@HitmanAgent47 said:The special effects will need so much work. In the commentary for the DVD, he comments on how bad a lot of the scenes look now, such as how the people standing on the outside of the boat in the first panning shot have no textures on them. Even when you see the holes, it's still an amazing film.Gladitator and braveheart is okay, overated, but titanic is better. Sure the first half is boring, but the second half, lots of ppl dies and stuff. Then again where is the blue ray cameron? Where is the blu ray?theyre working on it.. lol. its going to be one hell of a blu-ray for sure.
What's the better film?
Is Braveheart worth watching? Mel Gibson is both a fantastic actor and director but after seeing Stewart Lee tearing the film apart, I don't know if I could really watch it seriously.Braveheart is a great movie and I'm not just saying that because my Scottish best friend is forcing me to.
I feel like TItanic is really overrated. Besides seeing Kate Winslet's tits, I don't get why Leo was so in love with her. I mean she was super selfish hogging the debri that led to him being frozen to death. Anyways, I think Mel Gibson is a total badass so I'm going with Braveheart.
Gladiator had a black guy.so? I dont follow. lots of shit movies do, but hey gladiator was good. they also have a bunch of good movies with black guys (shawshank, green mile). just sayin'
Titanic was epic crap - it has dancing, a nude scene, people drowning, oh and rich people looking down on the poor. the first 5 minutes were my favourite (gambling). and, lets see Braveheart wasnt exactly perfect, though worth seeing. Gladiator was a mish mash of history, but from an epic standpoint it was pretty epic. Overall, I wouldnt give any of these movies my top 20, but Gladiator is pretty damn close.
Gladiator is my favorite of these and one of my favorite movies. Love the cinematography and the soundtrack to that movie.
What's better: Mel Gibson being torn to pieces, Kate Winslet's tits, or Joaquin Phoenix getting stabbed? Winslet's tits are okay, could be bigger. Phoenix is a douche and I loved seeing him die, but Mel Gibson's borderline orgasm while being ripped apart takes the cake.Mel Gibson was ripped apart? Dude!
Titanic is crap.
I'm having a hard time picking between Braveheart and Gladiator. Braveheart was epic and I still listen to the score occasionally. Gladiator was shorter, and yet somehow still came across as an epic. And again, great music.
I don't judge those movies by what Mel Gibson may be like offscreen. Just as I don't judge Tom Cruise movies by his scientology and couch-jumping antics.
@ThePhantomnaut said:I guess I am not serious enough for this thread. :)Gladiator had a black guy.so? I dont follow. lots of shit movies do, but hey gladiator was good. they also have a bunch of good movies with black guys (shawshank, green mile). just sayin' Titanic was epic crap - it has dancing, a nude scene, people drowning, oh and rich people looking down on the poor. the first 5 minutes were my favourite (gambling). and, lets see Braveheart wasnt exactly perfect, though worth seeing. Gladiator was a mish mash of history, but from an epic standpoint it was pretty epic. Overall, I wouldnt give any of these movies my top 20, but Gladiator is pretty damn close.
And don't forget. "It's MY island!"The correct answer is Braveheart. "The English won't let us train with weapons, so we have to train with stones." Also, watch Gladiator and Pirates of the Caribbean back to back while paying attention to the soundtrack. They recycled the same "epic" tracks for both movies.
Also: I think I would like to know how many people have actually seen all three movies and aren't just going on "Kate Winslet's tits" or "Mel Gibson blah blah."
Gladiator. Titanic kinda seems out of place from those choices, maybe Robin Hood should have been third choice.
I love all three movies, man. I may have to go with Gladiator, though. Even though I usually lose interest during certain parts of it.
@VelvetLore04 said:
@HandsomeDead said:Umm... what was wrong with her breasts in Little Children and The Reader, dude?Is Braveheart worth watching? Mel Gibson is both a fantastic actor and director but after seeing Stewart Lee tearing the film apart, I don't know if I could really watch it seriously.Braveheart was one of those 'good at the time, bad in retrospect' movies. Out of that list I'd rather watch Titanic. It at least has the Zane train and Kate Winslet's breasts pre-Little Children and The Reader.
I love all three movies, man. I may have to go with Gladiator, though. Even though I usually lose interest during certain parts of it.In Titanic they were nice to look at, they were still the breasts of a young woman. In Little Children her breasts are noticeably different no doubt due to her former pregnancy. Or because she was being railed by Patrick Wilson at the time and it's hard to focus on her breasts when you have such a long shot of Patrick Wilson's rear.
@VelvetLore04 said:@HandsomeDead said:Umm... what was wrong with her breasts in Little Children and The Reader, dude?Is Braveheart worth watching? Mel Gibson is both a fantastic actor and director but after seeing Stewart Lee tearing the film apart, I don't know if I could really watch it seriously.Braveheart was one of those 'good at the time, bad in retrospect' movies. Out of that list I'd rather watch Titanic. It at least has the Zane train and Kate Winslet's breasts pre-Little Children and The Reader.
In short, her breasts lost their youth.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment