to work when there's somewhat of a economic recession out there.

Avatar image for chrissedoff
chrissedoff

2387

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85  Edited By chrissedoff
@Meteora:  the country's already bankrupt, borrowing money it can't possibly hope to pay back in increasing amounts year after year. so far, all we have to show for it are 2 intractable wars and a gigantic gift for banks whose loan and investment policies would be against the law in a just society, and tax cuts for the wealthiest people in the country.
don't you think it's a pretty good trick on the part of corporate/conservative p.r. that the american public can be persuaded to sell the country's future economic stability to kill people in foreign countries and give away money to people who already have a lot of it, but we'll draw the line at caring for the neediest members of society?
Avatar image for ravenousrattler
Ravenousrattler

1420

Forum Posts

188

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

#86  Edited By Ravenousrattler

politicians are making it more complicated than it needs to be, we really don't have the money right now, people don't want to federally fund abortions.

Avatar image for chrissedoff
chrissedoff

2387

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87  Edited By chrissedoff
@Ravenousrattler: america doesn't have the money to do anything really. that is not an intelligent argument against health-care reform. if the country's dire financial straits were something that anyone actually cared, about, people would be talking seriously about raising the ridiculously low income tax rates for rich people. the country's out of money. the question is really do you want to be out of money and let everyone have decent health care or just out of money with nothing to show for it.
Avatar image for gunner
Gunner

4424

Forum Posts

248

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 6

#88  Edited By Gunner
@chrissedoff said:
" @Ravenousrattler: america doesn't have the money to do anything really. that is not an intelligent argument against health-care reform. if the country's dire financial straits were something that anyone actually cared, about, people would be talking seriously about raising the ridiculously low income tax rates for rich people. the country's out of money. the question is really do you want to be out of money and let everyone have decent health care or just out of money with nothing to show for it. "
When your in debt, you dont increase spending, you cut back and increase income. 
Avatar image for mrfizzy
mrfizzy

1666

Forum Posts

58

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 6

#89  Edited By mrfizzy
@Clinkz said:
" 1. It will bankrupt the country even more so than it already is. 2. Its a blatant grab of power by the government over all health care options and also in this 2300 page monstrosity it tries to sneak in control of other things to such as education.3. The quality of the check ups will diminish as this public takeover will run out many private doctors. "
Look im not American, but if private health care works so well in other countries why dont you think it would work in the US? I know youve made your points but we have a mix of public and private health care here in Australia and it works reasonably well. Its not perfect but it works. Why wouldnt it work in America?  
Avatar image for jakj
JakJ

1045

Forum Posts

4907

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90  Edited By JakJ

Because the bill in its current mutilated, bastardized form isn't close to universal healthcare as you know it.
 
What it boils down to is forcing people who are uninsured to buy a private insurance plan, and a) Americans hate being forced to do anything by our government and b) a lot of my countrymen are retarded and believe the negative propaganda, fear tactics, and lies being broadcast from some media outlets and are very vocal about it.
 
Thats how I see it anyway.

Avatar image for coombs
Coombs

3509

Forum Posts

587

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#91  Edited By Coombs
@Clinkz said:

" 1. It will bankrupt the country even more so than it already is. 2. Its a blatant grab of power by the government over all health care options and also in this 2300 page monstrosity it tries to sneak in control of other things to such as education.3. The quality of the check ups will diminish as this public takeover will run out many private doctors. "

Way to watch fox news and have the ability to repeat what your told.
 

                                                                          The RIGHT to Health Care                                                                                                                Because It shouldn't be a privilege
                                                                          The RIGHT to Health Care                                                                                                                Because It shouldn't be a privilege
Avatar image for hailinel
Hailinel

25785

Forum Posts

219681

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 28

#92  Edited By Hailinel
@gunslingerNZ said:
" Because it's seen as communist by the extremist right wingers in Washington. I also come from a country with a publicly funded health care system and it works out great! "
No, it's seen as Socialist, not Communist.  That being said, while everyone should be entitled to health coverage, the government's explanations of the proposed health care plans have been ludicrously poor and uninformative.  With the confusion this causes, combined with the massive price tag attached, people are justifiably freaked out about it because congress can't get their heads out of their asses long enough to give us a straight answer on just what the bill entails.
 
Then you have the Democratic Party, which for a time was very close to taking a "Damn the torpedoes" approach to passing a health care bill, any health care bill, regardless of criticisms levied.  The amount of time that this debate has taken has soured the good will that Obama had earned prior to entering office and the general good will for Democrats in general.  The midterm elections are thus far not looking favorable for the party and it's likely that the makeup of congress will be shaken up significantly this November because of this ineptitude, whether it be real or imagined.
 
Personally, I want us Americans to have access to health care.  However, the government just needs to do a better job of telling us what it is that their proposed legislation would actually accomplish.  Otherwise, they'll just end up pissing off a lot of people and their plan will ultimately fail in a manner not unlike what Hillary Clinton tried to get pushed through during Bill Clinton's first term as president in the early '90s.
Avatar image for jakj
JakJ

1045

Forum Posts

4907

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93  Edited By JakJ
@Meteora:  Wonderful argument. We're broke, but it's more important to raise the already gargantuan DoD budget by 7% rather than care for the sick. Our country has such great priorities.
Avatar image for seriouslynow
SeriouslyNow

8504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#94  Edited By SeriouslyNow
@JakJ said:
" Because the bill in its current mutilated, bastardized form isn't close to universal healthcare as you know it.  What it boils down to is forcing people who are uninsured to buy a private insurance plan, and a) Americans hate being forced to do something by our government and b) a lot of my countrymen are retarded and believe the negative propaganda, fear tactics, and lies being broadcast from some media outlets and are very vocal about it.  Thats how I see it anyway. "
I don't know if you know this but all forms of socialised healthcare force people to buy insurance one way or another, whether it's by taxing their income and expenditure to pay for the basics and to incentivise them to purchase insurance to be covered outside of the basics (as in Australia and the UK) or by just taxing their income directly (as in Czechoslovakia).  The point is that they get covered for hospitalisation regardless of their income which is what makes healthcare what it should be in democratic nations; a right and not a privilege.  The fact that even basic care is privilege is what makes the American health system so expensive and those who have to use it such victims of insurer fraud.  Wake up to yourself and wake up to what's really going on around you, people shouldn't have to go broke just because they become ill.
Avatar image for ryanwho
ryanwho

12011

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95  Edited By ryanwho

We can't afford it. Medicare is basically universal health care for a specific age bracket and its coffers are nearly empty. And if we could afford it, we'd still have 3 health insurance lobbyists per representative making sure the misinformation talking points continue to circulate. People trying to pin it on one side over another are just being petty, living in a fantasy world. The reality is the current healthcare bill has an individual mandate, and nobody's contesting that on either side. So they're forcing you to bye for profit health care. Not the left, not the right, all of them. Because they think you can afford to lose another 8 percent of your yearly income if it means 30 million more people are insured (and if they're not, that they're paying fines). 
Its such a bag of dicks I can't watch the news anymore till its over.

Avatar image for twoonefive
TwoOneFive

9793

Forum Posts

203

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#96  Edited By TwoOneFive

because we owe 13 trillion fucking dollars. we're in a war. and among many other serious issues, i think we have enough on our plate right now thankyou very much. obama care needs to take a back seat for a while. this shit is for people who only care about themselves and live off the system anyways. well i mean i know its for more than just that, but you know millions will abuse it just like they are now, costing tax payers millions every year that could be spent on something worthwile. fucking freeloading low lifes are ruining this fucking country- destroying neighborhoods, creating violence, uncontrollably procreating and usually at young ages...and they just keep collecint their wic and access cards and section 8 housing and so on and so forth. well this is just how it is in philly. im so fed up with it. seriously though, we're 13 trillion dollars in debt, and obama's number one goal right now is free healthcare?!!

Avatar image for jakj
JakJ

1045

Forum Posts

4907

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97  Edited By JakJ
@SeriouslyNow:  Already awake, thanks.
 
I didn't voice my opinion one way or the other, just tried to answer the op as I see it from inside America.
 
I don't know if you know this but there's a difference between directly paying a private company for basic insurance versus paying taxes for a government backed health care system. But don't worry, your misguided patronizing was appreciated.
Avatar image for emkeighcameron
emkeighcameron

1895

Forum Posts

30

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#98  Edited By emkeighcameron

Turbomonkey, why you gotta go startin' shit

Avatar image for ryanwho
ryanwho

12011

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99  Edited By ryanwho
@TwoOneFive said:

" because we owe 13 trillion fucking dollars. we're in a war. and among many other serious issues, i think we have enough on our plate right now thankyou very much. obama care needs to take a back seat for a while. this shit if for people who only care about themselves and live off the system anyways.  "

As opposed to people like you, who have the foresight to continue living off their parents? Give me a break, this whole "anyone who needs help is just being lazy" myth is propagated by the privileged so they don't feel guilty about buying a fancy car instead of donating to Haiti. You know, since obviously people who make more money are working harder, right? That's how the system works, right? What a joker. Rich people walk around with money their great grandparents made on the backs of slaves then complain about  underprivileged who often happen to be progeny to those slaves 'begging' for handouts. You don't deserve to hoard 'your' funds for being related to people who exploited others to make a fortune. 
Avatar image for obscurefan
obscurefan

298

Forum Posts

6511

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 7

#100  Edited By obscurefan

Because of two main reasons. The first being that our government doesn't really know how to explain things to us, if they explained universal healthcare in a way the average american could understand then we'd be more accepting of it. And secondly, the media scares the hell out of people in this country because they need ratings. They have actually compared universal health care to what Hitler did back in the 40s and people believe it as though it were accurate. So its a double whammy of stupidity.